A comprehensive overview of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology

The concept of radioguided surgery, which was first developed some 60 years ago, involves the use of a radiation detection probe system for the intraoperative detection of radionuclides. The use of gamma detection probe technology in radioguided surgery has tremendously expanded and has evolved into what is now considered an established discipline within the practice of surgery, revolutionizing the surgical management of many malignancies, including breast cancer, melanoma, and colorectal cancer, as well as the surgical management of parathyroid disease. The impact of radioguided surgery on the surgical management of cancer patients includes providing vital and real-time information to the surgeon regarding the location and extent of disease, as well as regarding the assessment of surgical resection margins. Additionally, it has allowed the surgeon to minimize the surgical invasiveness of many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, while still maintaining maximum benefit to the cancer patient. In the current review, we have attempted to comprehensively evaluate the history, technical aspects, and clinical applications of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology

Postcardiac injury syndrome complicating radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular node

International audienceRadiofrequency ablation, which is increasingly used in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia, can be complicated with pericardial effusion and one case of Dressler's syndrome has already been reported after an atrioventricular pathway ablation. This case reports a second case complicating an atrioventricular node radiofrequency ablation procedure

Three-dimensional personalized monte carlo dosimetry in 90y resin microspheres therapy of hepatic metastases Nontumoral liver and lungs radiation protection considerations and treatment planning optimization

International audienceIn the last decades, selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has become a real alternative in the treatment of unresectable hepatic cancers. In practice, the activity prescription is limited by the irradiation of organs at risk (OAR), such as the lungs and nontumoral liver (NTL). Its clinical implementation is therefore highly dependent on dosimetry. In that context, a 3-dimensional personalized dosimetry technique-personalized Monte Carlo dosimetry (PMCD)- based on patient-specific data and Monte Carlo calculations was developed and evaluated retrospectively on clinical data. Methods The PMCD method was evaluated with data from technetium human albumin macroaggregates (99mTc-MAA) evaluations of 10 patients treated for hepatic metastases. Region-of-interest outlines were drawn on CT images to create patient-specific voxel phantoms using the OEDIPE software. Normalized 3-dimensional matrices of cumulated activity were generated from 99mTc-SPECT data. Absorbed doses at the voxel scale were then obtained with the MCNPX Monte Carlo code. The maximum-injectable activity (MIA) for tolerance criteria based on either OAR mean absorbed doses (D mean) or OAR dose-volume histograms (DVHs) was determined using OEDIPE. Those MIAs were compared with the one recommended by the partition model (PM) with Dmean tolerance criteria. Finally, OEDIPE was used to evaluate the absorbed doses delivered if those activities were injected to the patient and to generate the corresponding isodose curves and DVHs. Results The MIA recommended using Dmean tolerance criteria is, in average, 27% higher with the PMCD method than with the PM. If tolerance criteria based on DVHs are used along with the PMCD, an increase of at least 40% of the MIA is conceivable, compared with the PM. For MIAs calculated with the PMCD, D mean delivered to tumoral liver (TL) ranged from 19.5 to 118 Gy for Dmean tolerance criteria whereas they ranged from 26.6 to 918 Gy with DVH tolerance criteria. Thus, using the PMCD method, which accounts for fixation heterogeneities, higher doses can be delivered to TL. Finally, absorbed doses to the lungs are not the limiting criterion for activity prescription. However, Dmean to the lungs can reach 15.0 Gy. Conclusion Besides its feasibility and applicability in clinical routine, the interest for treatment optimization of a personalized Monte Carlo dosimetry in the context of SIRT was confirmed in this study. © 2014 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc

Fractionation protocol design for treatment planning optimization in SIRT using the OEDIPE software

