2 research outputs found

    Patient Safety Policy in Long-Term Care: A Research Protocol to Assess Executive WalkRounds to Improve Management of Early Warning Signs for Patient Safety

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: At many hospitals and long-term care organizations (such as nursing homes), executive board members have a responsibility to manage patient safety. Executive WalkRounds offer an opportunity for boards to build a trusting relationship with professionals and seem useful as a leadership tool to pick up on soft signals, which are indirect signals or early warnings that something is wrong. Because the majority of the research on WalkRounds has been performed in hospitals, it is unknown how board members of long-term care organizations develop their patient safety policy. Also, it is not clear if these board members use soft signals as a leadership tool and, if so, how this influences their patient safety policies. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to explore the added value and the feasibility of WalkRounds for patient safety management in long-term care. This study also aims to identify how executive board members of long-term care organizations manage patient safety and to describe the characteristics of boards. METHODS: An explorative before-and-after study was conducted between April 2012 and February 2014 in 13 long-term care organizations in the Netherlands. After implementing the intervention in 6 organizations, data from 72 WalkRounds were gathered by observation and a reporting form. Before and after the intervention period, data collection included interviews, questionnaires, and studying reports of the executive boards. A mixed-method analysis is performed using descriptive statistics, t tests, and content analysis. RESULTS: Results are expected to be ready in mid 2014. CONCLUSIONS: It is a challenge to keep track of ongoing development and implementation of patient safety management tools in long-term care. By performing this study in cooperation with the participating long-term care organizations, insight into the potential added value and the feasibility of this method will increase.status: publishe

    Feasibility and added value of executive WalkRounds in long term care organizations in the Netherlands

    No full text
    Background: Currently available tools for the management of safety in health care are largely based on quantitative management information. Executive WalkRounds (WalkRounds [WR]) seems useful as a leadership tool to detect "soft signals"—alerts of unsafe situations or practices— and to enhance the mutual trust between frontline staff and the board of directors. The majority of the research on WR has been performed in hospitals. Therefore, a study was conducted to assess how the boards of directors of long term care organizations value WR as a leadership tool to perceive soft signals, and whether soft signals are of added value to enhance patient safety.Methods: WRs were introduced in a convenience sample of six organizations—two mental health care institutions, two nursing homes and home care organizations, and two institutions for the physically and intellectually disabled— between July 2012 and December 2013. Data were gathered from observation and reporting forms. Feasibility was evaluated by open-group interviews. A mixed-method analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.Results: WRs were considered feasible, and the added value for the boards of directors consisted of an increased sense of urgency and safety awareness. The dialogue between the board of directors and frontline staff in each organization was essential for a collective patient safety culture. In total, WRs were used 68 times, and 298 soft signals were identified; most addressed care delivery and communication. Overall, 245 improvement activities were reported, of which 109 related to work environment.Conclusion: WRs were considered useful and feasible for detecting soft signals in long term care organizations. These signals are valuable for enhancing patient safety and can be used by the board of directors in addition to the current quality management systems
    corecore