333 research outputs found
Towards a sustainable future of the western shoreline of Lake Ziway: Particiatory land use plan development: Executive summary of workshop
PDB51 Resource Utilization in the Management of Acromegaly: An Analysis From Southwest Ontario
Creativity in Higher Education: Teaching Activities during Student Groups’ Idea Evaluation Process
Creativity should be cultivated in higher education to tackle the increasingly complex healthcare problems; however, despite this need for novelty, students collaborating in groups to solve a complex problem often seek consensus around low-novelty ideas. This study aims to explore the challenges higher education student groups face while evaluating and improving creative ideas, and to identify teaching activities that overcome these challenges. A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 14 teachers from the “innovation project” at Radboud university medical center in Netherlands. The results show that student groups face challenges in balancing thegoals of novelty and usefulness in their search for creative ideas, often selecting either novel ideas that are infeasible or ineffective, or useful ideas that already exist. Furthermore, teachers also identified problematic group dynamics as a challenge in the idea evaluation process. To overcome these challenges, teachers reported using cognitive, affective, metacognitive, and sociocommunicative teaching activities. In conclusion, higher education studentsmay not develop their most creative ideas even when creative solutions are required. This study highlights the importance of teaching higher education students to skilfully manage the twin goals of novelty and usefulness in theirsearch for creative solutions, while also dealing with group dynamics
Endurance run increases circulating IL-6 and IL-1ra but downregulates ex vivo TNF-a and IL-1Ăź production
Contains fulltext :
4818.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access
Creativity in Higher Education: Teaching Activities during Student Groups’ Idea Evaluation Process
Creativity should be cultivated in higher education to tackle the increasingly complex healthcare problems; however, despite this need for novelty, students collaborating in groups to solve a complex problem often seek consensus around low-novelty ideas. This study aims to explore the challenges higher education student groups face while evaluating and improving creative ideas, and to identify teaching activities that overcome these challenges. A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 14 teachers from the “innovation project” at Radboud university medical center in Netherlands. The results show that student groups face challenges in balancing thegoals of novelty and usefulness in their search for creative ideas, often selecting either novel ideas that are infeasible or ineffective, or useful ideas that already exist. Furthermore, teachers also identified problematic group dynamics as a challenge in the idea evaluation process. To overcome these challenges, teachers reported using cognitive, affective, metacognitive, and sociocommunicative teaching activities. In conclusion, higher education studentsmay not develop their most creative ideas even when creative solutions are required. This study highlights the importance of teaching higher education students to skilfully manage the twin goals of novelty and usefulness in theirsearch for creative solutions, while also dealing with group dynamics
The impact of management board diversity on corporate performance - An empirical analysis for the German two-tier system
Professionalising primary school teachers in guiding inquiry-based learning
This paper reports a pretest-posttest study about the impact of a teacher professional development (TPD) programme on primary school teachers’ knowledge of and attitude towards inquiry-based learning. A pedagogical framework of inquiry phases and domains of scientific knowledge combined with hard and soft scaffolds formed the basis for the TPD programme. A total of 59 teachers were divided between the experimental group, which participated in the TPD programme, and a control group. We measured the teachers’ subject matter knowledge (SMK) of the conceptual, epistemic, social, and procedural domain before and after the TPD programme by means of different questionnaires. In addition, we measured their knowledge of how to support their pupils during the inquiry process (PCK) and their attitude towards inquiry-based learning. The results show that our TPD programme improved teachers’ conceptual and social SMK, PCK, and attitude. Our study implicates that scaffolding different domains of scientific knowledge during the inquiry cycle is a valuable component of TPD in inquiry-based learning
High aldosterone, hypertension and adrenal adenoma in a 36-year-old pregnant patient: Is this primary aldosteronism?
