12 research outputs found

    Risk factors for fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in adults with community-onset febrile urinary tract infection

    Get PDF
    Objectives To assess risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance in community-onset febrile Escherichia coli urinary tract infection (UTI). Methods A nested case-control study within a cohort of consecutive adults with febrile UTI presenting at primary healthcare centres or emergency departments during January 2004 through December 2009. Resistance was defined using EUCAST criteria (ciprofloxacin MIC >1.0 mg/L). Cases were subjects with fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli, and controls those with fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance. Results Of 787 consecutive patients, 420 had E. coli-positive urine cultures. Of these, 51 (12%) were fluoroquinolone resistant. Independent risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance were urinary catheter [odds ratio (OR) 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-11.6], recent hospitalization (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.0-4.3) and fluoroquinolone use in the past 6 months (OR 17.5; 95% CI 6.0-50.7). Environmental factors (e.g. contact with animals or hospitalized household members) were not associated with fluoroquinolone resistance. Of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains, 33% were resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanate and 65% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; 14% were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) positive compared with <1% of fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates. Conclusions Recent hospitalization, urinary catheter and fluoroquinolone use in the past 6 months were independent risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance in community-onset febrile E. coli UTI. Contact with animals or hospitalized household members was not associated with fluoroquinolone resistance. Fluoroquinolone resistance may be a marker of broader resistance, including ESBL positivity.Immunogenetics and cellular immunology of bacterial infectious disease

    Outpatient parenteral antifungal therapy (OPAT) for invasive fungal infections with intermittent dosing of liposomal amphotericin B

    Get PDF
    Triazole resistant A. fumigatus has been documented in many parts of the world. In the Netherlands, incidence is now above 10% and results in the need for long-term parenteral therapy with liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB). The long terminal half-life of LAmB suggests that intermittent dosing could be effective, making the application of outpatient antifungal therapy (OPAT) possible. Here, we report our experience with the use of OPAT for Invasive Fungal Infections (IFI). All adult patients treated with LAmB with a 2 or 3 times weekly administration via the outpatient departments in four academic tertiary care centers in the Netherlands and Belgium since January 2010 were included in our analysis. Patient characteristics were collected,\ud as well as information about diagnostics, therapy dose and duration, toxicity, treatment history and outcome of the IFI. In total, 18 patients were included. The most frequently used regimen (67%) was 5 mg/kg 3 times weekly. A partial response to the daily treatment prior to discharge was confirmed by CT-scan in 17 (94%) of patients. A favorable outcome was achieved in 13 (72%) patients. Decrease in renal function occurred in 10 (56%) cases but was reversible in all and was treatment limiting in one patient only. The 100-day mortality and 1-year mortality after initiation of OPAT were 0% and 6%, respectively. In a selected population, and after confirmation of initial response to treatment, our data support the use of OPAT with LAmB for treatment of IFI in an intermittent dosing regimen

    A case of rickettsialpox in Northern Europe

    No full text
    Immunogenetics and cellular immunology of bacterial infectious disease

    Prospective cohort study of acute pyelonephritis in adults: Safety of triage towards home based oral antimicrobial treatment

    No full text
    Objective: Home-based treatment of acute pyelonephritis (AP) is generally reserved for young non-pregnant women who lack co-morbidity. This study, focusing on the elderly and patients with co-morbidity, evaluates the Dutch primary care guideline that recommends referral to hospital only in case of suspected deterioration to severe sepsis or failure of antibiotic treatment, irrespective of patient's age, sex or co-morbidity. Methods: A prospective observational cohort study including consecutive non-pregnant adults with AP. Clinical and microbiological outcome measures of non-referred patients from 35 primary health care centres (PHC) were compared to patients referred to two affiliating emergency departments (EDs). Results: Of 395 evaluable patients, 153 were treated by PHCs and 242 referred to EDs. The median age was 63 years [IQR 43-77], 34% were male, 58% had co-morbidity; all comparable between the PHC and ED group. Referred ED patients were more likely to have signs of sepsis and to have been pre-treated with antibiotics. Bacteraemia was present in 10% of patients in the PHC group and 27% in the ED group (RR 2.83; 95% CI: 1.64-4.86, p < 0.001). Eight (5%) PHC patients were admitted during outpatient treatment but otherwise no major complications occurred. Clinical failure rates at 30 days were similar between PHC patients and ED patients; 9% and 10% respectively. Mortality rates of PHC patients versus ED patients were 1% versus 5% at 30 days (p = 0.058) and 1% versus 7% at 90 days (p = 0.007). Complicated outcome occurred in 6% of the PHC patients versus 12% in the patients referred to ED (p = 0.067). Conclusion: In a health care system with a well-organized primary care system and clear guideline, the outcome of adults with acute pyelonephritis, including men, the elderly and patients with co-morbidity, selected for oral antibiotic treatment at home did not lead to major complications. (C) 2009 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Medical Microbiolog

