Selective MMP Inhibition, Using AZD3342, to Reduce Gastrointestinal Toxicity and Enhance Chemoefficacy in a Rat Model

BACKGROUND: The common cytotoxic mechanisms that underpin chemoefficacy and toxicity have hampered efforts to deliver effective supportive care interventions, particularly for gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have been implicated in both tumor growth and GI toxicity, and as such MMP inhibitors present as a novel therapeutic avenue to simultaneously enhance treatment efficacy and reduce toxicity. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of an MMP-9/12 inhibitor, AZD3342, on tumor growth and GI toxicity in a rat model. METHODS: Female tumor-bearing Dark Agouti rats (n = 90) were divided into 4 groups: vehicle control; methotrexate (MTX); AZD3342, and MTX + AZD3342. Tumors were measured daily (for 5 days) using digital calipers. GI toxicity was assessed using well-established clinical markers (diarrhea/weight loss), histopathological analysis, and functional assessment of intestinal barrier permeability. RESULTS: AZD3342 delayed the onset of severe diarrhea by 1 day (vs. MTX) but was unable to improve the overall severity of diarrhea. No changes were detected in tissue morphology or intestinal barrier function. AZD3342 alone suppressed tumor growth (p = 0.003 vs. vehicle) but did not enhance the efficacy of MTX. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed partial efficacy of AZD3342 in reducing tumor growth and delaying the onset of severe diarrhea caused by MTX in rats. We suggest further studies be undertaken targeting appropriate scheduling of AZD3342 as well as investigating different cytotoxic therapies that strongly activate MMP signaling

Systematic review of agents for the management of cancer treatment-related gastrointestinal mucositis and clinical practice guidelines

20Purpose: The aim of this study was to update the clinical practice guidelines for the use of agents for the prevention and/or treatment of gastrointestinal mucositis (GIM). Methods: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: Recommendation, Suggestion, and No Guideline Possible. Results: A total of 78 papers across 13 interventions were examined of which 25 were included in the final review. No new guidelines were possible for any agent due to inadequate and/or conflicting evidence. Existing guidelines for probiotics and hyperbaric oxygen were unchanged. Conclusions: Of the agents studied for the prevention and treatment of GIM, the evidence continues to support use of probiotics containing Lactobacillus spp. for prevention of chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with pelvic malignancy, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy to treat radiation-induced proctitis. Additional well-designed research is encouraged to enable a decision regarding palifermin, glutamine, sodium butyrate, and dietary interventions, for the prevention or treatment of GIM.nonenoneBowen J.M.; Gibson R.J.; Coller J.K.; Blijlevens N.; Bossi P.; Al-Dasooqi N.; Bateman E.H.; Chiang K.; de Mooij C.; Mayo B.; Stringer A.M.; Tissing W.; Wardill H.R.; van Sebille Y.Z.A.; Ranna V.; Vaddi A.; Keefe D.M.; Lalla R.V.; Cheng K.K.F.; Elad S.Bowen, J. M.; Gibson, R. J.; Coller, J. K.; Blijlevens, N.; Bossi, P.; Al-Dasooqi, N.; Bateman, E. H.; Chiang, K.; de Mooij, C.; Mayo, B.; Stringer, A. M.; Tissing, W.; Wardill, H. R.; van Sebille, Y. Z. A.; Ranna, V.; Vaddi, A.; Keefe, D. M.; Lalla, R. V.; Cheng, K. K. F.; Elad, S

MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy

Background: Mucositis is a significant toxicity of cancer therapy with numerous systemic sequelae. The goal of this systematic review was to update the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of mucositis. Methods: The literature was reviewed systematically to identify interventions for mucositis. Studies were rated according to the presence of major and minor flaws according to previously published criteria. The body of evidence for each intervention and in each treatment setting was assigned a level of evidence based on previously published criteria. Guidelines were developed based on the level of evidence, with 3 possible guideline determinations: recommendation, suggestion, or no guideline possible. Results: The guideline covers evidence from 1197 publications related to oral or gastrointestinal mucositis. Thirteen new guidelines were developed for or against the use of various interventions in specific treatment settings, and 11 previous guidelines were confirmed after aa review of new evidence. Thirteen previously established guidelines were carried over because there was no new evidence for these interventions. Conclusions: The updated MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Guidelines for mucositis provide professional health caregivers with a clinical setting-specific, evidence-based tool to help with the management of mucositis in patients who have cancer