Burden of illness of hip fractures in elderly Dutch patients

Summary: Patients with hip fractures experience reduced health-related quality of life and have a reduced life expectancy. Patients’ utilization of healthcare leads to costs to society. The results of the study can be used in future economic evaluations of treatments for hip fractures. Purpose: Hip fractures are associated with high mortality, reduced quality of life, and increased healthcare utilization, leading to an economic burden to society. The purpose of this study is to determine the burden of illness of hip fractures in elderly Dutch patients for specific time periods after surgery. Methods: Patients with a hip fracture above the age of 65 were included in the study. In the 1-year period after surgery, patients were asked to complete a set of questionnaires pre-injury (retrospectively), and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery. The set of questionnaires included the Euroqol 5D (EQ-5D-3L), the iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) and iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ). Health-related quality of life was calculated using Dutch tariffs. Costs were calculated using the methodology described in the Dutch costing manual. Results: Approximately 20% of patients with a hip fracture died within 1 year. Health-related quality of life was significantly reduced compared to pre-injury values, and patients did not recover to their pre-injury values within 1 year. Total costs in the first year after injury were €27,573, of which 10% were due to costs of the procedure (€2706). Total follow-up costs (€24,876) were predominantly consisting of healthcare costs. Monthly costs decreased over time. Conclusions: Hip fractures lead to a burden to patients, resulting from mortality and health-related quality of life reductions, and to society, due to (healthcare) costs. The results of this study can be used in future economic evaluations

Hip fractures in elderly people:Surgery or no surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Iintroduction:  Increasing numbers of patients with hip fractures also have advanced comorbidities. A majority are treated surgically. However, a significantly increasing percentage of medically unfit patients with unacceptably high risk of perioperative death are treated nonoperatively. Important questions about patients' prefracture quality of life (QOL) and future perspectives should be asked before considering different treatment options to assess what kind of treatment is advisable in frail elderly high-risk patients with a hip fracture. Objective:  The aim of this review was to provide an overview of differences in mortality, health-related QOL [(HR)QOL], functional outcome, and costs between nonoperative management (NOM) and operative management (OM) of hip fractures in patients above 65 years. Methods:  A systematic literature search was performed in EMBASE, OvidSP, PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science for observational studies and trials. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials comparing NOM with OM in hip fracture patients were selected. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed according to the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) or Furlan checklist. Results:  Seven observational studies were included with a total of 1189 patients, of whom 242 (20.3%) were treated conservatively. The methodological quality of the studies was moderate (mean: 14.7, standard deviation [SD]: 1.5). The 30-day and 1-year mortalities were higher in the nonoperative group (odds ratio [OR]: 3.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-10.96; OR: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.57-9.41). None of the included studies compared QOL, functional outcome, or health-care costs between the 2 groups. Conclusion:  This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that only a few studies with small number of patients comparing NOM with OM were published. A significantly higher 30-day and 1-year mortality was revealed in nonoperatively treated hip fracture patients. No data were found examining (HR)QOL and costs. Further work is needed to enable shared decision-making and to initiate NOM in frail elderly patients with advanced comorbidity and limited life expectancy

Health status and psychological outcomes after trauma: A prospective multicenter cohort study

Introduction Survival after trauma has considerably improved. This warrants research on non-fatal outcome. We aimed to identify characteristics associated with both short and long-term health status (HS) after trauma and to describe the recovery patterns of HS and psychological outcomes during 24 months of follow-up. Methods Hospitalized patients with all types of injuries were included. Data were collected at 1 week 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-trauma. HS was assessed with the EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D3L) and the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3 (HUI2/3). For the screening of symptoms of post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression, the Impact of Event Scale (IES) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) subscale anxiety (HADSA) and subscale depression (HADSD) were used. Recovery patterns of HS and psychological outcomes were examined with linear mixed model analyses. Results A total of 4,883 patients participated (median age 68 (Interquartile range 53–80); 50% response rate). The mean (Standard Deviation (SD)) pre-injury EQ-5D-3L score was 0.85 (0.23). One week post-trauma, mean (SD) EQ-5D-3L, HUI2 and HUI3 scores were 0.49 (0.32), 0.61 (0.22) and 0.38 (0.31), respectively. These scores significantly improved to 0.77 (0.26), 0.77 (0.21) and 0.62 (0.35), respectively, at 24 months. Most recovery occurred up until 3 months. At long-term follow-up, patients of higher age, with comorbidities, longer hospital stay, lower extremity fracture and spine injury showed lower HS. The mean (SD) scores of the IES, HADSA and HADSD were respectively 14.80 (15.80), 4.92 (3.98) and 5.00 (4.28), respectively, at 1 week post-trauma and slightly improved over 24 months post-trauma to 10.35 (14.72), 4.31 (3.76) and 3.62 (3.87), respectively. Discussion HS and psychological symptoms improved over time and most improvements occurred within 3 months post-trauma. The effects of severity and type of injury faded out over time. Patients frequently reported symptoms of post-traumatic stress. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02508675