A 36-year-old woman presented at 16 weeks’ gestation with severe hypertension. In comparison to the non-pregnant reference normal ranges, potassium was 3.1-3.9 mmol/L, aldosterone 2570-3000 pmol/L (N 250-2885) renin was unsuppressed (24-76.4 ng/L (N1.7–23.9)), with aldosterone to renin ratios in the reference range. An adrenal MRI scan demonstrated a 1.8 × 1.4 cm left adrenal adenoma. Primary aldosteronism was strongly suspected and surgery considered. However, she was managed conservatively with labetalol and modified-release nifedipine with no obstetric complications. Post-partum blood pressures remained elevated with normal aldosterone (539 pmol/L), unsuppressed renin (5.2 ng/L) and normal aldosterone-to-renin ratio (104 (N \u3c 144)). Suspected primary hyperaldosteronism is challenging to investigate and manage in pregnancy. The accepted screening and confirmatory tests are either contraindicated or not validated in pregnancy. Pregnancy has significant effects on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathway leading to physiologic elevations in both aldosterone and renin. While primary hyperaldosteronism has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes, optimal management in pregnancy is not clearly established
(Onder)wijs in techniek? : onderzoek naar de houding en praktijk van leraren ten aanzien van onderwijs in techniek
Al jaren wordt van alles gedaan om techniek een betere plaats in het basisonderwijs te geven. Kosten noch moeite zijn gespaard om leraren te enthousiasmeren en te scholen, om materialen te ontwikkelen en om scholen te ondersteunen bij het vormgeven van onderwijs in techniek. Maar hoe staat het er eigenlijk voor? Hoe denkt de gemiddelde leraar over onderwijs in techniek? Is hij of zij het belangrijker gaan vinden, gemakkelijker, en leuker? En wat kunnen 'externe' aanbieders doen om leraren in hun behoeften te ondersteunen? Op aanvraag van Vonk, vereniging voor techniek in het primair onderwijs en Techniektalent.nu is in het kader van het Kortlopend Onderwijsonderzoek getracht op deze vragen een antwoord te geven. Door middel van interviews en een uitgebreide online vragenlijst zijn de meningen van directeuren en leraren in het hele land verzameld. Aan bod komen meningen over het belang van onderwijs in techniek, over het aandeel techniek in het huidige onderwijs, over competenties van leraren ten aanzien van onderwijs in techniek en over de meerwaarde van activiteiten en materialen die door derden worden aangeboden aan het basisonderwijs. Ook is gekeken aan welke voorwaarden voor het implementeren van techniek directeuren en leraren vinden dat op hun school wordt voldaan. De bevindingen en daaruit afgeleide aanbevelingen staan in dit boekje beschreven, kort en bondig voor de lezer die overzicht wil krijgen, en met de mogelijkheid om dieper te graven voor wie echt wil weten hoe het zit
Impact of acute otitis media clinical practice guidelines on antibiotic and analgesic prescriptions: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines focusing on judicious use of antibiotics for childhood acute otitis media (AOM) have been introduced in many countries around the world. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effects of these guidelines on the prescription of antibiotics and analgesics for children with AOM. METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception to 6 June 2017 using broad search terms. Studies specifically aimed at evaluating the effects of introduction of national AOM practice guidelines on type of antibiotic and/or analgesic prescriptions were included, irrespective of design, setting or language. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: Of 411 unique records retrieved, seven studies conducted in six different countries (France, Italy, Spain, Sweden, UK and USA (twice)) compared data before and after guideline introduction. All studies had an observational design, using longitudinal data of children aged under 15 years (n=200-4.6 million) from either routine care, insurance databases or electronic surveys. Risk of bias of all studies was judged serious to critical.Of the five studies reporting on antibiotic prescription rates, three showed a decline of 5%-12% up to 3 years after guideline introduction and two found no or negligible effect. In one US study, the initial 9% decline decreased to 5% after 4-6 years. The recommended first choice antibiotic was prescribed more frequently (9%-58% increase) after guideline introduction in four out of five studies reporting on this outcome. Analgesic prescription rates for AOM were reported in one US study and increased from 14% to 24% after guideline introduction. CONCLUSION: Based upon what is published, the effects of introduction of national clinical practice guidelines on antibiotic and analgesic prescribing for children with AOM seem modest at the most. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42016050976
- …