7 research outputs found

    Status of faecal pollution in ports: A basin-wide investigation in the Adriatic Sea

    Get PDF
    Ports are subject to a variety of anthropogenic impacts, and there is mounting evidence of faecal contamination through several routes. Yet, little is known about pollution in ports by faecal indicator bacteria (FIB). FIB spatio-temporal dynamics were assessed in 12 ports of the Adriatic Sea, a semi-enclosed basin under strong anthropogenic pressure, and their relationships with environmental variables were explored to gain insight into pollution sources. FIB were abundant in ports, often more so than in adjacent areas ; their abundance patterns were related to salinity, oxygen, and nutrient levels. In addition, a molecular method, quantitative (q)PCR, was used to quantify FIB. qPCR enabled faster FIB determination and water quality monitoring that culture-based methods. These data provide robust baseline evidence of faecal contamination in ports and can be used to improve the management of routine port activities (dredging and ballast water exchange), having potential to spread pathogens in the sea

    Gamma-Ray Burst observations by the high-energy charged particle detector on board the CSES-01 satellite between 2019 and 2021

    Full text link
    In this paper we report the detection of five strong Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) by the High-Energy Particle Detector (HEPD-01) mounted on board the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES-01), operational since 2018 on a Sun-synchronous polar orbit at a \sim 507 km altitude and 97^\circ inclination. HEPD-01 was designed to detect high-energy electrons in the energy range 3 - 100 MeV, protons in the range 30 - 300 MeV, and light nuclei in the range 30 - 300 MeV/n. Nonetheless, Monte Carlo simulations have shown HEPD-01 is sensitive to gamma-ray photons in the energy range 300 keV - 50 MeV, even if with a moderate effective area above \sim 5 MeV. A dedicated time correlation analysis between GRBs reported in literature and signals from a set of HEPD-01 trigger configuration masks has confirmed the anticipated detector sensitivity to high-energy photons. A comparison between the simultaneous time profiles of HEPD-01 electron fluxes and photons from GRB190114C, GRB190305A, GRB190928A, GRB200826B and GRB211211A has shown a remarkable similarity, in spite of the different energy ranges. The high-energy response, with peak sensitivity at about 2 MeV, and moderate effective area of the detector in the actual flight configuration explain why these five GRBs, characterised by a fluence above \sim 3 ×\times 105^{-5} erg cm2^{-2} in the energy interval 300 keV - 50 MeV, have been detected.Comment: Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal (ApJ

    Effectiveness of a multi-layer silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam dressing as prevention for sacral pressure ulcers in at-risk in-patients: Randomized controlled trial

    No full text
    Background: There is need for improvement in effective pressure ulcers preventive strategies. Objective: To study whether a multi-layer silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam dressing shaped for the sacrum prevents PUs development in addition to standard PU preventive care for at-risk hospitalized patients. Design: Open-label, parallel group, multi-center randomized controlled trial. Participants and setting: 709 in-hospital patients at risk for pressure ulcers from 25 medical, surgical, and intensive care units of 12 Italian hospitals. Methods: A multi-layer silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam was applied to the sacrum in addition to standard PUs preventive care in the intervention group. In the control group, standard preventive care alone, including systematic pressure ulcer risk assessment, skin assessment three times per day, routine positioning every 4 h, use of active support surface as appropriate, and incontinence skin care, was guaranteed. Primary outcome was incidence of sacral pressure ulcers of any stage at seven days from hospital admission. Secondary outcomes were incidence of sacral pressure ulcers ≥ II stage, number of days needed to PU development, number of skin adverse events due to the foam dressing, number of dressings used for each patient, number of withdrawing patients due to discomfort caused by the foam dressing. Participants were evaluated at baseline and at seven days. Results: In patients admitted to medical units, 15/113 controls and 4/118 in the intervention group developed sacral pressure ulcers (p = 0.010; absolute reduction 9.2%; NNT for benefit 11, 95% CI 6 to 44). In patients admitted to surgical units, 21/144 controls and 8/142 in the intervention group developed sacral pressure ulcers (p = 0.010; absolute reduction 8.9%; NNT for benefit 11 95% CI 6 to 49). Pressure ulcers incidence was not significantly different between the randomization arms (5.2% experimental vs 10.4% control, p = 0.141) in patients admitted to intensive care units. Overall, 46/358 (12.8%) controls and 17/351 (4.8%) in the intervention group developed sacral pressure ulcers (p<0.001; absolute reduction 8%; number needed to treat (NNT) for benefit 12, 95% CI 8 to 26). Incidence of sacral pressure ulcers ≥ II stage did not differ significantly between the two groups. No adverse skin reactions and discomfort attributable to the foam application were reported. Conclusion: A sacral multi-layer silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam in addition to standard preventive care is effective for pressure ulcers prevention in at-risk hospitalized patients admitted to medical and surgical units. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03900455. The registration (April 1st, 2019) occurred before the first patient was enrolled (October 21st, 2019)

    Evidence of an upper ionospheric electric field perturbation correlated with a gamma ray burst

    No full text
    Abstract Earth’s atmosphere, whose ionization stability plays a fundamental role for the evolution and endurance of life, is exposed to the effect of cosmic explosions producing high energy Gamma-ray-bursts. Being able to abruptly increase the atmospheric ionization, they might deplete stratospheric ozone on a global scale. During the last decades, an average of more than one Gamma-ray-burst per day were recorded. Nevertheless, measurable effects on the ionosphere were rarely observed, in any case on its bottom-side (from about 60 km up to about 350 km of altitude). Here, we report evidence of an intense top-side (about 500 km) ionospheric perturbation induced by significant sudden ionospheric disturbance, and a large variation of the ionospheric electric field at 500 km, which are both correlated with the October 9, 2022 Gamma-ray-burst (GRB221009A)
    corecore