The value of nonoperative versus operative treatment of frail institutionalized elderly patients with a proximal femoral fracture in the shade of life (FRAIL-HIP); protocol for a multicenter observational cohort study

BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral fractures are strongly associated with morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. Mortality is highest among frail institutionalized elderly with both physical and cognitive comorbidities who consequently have a limited life expectancy. Evidence based guidelines on whether or not to operate on these patients in the case of a proximal femoral fracture are lacking. Practice variation occurs, and it remains unknown if nonoperative treatment would result in at least the same quality of life as operative treatment. This study aims to determine the effect of nonoperative management versus operative management of proximal femoral fractures in a selected group of frail institutionalized elderly on the quality of life, level of pain, rate of complications, time to death, satisfaction of the patient (or proxy) and the caregiver with the management strategy, and health care consumption. METHODS: This is a multicenter, observational cohort study. Frail institutionalized elderly (70 years or older with a body mass index < 18.5, a Functional Ambulation Category of 2 or lower pre-trauma, or an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 4 or 5), who sustained a proximal femoral fracture are eligible to participate. Patients with a pathological or periprosthetic fractures and known metastatic oncological disease will be excluded. Treatment decision will be reached following a structured shared decision process. The primary outcome is quality of life (Euro-QoL; EQ-5D-5 L). Secondary outcome measures are quality of life measured with the QUALIDEM, pain level (PACSLAC), pain medication use, treatment satisfaction of patient (or proxy) and caregivers, quality of dying (QODD), time to death, and direct medical costs. A cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis will be done, using the EQ-5D utility score and QUALIDEM score, respectively. Non-inferiority of nonoperative treatment is assumed with a limit of 0.15 on the EQ-5D score. Data will be acquired at 7, 14, and 30 days and at 3 and 6 months after trauma. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide insight into the true value of nonoperative treatment of proximal femoral fractures in frail elderly with a limited life expectancy. The results may be used for updating (inter)national treatment guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is re

Outcome after hip fracture in older patients: medical decision-making, quality of life and societal impact