    Prospective cohort study of acute pyelonephritis in adults: Safety of triage towards home based oral antimicrobial treatment

    No full text
    Objective: Home-based treatment of acute pyelonephritis (AP) is generally reserved for young non-pregnant women who lack co-morbidity. This study, focusing on the elderly and patients with co-morbidity, evaluates the Dutch primary care guideline that recommends referral to hospital only in case of suspected deterioration to severe sepsis or failure of antibiotic treatment, irrespective of patient's age, sex or co-morbidity. Methods: A prospective observational cohort study including consecutive non-pregnant adults with AP. Clinical and microbiological outcome measures of non-referred patients from 35 primary health care centres (PHC) were compared to patients referred to two affiliating emergency departments (EDs). Results: Of 395 evaluable patients, 153 were treated by PHCs and 242 referred to EDs. The median age was 63 years [IQR 43-77], 34% were male, 58% had co-morbidity; all comparable between the PHC and ED group. Referred ED patients were more likely to have signs of sepsis and to have been pre-treated with antibiotics. Bacteraemia was present in 10% of patients in the PHC group and 27% in the ED group (RR 2.83; 95% CI: 1.64-4.86, p < 0.001). Eight (5%) PHC patients were admitted during outpatient treatment but otherwise no major complications occurred. Clinical failure rates at 30 days were similar between PHC patients and ED patients; 9% and 10% respectively. Mortality rates of PHC patients versus ED patients were 1% versus 5% at 30 days (p = 0.058) and 1% versus 7% at 90 days (p = 0.007). Complicated outcome occurred in 6% of the PHC patients versus 12% in the patients referred to ED (p = 0.067). Conclusion: In a health care system with a well-organized primary care system and clear guideline, the outcome of adults with acute pyelonephritis, including men, the elderly and patients with co-morbidity, selected for oral antibiotic treatment at home did not lead to major complications. (C) 2009 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

    Predicting the Need for Radiologic Imaging in Adults with Febrile Urinary Tract Infection

    No full text
    Background. Radiologic evaluation of adults with febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) is frequently performed to exclude urological disorders. This study aims to develop a clinical rule predicting need for radiologic imaging. Methods. We conducted a prospective, observational study including consecutive adults with febrile UTI at 8 emergency departments (EDs) in the Netherlands. Outcomes of ultrasounds and computed tomographs of the urinary tract were classified as "urgent urological disorder" (pyonephrosis or abscess), "nonurgent urologic disorder," "normal," and "incidental nonurological findings." Urgent and nonurgent urologic disorders were classified as " clinically relevant radiologic findings." The data of 5 EDs were used as the derivation cohort, and 3 EDs served as the validation cohort. Results. Three hundred forty-six patients were included in the derivation cohort. Radiologic imaging was performed for 245 patients (71%). A prediction rule was derived, being the presence of a history of urolithiasis, a urine pH >= 7.0, and/or renal insufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate, <= 40 mL/min/1.73 m(3)). This rule predicts clinically relevant radiologic findings with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 93% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 24% and urgent urological disorders with an NPV of 99% and a PPV of 10%. In the validation cohort (n = 131), the NPV and PPV for clinically relevant radiologic findings were 89% and 20%, respectively; for urgent urological disorders, the values were 100% and 11%, respectively. Potential reduction of radiologic imaging by implementing the prediction rule was 40%. Conclusions. Radiologic imaging can selectively be applied in adults with febrile UTI without loss of clinically relevant information by using a simple clinical prediction rule
    corecore