Perceived usefulness of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) increases after a short training:A randomized controlled trial in master of advanced nursing practice students

The Master program of Advanced Nursing Practice (MANP) educates nurses to become a nurse practitioner. Nurse practitioners are health care professionals focusing on the intersection of cure and care. However, a clear model covering that area is lacking. The use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) may be considered for incorporation in curricula due to its focus on the integration of cure and care. The purpose of this study is to test the effects of a short (= 4-h instructor-led) ICF training on perceived usefulness of the ICF. In a randomized controlled trial, 76 MANP students were randomly allocated to intervention or control group. Data were collected using an 'ICF survey and learning assessment tool'. Data of 56 students were included for analysis. Perceived usefulness of the ICF increased significantly in the intervention group immediately after training (p = 0.001) but no longer at 3-months follow-up (p = 0.388). Attitude and knowledge related to the ICF were significantly increased in the intervention group at both post-training assessments (p < 0.001 and 0.02). The positive influence of the ICF training on perceived usefulness of the ICF is relevant for including ICF in MANP curriculum

Does language ambiguity in clinical practice justify the introduction of standard terminology? An integrative review

Aims and objectives. To research the use of ambiguous language in written information concerning patients' functioning and to identify problems resulting from the use of ambiguous language in clinical practice. Background. Many projects that aimed to introduce standard terminology concerning patients' functioning in clinical practice are unsuccessful because standard terminology is rarely used in clinical practice. These projects mainly aim to improve communication by reducing ambiguous language. Considering their lack of success, the validity of the argument that language ambiguity is used in clinical practice is questioned. Design. An integrative literature review. Methods. A systematic search of the MEDLINE (1950-2012) and CINAHL (1982-2012) databases was undertaken, including empirical and theoretical literature. The selected studies were critically appraised using a data assessment and extraction form. Results. Seventeen of 767 papers were included in the review and synthesis. The use of ambiguous language in written information concerning patients' functioning was demonstrated. Problems resulting from the use of ambiguous language in clinical practice were not identified. However, several potential problems were suggested, including hindered clinical decision-making and limited research opportunities. Conclusion. The results of this review demonstrated the use of ambiguous language concerning patients' functioning, but health professionals in clinical practice did not experience this issue as a problem. This finding might explain why many projects aimed at introducing standard terminology concerning functioning in clinical practice to solve problems caused by ambiguous language are often unsuccessful. Language ambiguity alone is not a valid argument to justify the introduction of standard terminology. Relevance to clinical practice. The introduction of standard terminology concerning patients' functioning will only be successful when clinical practice requires the aggregation and reuse of data from electronic patient records for different purposes, including multidisciplinary decision-making and research

An Ontology driven collaborative development for biomedical terminologies:from the French CCAM to the Australian ICHI coding system

The CCAM French coding system of clinical procedures was developed between 1994 and 2004 using, in parallel, a traditional domain expert's consensus method on one hand, and advanced methodologies of ontology driven semantic representation and multilingual generation on the other hand. These advanced methodologies were applied under the framework of an European Union collaborative research project named GALEN and produced a new generation of biomedical terminology. Following the interest in several countries and in WHO, the GALEN network has tested the application of the ontology driven tools to the existing reduced Australian ICHI coding system for interventions presently under investigation by WHO to check its ability and appropriateness to become the reference international coding system for procedures. The initial results are presented and discussed in terms of feasibility and quality assurance for sharing and maintaining consistent medical knowledge and allowing diversity in linguistic expressiveness of end users