Publiekssamenvatting Een heupfractuur, in de volksmond een gebroken heup, is een ernstige aandoening bij ouderen ten gevolge van een val, vaak in de eigen woonomgeving. Heupfracturen komen wereldwijd frequent voor (circa 4,5 miljoen per jaar) en hebben grote gevolgen voor zowel de patiënt (verminderde kwaliteit van leven (KvL) en hoge kans op overlijden) als de samenleving (impact op mantelzorgers en zorgkosten). Het merendeel van de patiënten wordt geopereerd, maar de sterfte is al tientallen jaren nagenoeg onveranderd. Tevens zien we meer en meer kwetsbare patiënten, mede door de stijgende levensverwachting. In dit proefschrift is onderzocht wat een heupfractuur betekent voor de kwaliteit van leven van de patiënt, de maatschappelijke impact en wat noodzakelijk is voor betere medische besluitvorming. Kwaliteit van leven Een heupfractuur is een van de belangrijkste oorzaken van ziekenhuisopnames bij oudere patiënten en leidt tot verlies van zelfstandigheid. In de Brabant Injury Outcome Surveillance (BIOS), een prospectieve multicenter cohortstudie, werden 696 patiënten met een heupfractuur gedurende 1 jaar gevolgd met behulp van vragenlijsten. In totaal werden 371 patiënten (53,3%) als kwetsbaar beschouwd. Zesendertig procent van de heupfractuurpatiënten ervoer na 1 week psychologische problemen, zoals symptomen van angst of depressie. Na 1 jaar betrof dit nog altijd 31%. Kwetsbaarheid, gemeten met een vragenlijst, ten tijde van de heupfractuur was de meest voorspellende variabele voor het ontwikkelen van symptomen van angst en depressie én voor een (sterk) verminderde kwaliteit van leven. Vroege herkenning van de mate van kwetsbaarheid ten tijde van een heupfractuur is dus zeer belangrijk voor het inschatten van de prognose en het plannen van de zorg. Maatschappelijke impact Ruim 120 mantelzorgers werden geïnterviewd, waarbij ze frequent relationele, fysieke en mentale gezondheidsproblemen ervoeren door het verlenen van mantelzorg aan naasten met een heupfractuur. Wel bleek de zorg-gerelateerde KvL vrij hoog, mede gezien de voldoening bij het verlenen van mantelzorg. De gemiddelde waarde van de kwaliteit van de levensjaren (QALY) was significant hoger voor patiënten die niet als kwetsbaar werden beschouwd. Kosten voor kwetsbare patiënten (gemiddeld €33.942) waren hoger dan voor niet-kwetsbare patiënten (gemiddeld €16.044). Medische besluitvorming Op basis van data van ruim 900 geopereerde heupfractuurpatiënten van 65 jaar en ouder is de Brabant Hip Fracture Score (BHFS) ontwikkelt, waarmee de 30-dagen en 1-jaars sterfte kan worden voorspeld. Voor deze prognose wordt gekeken naar aspecten als leeftijd, geslacht, al dan niet wonend in verpleeghuis, hemoglobine gehalte, longziekte (COPD), diabetes, kwaadaardige aandoeningen, cognitieve beperkingen en nierfalen. De BHFS kan zorgprofessionals, patiënten en familie ondersteunen bij de medische besluitvorming. Tevens hebben we onder Nederlandse gezondheidszorgprofessionals factoren geïdentificeerd die van invloed zijn op de keuze voor een operatief of conservatief beleid bij kwetsbare ouderen. Deze factoren werden vertaald in een keuzehulp, bestaande uit vier items: (1) gezondheidsstatus van voor de heupfractuur; (2) woonachtig in verpleeghuis; (3) mate van kwetsbaarheid; en (4) multimorbiditeit (twee of meer ziekten). Deze keuzehulp identificeert patiënten die mogelijk geschikt zijn om juist een conservatief beleid mee te bespreken. Aanbevelingen Dit proefschrift geeft ondersteuning bij de medische besluitvorming bij kwetsbare ouderen met een heupfractuur. In Nederland is inmiddels in sommige gevallen het niet meer opereren van kwetsbare ouderen met een heupfractuur meer en meer bespreekbaar. Hierbij kan zo nodig palliatieve zorg in een vroeger stadium worden ingezet. Vroege herkenning van de mate van kwetsbaarheid, met een kwetsbaarheidstest, is belangrijk voor het inschatten van de prognose en voor het plannen van de juiste zorg. Er moet meer aandacht zijn voor de behandelwens van zowel patiënt als familie, waarbij ook een rol is weggelegd voor vroegtijdige zorgplanning. Dit is het proces waarbij huisarts of specialist ouderengeneeskunde met patiënt en naasten behandelwensen voor zorg rond het levenseinde bespreekt, vooruitlopend op het moment dat de patiënt zelf niet meer in staat is om beslissingen te nemen. Tevens kan het overleg tussen de eerste en tweede lijn worden geïntensiveerd ten tijde van een kwetsbare heupfractuurpatiënt, om een betere afweging te maken voor de juiste behandeling. Toekomstig onderzoek - de landelijke Frail-Hip studie; een samenwerking tussen geriaters, specialisten ouderengeneeskunde, orthopedisch- en traumachirurgen - zal antwoord moeten geven op de vraag wat het verschil is tussen operatieve en conservatieve behandeling binnen een geselecteerde groep kwetsbare verpleeghuispatiënten met betrekking tot KvL, klinische uitkomsten en kwaliteit van het stervensproces

Quality of life after hip fracture in the elderly: A systematic literature review

