36 research outputs found

    Effect of Information on mood state and support behavior of mothers in emergency room for their children

    No full text
    ์ง€์—ญ์‚ฌํšŒ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ์‘๊ธ‰์‹ค์„ ๋‚ด์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์•„๋™๊ณผ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ๋Š” ๋‚ฏ์„  ์‘๊ธ‰์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ ์„ค๋ช…๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ์™€ ์นจ์Šต์  ์ฒ˜์น˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค๋ฅผ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๊ณ  ์ค€๋น„ ์—†๋Š” ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ์•„๋™์˜ ์ƒํƒœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋Œ€์ฒ˜ํ•˜๊ณ , ์•„๋™์„ ์–ด๋–ค ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋„์™€์ฃผ์–ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ณ ํ†ต๊ณผ ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์„ ๋Š๋ผ๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋ฏ€๋กœ ์•„๋™์˜ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ์‘๊ธ‰์‹ค ์ƒํ™ฉ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•œ ์ •๋ณด์™€ ๋Œ€์ฒ˜๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์—ฌ ์•„๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ€๋ชจ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ™•๋ฆฝํ•˜๊ณ  ์•„๋™์˜ ๋Œ๋ด„์„ ์ง€์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ฆ์ง„์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ค‘์žฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.์ด์— ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์•„๋™์ด ์‘๊ธ‰์‹ค์—์„œ ๊ณตํ†ต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ์™€ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๊ณผ์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ด๊ณ  ๊ฐ๊ด€ํ™”๋œ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ , ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ถ„์ƒํƒœ์™€ ์•„๋™ ์ง€์ง€ํ–‰์œ„์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์„ค๊ณ„๋Š” ๋น„๋™๋“ฑ์„ฑ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ ์‚ฌ์ „ ์‚ฌํ›„ ์„ค๊ณ„์— ์˜ํ•œ ์œ ์‚ฌ ์‹คํ—˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋Œ€์ƒ์€ E ์˜๋ฃŒ์› ์‘๊ธ‰์‹ค์„ ๋‚ด์›ํ•œ ์œ ์•„ ๋ฐ ํ•™๋ น์ „๊ธฐ ์•„๋™ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ, ๊ทธ ์ค‘ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž ์„ ์ • ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋งž๋Š” ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ 30๋ช…, ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ 30๋ช…์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž๋ฃŒ์ˆ˜์ง‘๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์€ 2005๋…„ 10์›” 21์ผ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 11์›” 6์ผ๊นŒ์ง€ 17์ผ๊ฐ„ ์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ž๋ฃŒ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ๊ณผ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 30๋ช…์—๊ฒŒ ์„ค๋ฌธ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ๊ด€์ฐฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋…๋ฆฝ๋ณ€์ธ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๊ฐ€ ์ œ์ž‘ ํ•œ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ •๋ณด ํŒœํ”Œ๋ ›์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ข…์†๋ณ€์ธ์€ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ถ„์ƒํƒœ์™€ ์•„๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ ์ง€์ง€ํ–‰์œ„์ด๋‹ค.์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋„๊ตฌ๋กœ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ์˜ ์•„๋™ ์ง€์ง€ํ–‰์œ„๋Š” Melnyk(1994)์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ  ๊น€์„ ๊ตฌ ๋“ฑ(1999)์ด ํ•œ๊ตญ ๋ถ€๋ชจ์˜ ์ •์„œ์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜์ • ๋ณด์™„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์„, ๊ธฐ๋ถ„์ƒํƒœ์ฒ™๋„๋Š” McNair, Lorr ์™€ Droppleman (1992)์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ถ„์ƒํƒœ ์ธก์ • ๋„๊ตฌ(Profile of Mood States, POMS)๋ฅผ ์‹ ์œคํฌ(1996)๊ฐ€ ํ•œ๊ตญ ๋ฌธํ™”์— ๋งž๋„๋ก ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํƒ€๋‹นํ™”์‹œํ‚จ ๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ์˜ ์ •์„œ์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž์™€ ์•„๋™๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ•™ ๊ต์ˆ˜ 1์ธ์ด ํ•ฉ์˜ํ•˜์— ์ˆ˜์ •․๋ณด์™„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋™์ผํ•œ ๋„๊ตฌ๋กœ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ๋„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ถ„์„์€ ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” SPSS/PC+WIN์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ผ๋ฐ˜์  ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋™์งˆ์„ฑ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์€ ฯ‡ยฒ-test์™€ t-test, Fisher''s exact test๋ฅผ, ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ถ„์ƒํƒœ์™€ ์ง€์ง€ํ–‰์œ„์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” paired t-test๋กœ, ํ‰๊ท ๋น„๊ต๋Š” t-test๋กœ, ๊ด€๋ จ์„ฑ ๋น„๊ต๋Š” Fisher''s exact test๋กœ, ์˜์—ญ๋ณ„ ๋น„๊ต๋Š” ANOVA test๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.์ฒซ์งธ, โ€œ์ •๋ณด์ œ๊ณต์„ ๋ฐ›์€ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ถ„์ƒํƒœ๋Š” ์ •๋ณด์ œ๊ณต์„ ๋ฐ›๊ธฐ ์ „๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •๋ณด์ œ๊ณต์„ ๋ฐ›์€ ํ›„์— ์ข‹์•„์งˆ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹คโ€๋ผ๋Š” ์ œ 1 ๊ฐ€์„ค์€ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง€์ง€๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค(t=3.543, P=0.001).๋‘˜์งธ, โ€œ์ •๋ณด์ œ๊ณต์„ ๋ฐ›์€ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ์˜ ์ง€์ง€ํ–‰์œ„๋Š” ์ •๋ณด์ œ๊ณต์„ ๋ฐ›๊ธฐ ์ „๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›„์— ์ข‹์•„์งˆ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹คโ€๋ผ๋Š” ์ œ 2 ๊ฐ€์„ค์€ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง€์ง€๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค (t= -10.934, p=0.000).์ด์ƒ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉํ•ด ๋ณผ ๋•Œ, ์‘๊ธ‰์‹ค์—์„œ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ •๋ณด์ œ๊ณต์€ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ถ„์ƒํƒœ์™€ ์•„๋™ ์ง€์ง€ํ–‰์œ„์— ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์‘๊ธ‰์‹ค์—์„œ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ •๋ณด์ œ๊ณต์€ ์‘๊ธ‰์‹ค ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์ง€์นจ์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๋ฟ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ํƒ€ ์งˆํ™˜์ž์˜ ์‘๊ธ‰์‹ค ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ ์‹œ ๊ต์œก์ž๋ฃŒ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์˜ ์ดˆ์„์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฆฌ๋ผ ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ๋œ๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ]The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of information on the mothers'' mood and support behaviors when invasive procedure for children who visit emergency room. Research design was non-equivalent Quasi-experiment. The dependent variable was information giving and the dependent variable was mood state and support behavior of the mothers.The study subjects were mothers whose child were toddlers and preschoolers in emergency room. Total subjects were 30 mothers in the treatment group and 30 mothers in the control group.The data collection was carried out at the emergency room, E university hospital from Oct. 21, 2005 to Nov. 6, 2005 for 17 years.The instruments used in this study were; The Profile of Mood States(POMS) of McNair, Lorr and Droppleman(1992) and Index of mother''s support Behavior during invasive procedure was developed by Melnyk(1994).The data analysis was carried out using the ฯ‡ยฒ-test and t-test and Fisher''s exact test for evaluating homogeneity of the subject, the paired t-test for evaluating mothers'' mood status and changes of support behaviors, the t-test for evaluating average comparison and component comparison, the Fisher''s exact test for analysis of relevance.The results from this study were following.The hypothesis I. "Mothers'' mood status be better after they received the information was supported and it was statistically significant (t=3.543, P=0.001).The hypothesis II. "Mothers'' support behavior who received the information be better after they received the information" was supported and it was statistically significant(t= -10.934, p=0.000).In conclusion, the nursing information to the mothers for their children in emergency room had positive effect on the mother''s mood status and support behavior for the children. Based on the result of this study recommend that nursing information should be included in the routine nursing care activities in emergency room.ope

    The Taming of the Shrew: A Reading as a Text of Comedy

    No full text
    corecore