3 research outputs found

    ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๊ฐ„ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ž„์ƒ์  ๊ณ ์œ„ํ—˜๊ตฐ์—์„œ ์ •์‹ ์ฆ ๋ฐœ๋ณ‘ ์˜ˆ์ธก

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ์ž์—ฐ๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ๋‡Œ์ธ์ง€๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2017. 8. ๊ถŒ์ค€์ˆ˜.Among individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) who show prodromal symptoms of psychosis, some progress to full-blown psychosis. There have been attempts to find markers predicting the onset of psychosis, and brain structures related to onset of psychosis have been reported. However, no studies have examined wide-range interactions at the functional network level that can adequately account for the schizophrenia, a dysconnectivity disorder. To discover predicting markers for psychosis, I conducted a longitudinal study for a follow-up period of a minimum of 12 months. At the baseline, the resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging was acquired from individuals at CHR (N = 69), individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP) (N = 35), and healthy controls (HC) (N = 70). Eight psychosis-related functional networks were extracted, and interactions between paired functional networks were measured, resulting in estimations of 28 possible combinations. After the group comparison, correlation analyses between the altered network interactions and symptom severity were conducted to reveal clinical associations. Seven of 69 (10%) individuals at CHR proceeded to full-blown psychosis (CHR-C). There were no significant difference in age, gender, and handedness among FEP, CHR-C, CHR-NC, and HC. Of the 28 combinations, there were significant group differences in four functional network connectivity. The FEP group showed the most severe degree of decrement in functional network connectivity compared to HC. Among all four significantly different functional network interactions, CHR-C showed no significant difference from FEP, while the nonconverters (CHR-NC) had significantly higher functional network connectivity compared to FEP. Among the altered combinations, the interaction between the anterior default mode network and salience network of the FEP group was associated with the overall negative psychotic symptom severity. This is the first study to suggest that large network interactions can serve as potential markers of the psychosis onset by showing that the CHR-C is similar to FEP, while CHR-NC is comparable to HC. The degree of functional network connectivity in CHR may have prognostic implications regarding the risk of conversion to full-blown psychosis.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Methods 12 Chapter 3. Results 20 Chapter 4. Discussion 22 Chapter 5. Conclusion 31 References 32 Tables 44 Figures 57 Abstract in Korean 67Docto

    Prediction of Liquid Surge for Gas Wells Using Machine Learning

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2022.2. ์ •ํ›ˆ์˜.Liquid surge is the inflow liquid volume during a time interval in the pipeline flow. To analyze the liquid surge problem, the multiphase flow simulator is used. On the other hand, the license cost of the flow simulator is high, and the number of licenses is limited to apply to several wells. The machine learning model for predicting maximum liquid surge volume can resolve the problem of licenses. In this research, the feedforward network is used. The input variables are previous wellhead pressure, target wellhead pressure, gas volume flow rate, water-gas ratio, and the number of fracture stages for hydraulic fractured shale gas well. The output variables are gas and water volume flow rate after adjusting pressure, and maximum liquid surge volume. Although the prediction accuracy is high with a coefficient of determination of 0.9 or more, the prediction ability decreases when the water-gas ratio is high. Furthermore, the feedforward network model has no significant prediction ability decrease when the pipeline length becomes longer. In addition, sequential adjusting, one of the solutions for liquid surge problem, is applied to feedforward network model, which has high prediction accuracy.์•ก์ฒด ์„œ์ง€(Liquid Surge)๋Š” ๊ด€ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ํŠน์ • ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ ๋™์•ˆ ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ์•ก์ฒด ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์•ก์ฒด ์„œ์ง€ ๋ฌธ์ œ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์ƒ ๊ด€ ์œ ๋™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค์˜ ์ˆ˜์™€ ๋น„์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ œ์•ฝ์ด ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋™์‹œ์— ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์œ ์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ก์ฒด ์„œ์ง€ ๋ฌธ์ œ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ก์ฒด ์„œ์ง€ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋ฉด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค์˜ ์ œ์•ฝ ์—†์ด ์•ก์ฒด ์„œ์ง€ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ˆœ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ํ•™์Šต ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜„์žฅ ์ง€์ƒ์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ธ์ž์ธ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ ์ „๊ณผ ํ›„์˜ ์ •๋‘ ์••๋ ฅ, ๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ถ€ํ”ผ์œ ๋Ÿ‰, ๋ฌผ-๊ฐ€์Šค๋น„์œจ, ์ด ์ˆ˜์•• ํŒŒ์‡„ ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ž…๋ ฅ ์ธ์ž๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์„œ์ง€ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ์™€ ์ •๋‘ ์••๋ ฅ ์กฐ์ ˆ ํ›„ ๊ฐ€์Šค์™€ ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ํ•™์Šต ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ •ํ™•๋„๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ • ๊ณ„์ˆ˜ 0.9 ์ด์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋งค์šฐ ๋†’์ง€๋งŒ ๋ฌผ-๊ฐ€์Šค๋น„์œจ์ด ๋†’์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์ˆœ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ํ•™์Šต ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์ „์ฒด ๊ด€ ์œ ๋™ ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ธธ์–ด์ ธ๋„ ์•ˆ์ •๋œ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋‹จ๊ณ„์  ์••๋ ฅ ์กฐ์ ˆ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์•ก์ฒด ์„œ์ง€ ๋ฌธ์ œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ์—๋„ ๋งค์šฐ ๋†’์€ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค.์ œ 1 ์žฅ ์„œ๋ก  1 1.1 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ชฉ์  1 1.2 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ 2 ์ œ 2 ์žฅ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  5 2.1 ์•ก์ฒด ์„œ์ง€ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ์˜ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ 5 2.2 ์ˆœ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง 6 ์ œ 3 ์žฅ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์•ก์ฒด ์„œ์ง€ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ 8 3.1 ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐœ์š” 8 3.2 ๋ชจ๋ธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์˜ˆ์‹œ 10 3.3 ํ›ˆ๋ จ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ 12 3.4 ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 14 3.5 ์˜ํ–ฅ ์ธ์ž ๋ถ„์„ 20 ์ œ 4 ์žฅ ์œ ๋™ ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ธด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ์ ์šฉ 24 4.1 ๋ถ„์„ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐœ์š” 24 4.2 ํ›ˆ๋ จ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ 27 4.3 ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 28 ์ œ 5 ์žฅ ์ •๋‘์••๋ ฅ์˜ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์  ์กฐ์ ˆ ์ ์šฉ 34 5.1 ๋ถ„์„ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐœ์š” 34 5.2 ํ›ˆ๋ จ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ 34 5.3 ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 36 ์ œ 6 ์žฅ ๊ฒฐ๋ก  44 ์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ 46 Abstract 48์„
    corecore