Background With an increasing ageing population, hip fractures have become a major public health issue in the elderly. It is important to examine the health status (HS) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of the elderly faced with the epidemic of hip fractures. Objective To provide an overview of reported HS and HRQOL in elderly patients with a hip fracture. Design A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO, Pubmed, and Google Scholar in July 2014. Studies which reported the HS or HRQOL based on standardised questionnaires in patients older than 65 years with a hip fracture were considered eligible for inclusion. Results After inspecting the 2725 potentially eligible studies, 49 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All included studies were randomised controlled trials or prospective cohort studies. The methodological quality of the studies was moderate. Patients’ functioning on the physical, social, and emotional domains were affected after a hip fracture. The HS and HRQOL of the majority of patients recovered in the first 6 months after fracture. However, their HS did not return to prefracture level. Mental state, prefracture functioning on physical and psychosocial domains, comorbidity, female gender, nutritional status, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, and complications were factors associated with HS or HRQOL. Treatment with total hip arthroplasty or hemi-arthroplasty provided better HS than treatment with internal fixation with displaced femoral neck fractures. Supportive psychotherapy in “low-functioning” patients, (home) rehabilitation programmes and nutritional supplementation appeared to have beneficial effects on HS. Conclusions Optimizing nutrition intake, (home) rehabilitation programmes, and the possibility for psychological counselling in patients with difficulties in the psychosocial dimensions would be recommended after hip fracture surgery. Besides HS questionnaires like EQ-5D and SF-36, adequate measurements like the WHOQOL-Bref or ICECAP-O are warranted in future studies regarding hip fracture surgery and postoperative treatment options. Keywords Hip fracture Health-related quality of life, Health status, Elderly, Systematic revie

Predicting health status in the first year after trauma

Analysis and support of clinical decision makin

Validation and reliability of the Abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) in the hospitalized trauma population

Introduction While the number of trauma patients surviving their injury increase, it is important to measure Quality of Life (QoL). The Abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire can be used to assess QoL. However, its psychometric properties in trauma patients are unknown and therefore, we aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF for the hospitalized trauma population. Methods Data were derived from the Brabant Injury Outcome Surveillance. Floor and ceiling effects and missing values of the WHOQOL-BREF were examined. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to examine the underlying 4 dimensions (i.e. physical, psychological, social and environmental) of the questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha (CA) was calculated to determine internal consistency. In total, 42 hypotheses were formulated to determine construct validity and 6 hypotheses were created to determine discriminant validity. To determine construct validity, Spearman’s correlations were calculated between the WHOQOL-BREF and the EuroQol-five-dimension-3-level questionnaire, the Health Utility Index Mark 2 and 3, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Impact of Event Scale. Discriminant validity between patients with minor injuries (i.e. Injury Severity Score (ISS)≤8) and moderate/severe injuries (i.e. ISS ≥ 9) was examined by conducting Mann-Whitney-U-tests. Results In total, 202 patients (median 63y) participated in this study with a median of 32 days (interquartile range 29–37) post-trauma. The WHOQOL-BREF showed no problematic floor and ceiling effects. The CFA revealed a moderate model fit. The domains showed good internal consistency, with the exception of the social domain. All individual items and domain scores of the WHOQOL-BREF showed nearly symmetrical distributions since mean scores were close to median scores, except of the ‘general health’ item. The highest percentage of missing values was found on the ‘sexual activity’ item (i.e. 19.3%). The WHOQOL-BREF showed moderate construct and discriminant validity since in both cases, 67% of the hypotheses were confirmed. Conclusion The present study provides support for using the WHOQOL-BREF for the hospitalized trauma population since the questionnaire appears to be valid and reliable. The WHOQOL-BREF can be used to assess QoL in a heterogeneous group of hospitalized trauma patients accurately

Evaluation of quality of life after nonoperative or operative management of proximal femoral fractures in frail institutionalized patients:The FRAIL-HIP Study

