22 research outputs found

    Resveratrol and Pterostilbene Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 Replication in Air-Liquid Interface Cultured Human Primary Bronchial Epithelial Cells

    Get PDF
    The current COVID-19 pandemic is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has an enormous impact on human health and economy. In search for therapeutic options, researchers have proposed resveratrol, a food supplement with known antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties as an advantageous antiviral therapy for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here, we provide evidence that both resveratrol and its metabolically more stable structural analog, pterostilbene, exhibit potent antiviral properties against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. First, we show that resveratrol and pterostilbene antiviral activity in African green monkey kidney cells. Both compounds actively inhibit virus replication within infected cells as reduced virus progeny production was observed when the compound was added at post-inoculation conditions. Without replenishment of the compound, antiviral activity was observed up to roughly five rounds of replication, demonstrating the long-lasting effect of these compounds. Second, as the upper respiratory tract represents the initial site of SARS-CoV-2 replication, we also assessed antiviral activity in air–liquid interface (ALI) cultured human primary bronchial epithelial cells, isolated from healthy volunteers. Resveratrol and pterostilbene showed a strong antiviral effect in these cells up to 48 h post-infection. Collectively, our data indicate that resveratrol and pterostilbene are promising antiviral compounds to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection. Because these results represent laboratory findings in cells, we advocate evaluation of these compounds in clinical trials before statements are made whether these drugs are advantageous for COVID-19 treatment

    Stereotactic cyst aspiration directly followed by Gamma Knife radiosurgery for large cystic brain metastases

    Get PDF
    Background: Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been proven to be a successful primary treatment for metastatic brain tumors (BM). BM can come in cystic lesions and are often too large for GKRS. An alternative approach to treat cystic BM is stereotactic cyst aspiration (SCA) for volume reduction, making it suitable for GKRS afterwards. Objective: Our objective is evaluation of volumetric reduction after SCA, tumor control, and complications after SCA directly followed by GKRS. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent SCA directly followed by GKRS at the Gamma Knife Center of the Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital in Tilburg between 2002 and 2015. In total, 54 patients had undergone this combined approach. Two patients were excluded because of prior intracranial treatment. The other 52 patients were included for analysis. Results: SCA resulted in a mean volumetric reduction of 56.5% (range 5.50–87.00%). In 83.6% of the tumors (46 tumors), SCA led to sufficient volumetric reduction making GKRS possible. The overall local tumor control (OLTC) of the aspirated lesions post-GKRS was 60.9% (28 out of 46 tumors). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 3 (range 5 days–14 months) and 12 months (range 5 days–58 months), respectively. Leptomeningeal disease was reported in 5 (9.6%) cases. Conclusion: SCA directly followed by GKRS is an effective and time-efficient treatment for large cystic BM in selected patients in which surgery is contraindicated and those with deeply located lesions

    Factors Associated with Revision Surgery after Internal Fixation of Hip Fractures

    Get PDF
    Background: Femoral neck fractures are associated with high rates of revision surgery after management with internal fixation. Using data from the Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip fractures (FAITH) trial evaluating methods of internal fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures, we investigated associations between baseline and surgical factors and the need for revision surgery to promote healing, relieve pain, treat infection or improve function over 24 months postsurgery. Additionally, we investigated factors associated with (1) hardware removal and (2) implant exchange from cancellous screws (CS) or sliding hip screw (SHS) to total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or another internal fixation device. Methods: We identified 15 potential factors a priori that may be associated with revision surgery, 7 with hardware removal, and 14 with implant exchange. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses in our investigation. Results: Factors associated with increased risk of revision surgery included: female sex, [hazard ratio (HR) 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.50; P = 0.001], higher body mass index (fo

    HRM- en integriteitsbeleid in de (semi-)publieke sector

    No full text

    The role of marginal dose on tumor control in vestibular schwannoma: a large single institution matched cohort study

    No full text
    Recently we published the tumor control and complication rates in a large cohort of patients who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for incidental vestibular schwannoma (VS) in the Netherlands [1]. All these patients were uniformly treated with a marginal dose of 11 Gy. Tumor control compared slightly unfavorably with the rates reported in other large studies. Assuming that these differences were directly attributable to the used dosimetry we changed our treatment protocol in 2010 to a marginal dose of 13 Gy. However, by reviewing the literature we noticed that other factors than dosimetry might have an important effect on the reported outcomes. These include variations in treatment indication, i.e treatment of growing or stable tumors, and median tumor size. Also, the definition of treatment failure differs, and can be based on either clinical symptoms, or radiological progression. Furthermore, radiological defined progression is different between 2 dimensional or volumetric assessments. These factors make comparison between different studies difficult. Consequently, the role of the lower marginal dose used in our reported series is a doubtful explanation of the lower observed tumor control rate in comparison to other studies. The two large cohorts of patients treated in our institution with either 11 or 13 gy provide an opportunity to evaluate the effect of the dosimetry on tumor control. We excluded the above-mentioned possible confounders, by a matching for treatment indication (only documented growth) and tumor size, age and sex. Outcome wil be based on robust criteria with the use of volumetric tumor assessment. [1] Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: evaluation of tumor control and its predictors in a large patient cohort in The Netherlands. Klijn S, Verheul JB, Beute GN1, Leenstra S, Mulder JJ, Kunst HP, Hanssens PE J Neurosurg. 2015 Oct 2:1-8

    <i>Semiquantitative</i> RT-PCR analyses of most prevalent OPN receptors in cultivated ONH astrocytes and effect of TGF-β2.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Representative RT-PCR results of OPN receptor gene expression in untreated (co) and TGF-β2 (1 ng/ml, 72 h) treated ONH astrocytes. (B) Densitometric analysis of <i>sq</i> RT-PCR results does not demonstrate any regulation of OPN receptors in TGF-β2 treated cells compared to controls. OPN signal is normalized to GAPDH. Values represent mean ± SD of 11 independent experiments (n = 11).</p

    Moxidectin and ivermectin inhibit sars-cov-2 replication in vero e6 cells but not in human primary airway epithelium cells

    Get PDF
    Antiviral therapies are urgently needed to treat and limit the development of severe COVID-19 disease. Ivermectin, a broad-spectrum anti-parasitic agent, has been shown to have anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity in Vero cells at a concentration of 5 μM. These limited in vitro results triggered the investigation of ivermectin as a treatment option to alleviate COVID-19 disease. However, in April 2021, the World Health Organization stated the following: “The current evidence on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 patients is inconclusive.” It is speculated that the in vivo concentration of ivermectin is too low to exert a strong antiviral effect. Here, we performed a head-to-head comparison of the antiviral activity of ivermectin and the structurally related, but metabolically more stable moxidectin in multiple in vitro models of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including physiologically relevant human respiratory epithelial cells. Both moxidectin and ivermectin exhibited antiviral activity in Vero E6 cells. Subsequent experiments revealed that these compounds predominantly act on the steps following virus cell entry. Surprisingly, however, in human-airway-derived cell models, both moxidectin and ivermectin failed to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection, even at concentrations of 10 μM. These disappointing results call for a word of caution in the interpretation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of drugs solely based on their activity in Vero cells. Altogether, these findings suggest that even using a high-dose regimen of ivermectin, or switching to another drug in the same class, is unlikely to be useful for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 in humans
    corecore