Candidate Gene-Based Association Study of Antipsychotic-Induced Movement Disorders in Long-Stay Psychiatric Patients: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE: Four types of antipsychotic-induced movement disorders: tardive dyskinesia (TD), parkinsonism, akathisia and tardive dystonia, subtypes of TD (orofacial and limb truncal dyskinesia), subtypes of parkinsonism (rest tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia), as well as a principal-factor of the movement disorders and their subtypes, were examined for association with variation in 10 candidate genes (PPP1R1B, BDNF, DRD3, DRD2, HTR2A, HTR2C, COMT, MnSOD, CYP1A2, and RGS2). METHODS: Naturalistic study of 168 white long-stay patients with chronic mental illness requiring long-term antipsychotic treatment, examined by the same rater at least two times over a 4-year period, with a mean follow-up time of 1.1 years, with validated scales for TD, parkinsonism, akathisia, and tardive dystonia. The authors genotyped 31 SNPs, associated with movement disorders or schizophrenia in previous studies. Genotype and allele frequency comparisons were performed with multiple regression methods for continuous movement disorders. RESULTS: VARIOUS SNPS REACHED NOMINAL SIGNIFICANCE: TD and orofacial dyskinesia with rs6265 and rs988748, limb truncal dyskinesia with rs6314, rest tremor with rs6275, rigidity with rs6265 and rs4680, bradykinesia with rs4795390, akathisia with rs4680, tardive dystonia with rs1799732, rs4880 and rs1152746. After controlling for multiple testing, no significant results remained. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that selected SNPs are not associated with a susceptibility to movement disorders. However, as the sample size was small and previous studies show inconsistent results, definite conclusions cannot be made. Replication is needed in larger study samples, preferably in longitudinal studies which take the fluctuating course of movement disorders and gene-environment interactions into account

Differences in time to patient access to innovative cancer medicines in six European countries

Patients across Europe face inequity regarding access to anticancer medicines. While access is typically evaluated through reimbursement status or sales data, patients can receive first access through early access programs (EAPs) or off-label use. This study aims to assess the time to patient access at the hospital level, considering different indications and countries. (Pre-)registered access to six innovative medicines (Olaparib, Niraparib, Ipilimumab, Osimeritinib, Nivolumab and Ibritunib) was measured using a cross-sectional survey. First patient access to medicines and indications were collected using the hospital databases. Nineteen hospitals from Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland and France participated. Analysis showed that some hospitals achieved patient access before national reimbursement, primarily through EAPs. The average time from EMA-approval to patient access for these medicines was 2.1 years (Range: −0.9-7.1 years). Hospitals in Italy and France had faster access compared to Hungary and Belgium. Variation was also found within countries, with specialized hospitals (x̄: −0.9 years; SD: 2.0) more likely to provide patient access prior to national reimbursement than general hospitals (x̄: 0.4 years; SD: 2.9). Contextual differences were observed, with EAPs or off-label use being more prevalent in Switzerland than Hungary. Recent EMA-approved indications and drug combinations reached patients at a later stage. Substantial variation in patient access time was observed between and within countries. Improving pricing and reimbursement timelines, fostering collaboration between national health authorities and market authorization holders, and implementing nationally harmonized, data-generating EAPs can enhance timely and equitable patient access to innovative cancer treatments in Europe.</p

Less Medication Use in Inpatients With Severe Mental Illness Receiving a Multidisciplinary Lifestyle Enhancing Treatment. The MULTI Study III

Besides having an unhealthy lifestyle contributing to premature mortality, inpatients with severe mental illness (SMI) use high dosages of medication. Previous research has shown improved health after lifestyle improvements in SMI. In addition, we aimed to retrospectively study whether a multidisciplinary lifestyle enhancing treatment (MULTI) was associated with changes in medication use after 18 months, as compared with patients that continued treatment as usual (TAU) and explored mediation by a change in physical activity. We conducted an observational study within a cohort of inpatients with SMI, who received MULTI (N = 65) or continued TAU (N = 49). Data on their somatic and psychotropic medications were collected, converted into defined daily dose (DDD), and analyzed using linear multilevel regression, correcting for baseline value and differences between groups in age, diagnosis, and illness severity. Compared with TAU, the DDD for psychotropic medication significantly decreased with MULTI (B = −0.55, P = 0.02). Changes in total activity did not mediate this association, suggesting that multiple components of MULTI contributed. Corrected between-group analyses for subgroups of medication were not possible due to lack of power and skewed distributions. Within-group data showed a decreased proportion of users as well as median DDD in both groups for almost all medications. In addition to previously reported health improvements after 18 months of MULTI, we observed a significant decrease in dose of psychotropic medication in MULTI compared to TAU. This first study evaluating a wide range of medications indicates a possible effect of lifestyle improvements on medication use in inpatients with SMI. Findings need to be confirmed in future controlled studies, however