Importance Decision-making on management of proximal femoral fractures in frail patients with limited life expectancy is challenging, but surgical overtreatment needs to be prevented. Current literature provides limited insight into the true outcomes of nonoperative management and operative management in this patient population. Objective To investigate the outcomes of nonoperative management vs operative management of proximal femoral fractures in institutionalized frail older patients with limited life expectancy. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter cohort study was conducted between September 1, 2018, and April 25, 2020, with a 6-month follow-up period at 25 hospitals across the Netherlands. Eligible patients were aged 70 years or older, frail, and institutionalized and sustained a femoral neck or pertrochanteric fracture. The term frail implied at least 1 of the following characteristics was present: malnutrition (body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared] <18.5) or cachexia, severe comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class of IV or V), or severe mobility issues (Functional Ambulation Category ≤2). Exposures Shared decision-making (SDM) followed by nonoperative or operative fracture management. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D) utility score by proxies and caregivers. Secondary outcome measures were QUALIDEM (a dementia-specific quality-of-life instrument for persons with dementia in residential settings) scores, pain level (assessed by the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors With Limited Ability to Communicate), adverse events (Clavien-Dindo classification), mortality, treatment satisfaction (numeric rating scale), and quality of dying (Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire). Results Of the 172 enrolled patients with proximal femoral fractures (median [25th and 75th percentile] age, 88 [85-92] years; 135 women [78%]), 88 opted for nonoperative management and 84 opted for operative management. The EQ-5D utility scores by proxies and caregivers in the nonoperative management group remained within the set 0.15 noninferiority limit of the operative management group (week 1: 0.17 [95% CI, 0.13-0.29] vs 0.26 [95% CI, 0.11-0.23]; week 2: 0.19 [95% CI, 0.10-0.27] vs 0.28 [95% CI, 0.22-0.35]; and week 4: 0.24 [95% CI, 0.15-0.33] vs 0.34 [95% CI, 0.28-0.41]). Adverse events were less frequent in the nonoperative management group vs the operative management group (67 vs 167). The 30-day mortality rate was 83% (n = 73) in the nonoperative management group and 25% (n = 21) in the operative management group, with 26 proxies and caregivers (51%) in the nonoperative management group rating the quality of dying as good-almost perfect. Treatment satisfaction was high in both groups, with a median numeric rating scale score of 8. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this study indicated that nonoperative management of proximal femoral fractures (selected through an SDM process) was a viable option for frail institutionalized patients with limited life expectancy, suggesting that surgery should not be a foregone conclusion for this patient population

Evaluation of Quality of Life After Nonoperative or Operative Management of Proximal Femoral Fractures in Frail Institutionalized Patients The FRAIL-HIP Study

IMPORTANCE Decision-making on management of proximal femoral fractures in frail patients with limited life expectancy is challenging, but surgical overtreatment needs to be prevented. Current literature provides limited insight into the true outcomes of nonoperative management and operative management in this patient population.OBJECTIVE To investigate the outcomes of nonoperative management vs operative management of proximal femoral fractures in institutionalized frail older patients with limited life expectancy.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multicenter cohort studywas conducted between September 1, 2018, and April 25, 2020, with a 6-month follow-up period at 25 hospitals across the Netherlands. Eligible patientswere aged 70 years or older, frail, and institutionalized and sustained a femoral neck or pertrochanteric fracture. The term frail implied at least 1 of the following characteristicswas present: malnutrition (body mass index [calculated asweight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared] <18.5) or cachexia, severe comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class of IV or V), or severe mobility issues (Functional Ambulation Category similar to 2).EXPOSURES Shared decision-making (SDM) followed by nonoperative or operative fracture management.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomewas the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D) utility score by proxies and caregivers. Secondary outcome measures were QUALIDEM (a dementia-specific quality-of-life instrument for persons with dementia in residential settings) scores, pain level (assessed by the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors With Limited Ability to Communicate), adverse events (Clavien-Dindo classification), mortality, treatment satisfaction (numeric rating scale), and quality of dying (Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire).RESULTS Of the 172 enrolled patients with proximal femoral fractures (median [25th and 75th percentile] age, 88 [85-92] years; 135women [78%]), 88 opted for nonoperative management and 84 opted for operative management. The EQ-5D utility scores by proxies and caregivers in the nonoperative management group remained within the set 0.15 noninferiority limit of the operative management group (week 1: 0.17 [95% CI, 0.13-0.29] vs 0.26 [95% CI, 0.11-0.23]; week 2: 0.19 [95% CI, 0.10-0.27] vs 0.28 [95% CI, 0.22-0.35]; and week 4: 0.24 [95% CI, 0.15-0.33] vs 0.34 [95% CI, 0.28-0.41]). Adverse eventswere less frequent in the nonoperative management group vs the operative management group (67 vs 167). The 30-day mortality rate was 83%(n = 73) in the nonoperative management group and 25%(n = 21) in the operative management group, with 26 proxies and caregivers (51%) in the nonoperative management group rating the quality of dying as good-almost perfect. Treatment satisfaction was high in both groups, with a median numeric rating scale score of 8.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this study indicated that nonoperative management of proximal femoral fractures (selected through an SDM process) was a viable option for frail institutionalized patients with limited life expectancy, suggesting that surgery should not be a foregone conclusion for this patient population