Matroids with at least two regular elements

For a matroid $M$, an element $e$ such that both $M\backslash e$ and $M/e$ are regular is called a regular element of $M$. We determine completely the structure of non-regular matroids with at least two regular elements. Besides four small size matroids, all 3-connected matroids in the class can be pieced together from $F_7$ or $S_8$ and a regular matroid using 3-sums. This result takes a step toward solving a problem posed by Paul Seymour: Find all 3-connected non-regular matroids with at least one regular element [5, 14.8.8]

Splitters and Decomposers for Binary Matroids

Let $EX[M_1\dots, M_k]$ denote the class of binary matroids with no minors isomorphic to $M_1, \dots, M_k$. In this paper we give a decomposition theorem for $EX[S_{10}, S_{10}^*]$, where $S_{10}$ is a certain 10-element rank-4 matroid. As corollaries we obtain decomposition theorems for the classes obtained by excluding the Kuratowski graphs $EX[M(K_{3,3}), M^*(K_{3,3}), M(K_5), M^*(K_5)]$ and $EX[M(K_{3,3}), M^*(K_{3,3})]$. These decomposition theorems imply results on internally $4$-connected matroids by Zhou [\ref{Zhou2004}], Qin and Zhou [\ref{Qin2004}], and Mayhew, Royle and Whitte [\ref{Mayhewsubmitted}].Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1403.775

Unlabeled equivalence for matroids representable over finite fields

We present a new type of equivalence for representable matroids that uses the automorphisms of the underlying matroid. Two $r\times n$ matrices $A$ and $A'$ representing the same matroid $M$ over a field $F$ are {\it geometrically equivalent representations} of $M$ if one can be obtained from the other by elementary row operations, column scaling, and column permutations. Using geometric equivalence, we give a method for exhaustively generating non-isomorphic matroids representable over a finite field $GF(q)$, where $q$ is a power of a prime

A decomposition theorem for binary matroids with no prism minor

The prism graph is the dual of the complete graph on five vertices with an edge deleted, $K_5\backslash e$. In this paper we determine the class of binary matroids with no prism minor. The motivation for this problem is the 1963 result by Dirac where he identified the simple 3-connected graphs with no minor isomorphic to the prism graph. We prove that besides Dirac's infinite families of graphs and four infinite families of non-regular matroids determined by Oxley, there are only three possibilities for a matroid in this class: it is isomorphic to the dual of the generalized parallel connection of $F_7$ with itself across a triangle with an element of the triangle deleted; it's rank is bounded by 5; or it admits a non-minimal exact 3-separation induced by the 3-separation in $P_9$. Since the prism graph has rank 5, the class has to contain the binary projective geometries of rank 3 and 4, $F_7$ and $PG(3, 2)$, respectively. We show that there is just one rank 5 extremal matroid in the class. It has 17 elements and is an extension of $R_{10}$, the unique splitter for regular matroids. As a corollary, we obtain Dillon, Mayhew, and Royle's result identifying the binary internally 4-connected matroids with no prism minor [5]

Trailing edge noise theory for rotating blades in uniform flow

This paper presents a new formulation for trailing edge noise radiation from rotating blades based on an analytical solution of the convective wave equation. It accounts for distributed loading and the effect of mean flow and spanwise wavenumber. A commonly used theory due to Schlinker and Amiet (1981) predicts trailing edge noise radiation from rotating blades. However, different versions of the theory exist; it is not known which version is the correct one and what the range of validity of the theory is. This paper addresses both questions by deriving Schlinker and Amiet's theory in a simple way and by comparing it to the new formulation, using model blade elements representative of a wind turbine, a cooling fan and an aircraft propeller. The correct form of Schlinker and Amiet's theory (1981) is identified. It is valid at high enough frequency, i.e. for a Helmholtz number relative to chord greater than one and a rotational frequency much smaller than the angular frequency of the noise sources.Comment: 28 pages, 10 figures, submitted to Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences (final revision