ELISA versus PCR for diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Most current guidelines recommend two serological tests to diagnose chronic Chagas disease. When serological tests are persistently inconclusive, some guidelines recommend molecular tests. The aim of this investigation was to review chronic Chagas disease diagnosis literature and to summarize results of ELISA and PCR performance.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A systematic review was conducted searching remote databases (MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, SCOPUS and ISIWeb) and full texts bibliography for relevant abstracts. In addition, manufacturers of commercial tests were contacted. Original investigations were eligible if they estimated sensitivity and specificity, or reliability -or if their calculation was possible - of ELISA or PCR tests, for chronic Chagas disease.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Heterogeneity was high within each test (ELISA and PCR) and threshold effect was detected only in a particular subgroup. Reference standard blinding partially explained heterogeneity in ELISA studies, and pooled sensitivity and specificity were 97.7% [96.7%-98.5%] and 96.3% [94.6%-97.6%] respectively. Commercial ELISA with recombinant antigens studied in phase three investigations partially explained heterogeneity, and pooled sensitivity and specificity were 99.3% [97.9%-99.9%] and 97.5% [88.5%-99.5%] respectively. ELISA's reliability was seldom studied but was considered acceptable. PCR heterogeneity was not explained, but a threshold effect was detected in three groups created by using guanidine and boiling the sample before DNA extraction. PCR sensitivity is likely to be between 50% and 90%, while its specificity is close to 100%. PCR reliability was never studied.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Both conventional and recombinant based ELISA give useful information, however there are commercial tests without technical reports and therefore were not included in this review. Physicians need to have access to technical reports to understand if these serological tests are similar to those included in this review and therefore correctly order and interpret test results. Currently, PCR should not be used in clinical practice for chronic Chagas disease diagnosis and there is no PCR test commercially available for this purpose. Tests limitations and directions for future research are discussed.</p

Cystatin C is glucocorticoid-responsive, directs recruitment of Trem2+ macrophages and predicts failure of cancer immunotherapy

Cystatin C (CyC) is a secreted cysteine protease inhibitor and its biological functions remain insufficiently characterized. Plasma CyC is elevated in many patients, especially when receiving glucocorticoid (GC) treatment. Endogenous GCs are essential for life and are appropriately upregulated in response to systemic stress. Here we empirically connect GCs with systemic regulation of CyC. We used genome-wide association and structural equation modeling to determine the genetics of the latent trait CyC production in UK Biobank. CyC production and a polygenic score (PGS) capturing germline predisposition to CyC production predicted elevated all-cause and cancer-specific mortality. We then demonstrated that CyC is a direct target of GC receptor, with GC-responsive CyC secretion exhibited by macrophages and cancer cells. Using isogenic CyC-knockout tumors, we discovered a markedly attenuated tumor growth in vivo and found abrogated recruitment of Trem2+ macrophages, which have been previously linked to failure of cancer immunotherapy. Finally, we showed that the CyC-production PGS predicted checkpoint immunotherapy failure in a combined clinical trial cohort of 685 metastatic cancer patients. Taken together, our results demonstrate that CyC may be a direct effector of GC-induced immunosuppression, acting through recruitment of Trem2+ macrophages, and therefore could be a target for combination cancer immunotherapy