To go further in the optimization of treatment planning in selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), radiobiological aspects can be accounted for with the OEDIPE software and used to design fractionation protocols. Dosimetry was performed using data from 99mTc-MAA evaluations of 10 patients treated for hepatic metastases with SIRT. The maximal injectable activity (MIA) was calculated, using a tolerance criterion on BEDmean,healthyliver equal to 54 Gy2.5, for different fractionation protocols, varying the number of fractions, the repartition of activity and the time delay between fractions. OEDIPE was also used to calculate BEDmean and the EUD to the tumoral liver (TL) that would be delivered with those MIAs. Compared with a single-injection protocol, the MIA is increased on average by 23% ± 3%, 36% ± 5% and 45% ± 7% for fractionation protocols with 2, 3 and 4 equal fractions, respectively, while BEDmean,TL is increased by 15% ± 2%, 23% ± 4% and 29% ± 5%. EUDTL, calculated for one evaluation, is increased by 51%, 115% and 159% using 2, 3 and 4 equal fractions, respectively. For this evaluation, the optimal activity repartition for two-fraction protocols is (3/4 − 1/4) for time delays of less than 4 days, (2/3 − 1/3) for time delays between 4 and 6 days and (1/2 − 1/2) for time delays superior to 6 days. Finally, this study confirmed that OEDIPE can be regarded as a tool for treatment planning optimization and fractionation protocol design in SIRT

OEDIPE, a software for personalized Monte Carlo dosimetry and treatment planning optimization in nuclear medicine Absorbed dose and biologically effective dose considerations

International audienceFor targeted radionuclide therapies, treatment planning usually consists of the administration of standard activities without accounting for the patient-specific activity distribution, pharmacokinetics and dosimetry to organs at risk. The OEDIPE software is a user-friendly interface which has an automation level suitable for performing personalized Monte Carlo 3D dosimetry for diagnostic and therapeutic radionuclide administrations. Mean absorbed doses to regions of interest (ROIs), isodose curves superimposed on a personalized anatomical model of the patient and dose-volume histograms can be extracted from the absorbed dose 3D distribution. Moreover, to account for the differences in radiosensitivity between tumoral and healthy tissues, additional functionalities have been implemented to calculate the 3D distribution of the biologically effective dose (BED), mean BEDs to ROIs, isoBED curves and BED-volume histograms along with the Equivalent Uniform Biologically Effective Dose (EUD) to ROIs. Finally, optimization tools are available for treatment planning optimization using either the absorbed dose or BED distributions. These tools enable one to calculate the maximal injectable activity which meets tolerance criteria to organs at risk for a chosen fractionation protocol. This paper describes the functionalities available in the latest version of the OEDIPE software to perform personalized Monte Carlo dosimetry and treatment planning optimization in targeted radionuclide therapies. © 2014 EDP Sciences

Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary interventions in contemporary practice

Intravascular ultrasound imaging has been pivotal in the understanding of coronary artery disease and the development of percutaneous coronary intervention. The ability to analyse vessel walls and measure atherosclerotic lesions more accurately has enabled the field of invasive cardiology to overcome the limits of angiography. In fact, intravascular ultrasound measurements correlate with functional measurement of coronary blood flow, as a result interest in their use for the diagnosis of lesion severity in ambiguous lesions and for left main trunk analysis has grown. On the interventional side, intravascular ultrasound is used to determine the major predictors of restenosis and stent thrombosis, which are the main pitfalls of percutaneous coronary intervention. In the bare-metal stent era, intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with a reduction in restenosis rates because it enabled identification and treatment of the risk factors for complications. Although drug-eluting stents have provided a great technological advance in percutaneous coronary intervention, further reducing the rate of in-stent restenosis, they have not abolished restenosis completely; intravascular ultrasound has also been used in this setting to identify the mechanisms responsible for drug-eluting stent restenosis. As in the bare-metal stent era, identification of the predictors of restenosis and stent thrombosis and their subsequent treatment may offer the promise of improved outcome in the drug-eluting stent era. This review focuses on the potential benefit of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with regard to restenosis and stent thrombosis in the bare-metal stent and drug-eluting stent eras.9 page(s