5 research outputs found
A Study on the Non-productive Movement in Container Terminal
The container liners have strived in order to survive from persistence crisis by seeking the most efficient vessel operation with different ways such as Merger & Acquisition (M&A), reorganizing the alliance, awarding mega vessel and so on since 2010. On this fierce competition the largest shipping line in Korea, Han-jin Shipping Line, went into receivership and drove the company into bankruptcy.
On the other hand, the larger shipping line which succeed to survive from the game have consistently been forcing the terminal operator to achieve the lower tariff with better service. In order to break through, terminal operators have reinforced investment with improving terminal system and automation with high-tech equipment.
With those tremendous efforts, however, terminal operators are still confronting difficulties including βNon-productive Movementβ which is one of the biggest challenge in operation. In this thesis, we verify the definition of non-productive movement, proportion and effect in real operation by analyzing the cases.
To address non-productive movement in operation, we've analyzed A container terminal's actual case. As a result, we could identify that those cases are composed of vessel operation(Loading/unloading), In/outbound operation, other terminal operations and unproductive operation which resulted from terminal structure.
By this research, we could connect the dots that how the unproductive operations account for overall terminal operation and identify opportunities of improvement for service quality and competitiveness of terminal by improving those problems.
However, this thesis aims at justifying the necessity of process improvement for terminal stakeholder such as shipping lines, transportation company and external truck drivers as it's strongly bonded to their benefits as well as terminal operative efficiency improvement provided that terminal's unproductive operation was removed.List of Tables β
±
List of Figures β
²
Abstract β
³
μ 1 μ₯ μ λ‘ 1
1.1 μ°κ΅¬λ°°κ²½ 1
1.2 μ°κ΅¬λͺ©μ 2
1.3 μ°κ΅¬λ΄μ© λ° λ°©λ² 4
μ 2 μ₯ μ νμ°κ΅¬ κ³ μ°° μ°κ΅¬ 5
2.1 κ΅λ΄λ¬Έν μ°κ΅¬ 5
2.2 κ΅μΈλ¬Έν μ°κ΅¬ 10
μ 3 μ₯ 컨ν
μ΄λ ν°λ―Έλ μΌλ° λ° μ¬λ‘λΆμ λμ μκ° 12
3.1 컨ν
μ΄λ ν°λ―Έλμ μ μ 12
3.2 컨ν
μ΄λ ν°λ―Έλμ μμ€ λ° μ₯λΉ 13
3.3 컨ν
μ΄λ ν°λ―Έλμ νμμμ€ν
μ μ’
λ₯ 19
3.4 μ¬λ‘λΆμ λμ 컨ν
μ΄λ ν°λ―Έλ 21
μ 4 μ₯ 컨ν
μ΄λ ν°λ―Έλ μ¬λ‘μ‘°μ¬ λ° λΆμ 27
4.1 λΉμμ°μ± νλμ μ μ λ° λ°μμμΈ 27
4.2 P ν°λ―Έλμ λΉμμ°μ± νλ λΆμ 28
4.3 λ²€μΉλ§νΉ ν΄μΈ ν°λ―Έλ λ° P ν°λ―Έλκ³Όμ λΉκ΅λΆμ 35
