15 research outputs found

    Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii antibodies and chronic Q fever among post-mortal and living donors of tissues and cells from 2010 to 2015 in the Netherlands

    No full text
    Background: After a large Q fever outbreak in the Netherlands in the period from 2007 to 2010, the risk of Q fever transmission through tissue and cell transplantation from undiagnosed chronic Q fever cases became a potential issue. Aim: We aimed to evaluate the risk of Q fever transmission through tissue and cell transplantation. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study among 15,133 Dutch donors of tissues and stem cells from 2010 to 2015 to assess seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii antibodies, to identify factors associated with presence of C. burnetii antibodies, and to assess the proportion of undiagnosed chronic Q fever cases. Results: The study population consisted of 9,478 (63%) femoral head donors, 5,090 (34%) post-mortal tissue donors and 565 (4%) cord blood donors. Seroprevalence of C. burnetii antibodies gradually decreased after the outbreak, from 2.1% in 2010 to 1.4% in 2015, with a significant trend in time (p < 0.001). Of 301 seropositive donors, seven (2.3%) were newly detected with chronic Q fever (0.05% of all screened donors). Conclusion: This study shows that seroprevalence of C. burnetii antibodies among donors of tissues and cells in the Netherlands after 2014 was similar to pre-outbreak levels in the general population. The proportion of newly detected chronic Q fever patients among donors of tissues and cells was smaller than 0.1%. This study may prompt discussion on when to terminate the screening programme for chronic Q fever in donors of tissues and cells in the Netherlands

    Coxiella burnetii in non-Hodgkin lymphoma tissue samples : Innocent until proven otherwise?

    No full text
    Purpose: Coxiella burnetii has been suggested as a potential cause of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), as C. burnetii was detected in B-NHL tissues. To further investigate this potential relationship, we hypothesized that among subjects previously exposed to C. burnetii, the bacterium is more frequently detectable in tissues of patients with B-NHL (cases) compared to patients without B-NHL (controls). Methods: We aimed to evaluate this hypothesis by assessing the presence of C. burnetii with polymerase chain reaction (PCR), immunofluorescence staining (IF) and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH). Eligible patients were those previously exposed to C. burnetii. Results: Samples were available for 13 cases and 16 controls. C. burnetii was demonstrated in tissues of 8/29 patients in total (28%), with either PCR, IF or FISH: in 5/13 cases (38%) and 3/16 controls (19%), p = 0.41. Negative and positive control samples were all negative and positive appropriately for all three diagnostic methods. Conclusions: In patients previously exposed to C. burnetii the bacterium was detected in tissue samples from subjects with and without B-NHL, without significant differences in the proportion positive samples. Therefore, we conclude that detection of C. burnetii in tissues of patients previously exposed to C. burnetii is a non-specific finding

    Treatment of chronic Q fever : Clinical efficacy and toxicity of antibiotic regimens

    No full text
    Background. Evidence on the effectiveness of first-line treatment for chronic Q fever, tetracyclines (TET) plus hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and potential alternatives is scarce. Methods. We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study to assess efficacy of treatment with TET plus quinolones (QNL), TET plus QNL plus HCQ, QNL monotherapy, or TET monotherapy compared to TET plus HCQ in chronic Q fever patients. We used a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model to assess our primary (all-cause mortality) and secondary outcomes (first disease-related event and therapy failure). Results. We assessed 322 chronic Q fever patients; 276 (86%) received antibiotics. Compared to TET plus HCQ (n = 254; 92%), treatment with TET plus QNL (n = 49; 17%), TET plus QNL plus HCQ (n = 29, 10%), QNL monotherapy (n = 93; 34%), or TET monotherapy (n = 54; 20%) were not associated with primary or secondary outcomes. QNL and TET monotherapies were frequently discontinued due to insufficient clinical response (n = 27, 29% and n = 32, 59%). TET plus HCQ, TET plus QNL, and TET plus QNL plus HCQ were most frequently discontinued due to side effects (n = 110, 43%; n = 13, 27%; and n = 12, 41%). Conclusions. Treatment of chronic Q fever with TET plus QNL appears to be a safe alternative for TET plus HCQ, for example, if TET plus HCQ cannot be tolerated due to side effects. Treatment with TET plus QNL plus HCQ was not superior to treatment with TET plus HCQ, although this may be caused by confounding by indication. Treatment with TET or QNL monotherapy should be avoided; switches due to subjective, insufficient clinical response were frequently observed
    corecore