5 research outputs found

    A Study on the Non-productive Movement in Container Terminal

    Get PDF
    The container liners have strived in order to survive from persistence crisis by seeking the most efficient vessel operation with different ways such as Merger & Acquisition (M&A), reorganizing the alliance, awarding mega vessel and so on since 2010. On this fierce competition the largest shipping line in Korea, Han-jin Shipping Line, went into receivership and drove the company into bankruptcy. On the other hand, the larger shipping line which succeed to survive from the game have consistently been forcing the terminal operator to achieve the lower tariff with better service. In order to break through, terminal operators have reinforced investment with improving terminal system and automation with high-tech equipment. With those tremendous efforts, however, terminal operators are still confronting difficulties including β€œNon-productive Movement” which is one of the biggest challenge in operation. In this thesis, we verify the definition of non-productive movement, proportion and effect in real operation by analyzing the cases. To address non-productive movement in operation, we've analyzed A container terminal's actual case. As a result, we could identify that those cases are composed of vessel operation(Loading/unloading), In/outbound operation, other terminal operations and unproductive operation which resulted from terminal structure. By this research, we could connect the dots that how the unproductive operations account for overall terminal operation and identify opportunities of improvement for service quality and competitiveness of terminal by improving those problems. However, this thesis aims at justifying the necessity of process improvement for terminal stakeholder such as shipping lines, transportation company and external truck drivers as it's strongly bonded to their benefits as well as terminal operative efficiency improvement provided that terminal's unproductive operation was removed.List of Tables β…± List of Figures β…² Abstract β…³ 제 1 μž₯ μ„œ λ‘  1 1.1 연ꡬ배경 1 1.2 연ꡬλͺ©μ  2 1.3 μ—°κ΅¬λ‚΄μš© 및 방법 4 제 2 μž₯ 선행연ꡬ κ³ μ°° 연ꡬ 5 2.1 κ΅­λ‚΄λ¬Έν—Œ 연ꡬ 5 2.2 κ΅­μ™Έλ¬Έν—Œ 연ꡬ 10 제 3 μž₯ μ»¨ν…Œμ΄λ„ˆ 터미널 일반 및 사둀뢄석 λŒ€μƒ μ†Œκ°œ 12 3.1 μ»¨ν…Œμ΄λ„ˆ ν„°λ―Έλ„μ˜ μ •μ˜ 12 3.2 μ»¨ν…Œμ΄λ„ˆ ν„°λ―Έλ„μ˜ μ‹œμ„€ 및 μž₯λΉ„ 13 3.3 μ»¨ν…Œμ΄λ„ˆ ν„°λ―Έλ„μ˜ ν•˜μ—­μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ˜ μ’…λ₯˜ 19 3.4 사둀뢄석 λŒ€μƒ μ»¨ν…Œμ΄λ„ˆ 터미널 21 제 4 μž₯ μ»¨ν…Œμ΄λ„ˆ 터미널 사둀쑰사 및 뢄석 27 4.1 비생산성 ν™œλ™μ˜ μ •μ˜ 및 λ°œμƒμ›μΈ 27 4.2 P ν„°λ―Έλ„μ˜ 비생산성 ν™œλ™ 뢄석 28 4.3 λ²€μΉ˜λ§ˆν‚Ή ν•΄μ™Έ 터미널 및 P ν„°λ―Έλ„κ³Όμ˜ 비ꡐ뢄석 35 4.4 비생산성 ν™œλ™μ˜ μ—°κ΅¬λ²”μœ„ 41 4.5 비생산성 ν™œλ™μ˜ 상관관계 뢄석 47 4.6 μ‹œμ‚¬μ  뢄석 49 제 5 μž₯ κ²° λ‘  51 5.1 κ²°λ‘  51 5.2 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•œκ³„μ  및 ν–₯ν›„κ³Όμ œ 52 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 54 별첨 56Maste