4.4 λΉμμ°μ± νλμ μ°κ΅¬λ²μ 41
4.5 λΉμμ°μ± νλμ μκ΄κ΄κ³ λΆμ 47
4.6 μμ¬μ λΆμ 49
μ 5 μ₯ κ²° λ‘ 51
5.1 κ²°λ‘ 51
5.2 μ°κ΅¬μ νκ³μ λ° ν₯νκ³Όμ 52
μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν 54
λ³μ²¨ 56Maste
Analysis of Developmental Trajectories of Career Maturity in College Students
λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬μ λͺ©μ μ μ°λ¦¬λλΌ λνμμ μκ°μ κ²½κ³Όμ λ°λ₯Έ μ§λ‘μ±μλμ μ νλ³ λ³νκΆ€μ μ νμ
νκ³ , μ§λ‘μ±μλμ μ νλ³ λ³νκΆ€μ μ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μμΈμ΄ 무μμΈμ§ ꡬλͺ
νλ κ²μ΄λ€. μ΄ μ°κ΅¬μμλ βνκ΅κ΅μ‘μ’
λ¨2005βμ 5μ°¨λ
λ(2009λ
), 7μ°¨λ
λ(2011λ
), 9μ°¨λ
λ(2014λ
) μΈ μμ μ μλ£λ₯Ό μ΄μ©νμλ€. 5μ°¨λ
λλ νλ³Έμ΄ κ³ λ±νκ΅ 2νλ
μΈ ν΄μ΄κ³ , 7μ°¨λ
λλ νλ³Έμ΄ κ³ λ±νκ΅λ₯Ό μ‘Έμ
νκ³ λνμ μ
ννλ ν΄μ΄λ©°, 9μ°¨λ
λλ νλ³Έμ΄ κ³ λ±νκ΅λ₯Ό μ‘Έμ
νκ³ 4λ
μ΄ λλ ν΄μλ€. μ΅μ’
μ μΌλ‘ 9μ°¨λ
λ κΈ°μ€ 4λ
μ λνμ μ¬ν μ€μ΄λ©° λνμμ© μ€λ¬Έμ μλ΅ν 1,390λͺ
μ μλ£λ₯Ό λΆμνμλ€. μ§λ‘μ±μλ λ³νκΆ€μ μ μμ νΉμ±μ λΆμνκΈ° μν΄μλ μ±μ₯νΌν©λͺ¨ν λΆμμ, μ§λ‘μ±μλ κΆ€μ μ§λ¨μ κ²°μ μμΈμ νμ
νκΈ° μν΄μλ λ€νλ‘μ§μ€ν± νκ·λΆμμ μ΄μ©νμλ€. μ£Όμ μ°κ΅¬κ²°κ³Όλ λ€μκ³Ό κ°λ€. 첫째, μ°λ¦¬λλΌ λνμμ μ§λ‘μ±μλ λ³νκΆ€μ μ κ³ μμ€μ μ§ν, μ€μμ€μ μ§ν, μ μμ€μ¦κ°νμ μΈ κ°λ‘ νμΈλμλ€. λμ§Έ, κ°μΈ νΉμ±μμλ μ±λ³, νλ¬Έμ μμκ°λ
, λΉνλ¬Έμ μμκ°λ
, μκΈ°μ£Όλνμ΅μ΄, κ°μ νΉμ±μμλ λΆλͺ¨νλ ₯, κ³ λ±νκ΅μν μ λΆλͺ¨μ μ μμ μ§μμ΄, νκ΅ νΉμ±μμλ λνμνμ μμ΄ μ μμ€μ¦κ°ν λλΉ κ³ μμ€μ μ§νκ³Ό μ€μμ€μ μ§νμ μ§λ‘μ±μλ λ³νκΆ€μ μ κ²°μ νλ κ³΅ν΅ μμΈμΌλ‘ λνλ¬λ€.The purpose of this study was to identify the developmental trajectories of career maturity among college students in Korea and to examine relevant variables that have significant effects on the trajectory groups of career maturity. This study used three waves of data from Korean Education Longitudinal Study 2005 (KELS 2005): 5th year (2009), 7th year (2011) and 9th year (2014). A total of 1,390 students who are enrolled in four-year college based on 9th year study were analyzed. They were categorized into male(545) and female(845) to be analyzed. The Growth Mixture Model(GMM) and the multinomial logistic regression model were mainly used for data analysis. The major findings were as follows: First, three distinct trajectories of career maturity were found; high-level maintaining, mid-level maintaining and low-level increasing groups. Second, the variables that had significant effects on trajectory groups of career maturity for all students were gender, academic self-concept, non-academic self-concept, self-directed learning, academic background of parents, emotional support from parents in high-school, and college life adjustments