Risk Factors for Tremor in a Population of Patients with Severe Mental Illness:An 18-year Prospective Study in a Geographically Representative Sample (The Curacao Extrapyramidal Syndromes Study XI)

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess incidence, prevalence and risk factors of medication-induced tremor in African-Caribbean patients with severe mental illness (SMI).METHOD: A prospective study of SMI patients receiving care from the only mental health service of the previous Dutch Antilles. Eight clinical assessments, over 18 years, focused on movement disorders, medication use, and resting tremor (RT) and (postural) action tremor (AT). Risk factors were modeled with logistic regression for both current (having) tremor and for tremor at the next time point (developing). The latter used a time-lagged design to assess medication changes prior to a change in tremor state.RESULTS: Yearly tremor incidence rate was 2.9% and mean tremor point prevalence was 18.4%. Over a third of patients displayed tremor during the study. Of the patients, 5.2% had AT with 25% of cases persisting to the next time point, while 17.1% of patients had RT of which 65.3% persisted. When tremor data were examined in individual patients, they often had periods of tremor interspersed with periods of no tremor. Having RT was associated with age (OR=1.07 per year; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.11), sex (OR=0.17 for males; 0.05-0.78), cocaine use (OR=10.53; 2.22-49.94), dyskinesia (OR=0.90; 0.83-0.97), and bradykinesia (OR=1.16; 1.09-1.22). Developing RT was strongly associated with previous measurement RT (OR=9.86; 3.80-25.63), with previous RT severity (OR=1.22; 1.05-1.41), and higher anticholinergic load (OR= 1.24; 1.08-1.43). Having AT was associated with tremor-inducing medication (OR= 4.54; 1.90-10.86), cocaine use (OR=14.04; 2.38-82.96), and bradykinesia (OR=1.07; 1.01-1.15). Developing AT was associated with, previous AT severity (OR=2.62 per unit; 1.64-4.18) and tremor reducing medication (OR=0.08; 0.01-0.55).CONCLUSIONS: Long-stay SMI patients are prone to developing tremors, which show a relapsing-remitting course. Differentiation between RT and AT is important as risk factors differ and they require different prevention and treatment strategies.</p

Thinking inside the box:improving the lifestyle of inpatients with severe mental illness

BACKGROUND: An unhealthy lifestyle plays an important role in the substantially reduced life-expectancy of inpatients with severe mental illness (SMI). However, there is a lack of evidence on the long-term effectiveness and implementation of lifestyle improvements in inpatient mental healthcare.&lt;br/&gt; AIM: Increasing knowledge and understanding of (the implementation of) lifestyle changes in inpatients with SMI in longer-term clinical care.&lt;br/&gt; METHOD: Cross-sectional research followed by an observational study to evaluate a multidisciplinary lifestyle enhancing treatment (MULTI) for both changes in health-related outcomes after 18 months compared to treatment as usual (TAU), and the implementation barriers and facilitators.&lt;br/&gt; RESULTS: Patients were very sedentary and less physically active compared to people without SMI. After 18 months, MULTI showed significant improvements in total physical activity, cardiometabolic risk factors, psychosocial functioning and mediation use, compared to TAU. Physical health did not improve in TAU. The implementation of MULTI was hampered by organisational factors and facilitated by positive attitudes of healthcare professionals and patients towards MULTI and their own role in it.&lt;br/&gt; CONCLUSION: Using a multidisciplinary integrated approach, it is possible to improve the lifestyle, and thus the health status, of SMI inpatients, within the current context of routine mental healthcare.</p

Thinking inside the box:improving the lifestyle of inpatients with severe mental illness

BACKGROUND: An unhealthy lifestyle plays an important role in the substantially reduced life-expectancy of inpatients with severe mental illness (SMI). However, there is a lack of evidence on the long-term effectiveness and implementation of lifestyle improvements in inpatient mental healthcare.&lt;br/&gt; AIM: Increasing knowledge and understanding of (the implementation of) lifestyle changes in inpatients with SMI in longer-term clinical care.&lt;br/&gt; METHOD: Cross-sectional research followed by an observational study to evaluate a multidisciplinary lifestyle enhancing treatment (MULTI) for both changes in health-related outcomes after 18 months compared to treatment as usual (TAU), and the implementation barriers and facilitators.&lt;br/&gt; RESULTS: Patients were very sedentary and less physically active compared to people without SMI. After 18 months, MULTI showed significant improvements in total physical activity, cardiometabolic risk factors, psychosocial functioning and mediation use, compared to TAU. Physical health did not improve in TAU. The implementation of MULTI was hampered by organisational factors and facilitated by positive attitudes of healthcare professionals and patients towards MULTI and their own role in it.&lt;br/&gt; CONCLUSION: Using a multidisciplinary integrated approach, it is possible to improve the lifestyle, and thus the health status, of SMI inpatients, within the current context of routine mental healthcare.</p