    Analysis of Developmental Trajectories of Career Maturity in College Students

    No full text
    λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ μ€ μš°λ¦¬λ‚˜λΌ λŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ μ‹œκ°„μ  경과에 λ”°λ₯Έ μ§„λ‘œμ„±μˆ™λ„μ˜ μœ ν˜•λ³„ 변화ꢀ적을 νŒŒμ•…ν•˜κ³ , μ§„λ‘œμ„±μˆ™λ„μ˜ μœ ν˜•λ³„ 변화ꢀ적에 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μš”μΈμ΄ 무엇인지 ꡬλͺ…ν•˜λŠ” 것이닀. 이 μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” β€˜ν•œκ΅­κ΅μœ‘μ’…λ‹¨2005β€™μ˜ 5차년도(2009λ…„), 7차년도(2011λ…„), 9차년도(2014λ…„) μ„Έ μ‹œμ μ˜ 자료λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 5μ°¨λ…„λ„λŠ” ν‘œλ³Έμ΄ 고등학ꡐ 2학년인 해이고, 7μ°¨λ…„λ„λŠ” ν‘œλ³Έμ΄ 고등학ꡐλ₯Ό μ‘Έμ—…ν•˜κ³  λŒ€ν•™μ— μž…ν•™ν•˜λŠ” 해이며, 9μ°¨λ…„λ„λŠ” ν‘œλ³Έμ΄ 고등학ꡐλ₯Ό μ‘Έμ—…ν•˜κ³  4년이 λ˜λŠ” ν•΄μ˜€λ‹€. μ΅œμ’…μ μœΌλ‘œ 9차년도 κΈ°μ€€ 4λ…„μ œ λŒ€ν•™μ— μž¬ν•™ 쀑이며 λŒ€ν•™μƒμš© 섀문에 μ‘λ‹΅ν•œ 1,390λͺ…μ˜ 자료λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ§„λ‘œμ„±μˆ™λ„ λ³€ν™”κΆ€μ μ˜ μˆ˜μ™€ νŠΉμ„±μ„ λΆ„μ„ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” μ„±μž₯ν˜Όν•©λͺ¨ν˜• 뢄석을, μ§„λ‘œμ„±μˆ™λ„ κΆ€μ μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ κ²°μ •μš”μΈμ„ νŒŒμ•…ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” λ‹€ν•­λ‘œμ§€μŠ€ν‹± νšŒκ·€λΆ„μ„μ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ£Όμš” μ—°κ΅¬κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. 첫째, μš°λ¦¬λ‚˜λΌ λŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ μ§„λ‘œμ„±μˆ™λ„ 변화ꢀ적은 κ³ μˆ˜μ€€μœ μ§€ν˜•, μ€‘μˆ˜μ€€μœ μ§€ν˜•, μ €μˆ˜μ€€μ¦κ°€ν˜•μ˜ μ„Έ 개둜 ν™•μΈλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έ, 개인 νŠΉμ„±μ—μ„œλŠ” 성별, 학문적 μžμ•„κ°œλ…, 비학문적 μžμ•„κ°œλ…, μžκΈ°μ£Όλ„ν•™μŠ΅μ΄, κ°€μ • νŠΉμ„±μ—μ„œλŠ” λΆ€λͺ¨ν•™λ ₯, κ³ λ“±ν•™κ΅μƒν™œ μ‹œ λΆ€λͺ¨μ˜ μ •μ„œμ  지원이, 학ꡐ νŠΉμ„±μ—μ„œλŠ” λŒ€ν•™μƒν™œμ μ‘μ΄ μ €μˆ˜μ€€μ¦κ°€ν˜• λŒ€λΉ„ κ³ μˆ˜μ€€μœ μ§€ν˜•κ³Ό μ€‘μˆ˜μ€€μœ μ§€ν˜•μ˜ μ§„λ‘œμ„±μˆ™λ„ 변화ꢀ적을 κ²°μ •ν•˜λŠ” 곡톡 μš”μΈμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€.The purpose of this study was to identify the developmental trajectories of career maturity among college students in Korea and to examine relevant variables that have significant effects on the trajectory groups of career maturity. This study used three waves of data from Korean Education Longitudinal Study 2005 (KELS 2005): 5th year (2009), 7th year (2011) and 9th year (2014). A total of 1,390 students who are enrolled in four-year college based on 9th year study were analyzed. They were categorized into male(545) and female(845) to be analyzed. The Growth Mixture Model(GMM) and the multinomial logistic regression model were mainly used for data analysis. The major findings were as follows: First, three distinct trajectories of career maturity were found; high-level maintaining, mid-level maintaining and low-level increasing groups. Second, the variables that had significant effects on trajectory groups of career maturity for all students were gender, academic self-concept, non-academic self-concept, self-directed learning, academic background of parents, emotional support from parents in high-school, and college life adjustments
    corecore