Strengthening health data on a rare and heterogeneous disease: sarcoma incidence and histological subtypes in Germany

Background: The population-based incidence of sarcoma and its histological subtypes in Germany is unknown. Up-to-date information on a disease with an incidence comparable to other cancer entities is of high public health relevance. The aim of this study was to determine this incidence and to detect significant changes in incidence trends using data from German epidemiological cancer registries. Methods: Pooled data from the German Centre for Cancer Registry Data with a primary diagnosis occurring in 2013 were used. To date, this is the latest data on cancer incidence available for Germany. All German cancer registries with sufficient completeness were included (10 out of 11), covering a population of 70.0 million people, representing 87% of the German population. All malignant sarcomas according to the RARECARE Project and the WHO classification 2002 were considered for analysis and, above all, gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) of uncertain behaviour. Sensitivity analysis was performed excluding certain histologies. Results: The analysis included 3404 cases in men and 3442 cases in women diagnosed in 2013. The age adjusted sarcoma incidence (European standard) was 7.4 (men) and 6.6 (women) per 100,000 inhabitants. About 70% of sarcomas were soft tissue sarcomas, about 22% GIST, and about 9% bone sarcomas. The most common histological subtypes besides GIST were fibrosarcomas (14%) and liposarcomas (12%) in men and complex mixed and stromal neoplasms (22%), non-uterine leiomysarcomas (10%) and fibrosarcomas (9%) in women. Considering the trend for the years of diagnosis 2004 to 2013, there was a significant increase in incidence for GIST while the incidence of soft tissue sarcomas (only men) as well as of bone sarcoma stayed constant over time. As to soft tissue sarcoma in women, the incidence stayed constant up to the year 2009 and significantly decreased afterwards. Conclusion: This study is the first detailed analysis of a German-wide population-based sarcoma incidence showing results comparable to the incidence detected in the RARECARE Project

Epidemiologie des CUP-Syndroms in Deutschland

Der Artikel gibt einen Überblick über Inzidenz‑, Mortalitäts- und Überlebensraten des „cancer of unknown primary“ (CUP) in Deutschland, beruhend auf den Daten der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland sowie der amtlichen Todesursachsenstatistik. Danach erkrankten in Deutschland zuletzt jährlich rund 11.000 Personen an einem CUP, was einem Anteil von 2,3 % an allen Malignomen entspricht. Bei knapp 10.000 Menschen wird ein unbekannter oder nicht näher bezeichneter Primärtumor (ICD-10: C80) als Todesursache angegeben. Aktuelle internationale Vergleichsdaten deuten allerdings darauf hin, dass die Inzidenz für das echte CUP-Syndrom eher niedriger liegen dürfte, wahrscheinlich weil die Unterscheidung zwischen einem tatsächlich unbekannten und einem lediglich nicht näher bezeichneten Primärtumor v. a. bei den nur über Todesbescheinigungen identifizierten Fällen schwierig ist. Morphologisch überwiegt das Adenokarzinom; in etwa 30 % der Fälle sind nur unspezifische Histologien angegeben. Die Prognose des CUP entspricht mit relativen Fünfjahresüberlebensraten um 18 % etwa der des Lungenkarzinoms, wobei Patienten in jüngerem Alter und solche mit Plattenepithelkarzinomen deutlich höhere Überlebenschancen aufweisen

Data from Population-based Cancer Registration for Secondary Data Analysis: Methodological Challenges and Perspectives

Population-based cancer registries have a long-standing role in cancer monitoring. Scientific use of cancer registry data is one important purpose of cancer registration, but use of cancer registry data is not restricted to cancer registries. Cancer registration in Germany is currently heading towards population-based collection of detailed clinical data. This development together with additional options for record linkage and long-term follow-up will offer new opportunities for health services and outcome research. Both regional population-based registries and the German Centre for Cancer Registry Data (ZfKD) at the Robert Koch-Institute as well as international cancer registries and consortia or organizations may provide external researchers access to individual or aggregate level data for secondary data analysis. In this review, we elaborate on the access to cancer registry data for research purposes, availability of specific data items, and options for data linkage with external data sources. We also discuss as well as on limitations in data availability and quality, and describe typical biases in design and analysis.Peer Reviewe

Current Practice of Heart Donor Evaluation in Germany: Multivariable Risk Factor Analysis Confirms Practicability of Guidelines

Background. Organ shortage has liberalised the acceptance criteria of grafts for heart transplantation, but which donor characteristics ultimately influence the decision to perform transplantation? For the first time this was evaluated using real-time donor data from the German organ procurement organization (DSO). Observed associations are discussed with regard to international recommendations and guidelines. Methods. 5291 German donors (2006–2010) were formally eligible for heart donation. In logistic regression models 160 donor parameters were evaluated to assess their influence on using grafts for transplantation (random split of cases: 2/3 study sample, 1/3 validation sample). Results. Successful procurement was determined by low donor age (OR 0.87 per year; 95% CI [0.85–0.89], P<0.0001), large donor height (OR 1.04 per cm; 95% CI [1.02–1.06], P<0.0001), exclusion of impaired left ventricular function or wall motion (OR 0.01; 95% CI [0.002–0.036], P<0.0001), arrhythmia (OR 0.05; 95% CI [0.009–0.260], P=0.0004), and of severe coronary artery disease (OR 0.003; 95% CI [<0.001–0.01], P<0.0001). Donor characteristics differed between cases where the procedure was aborted without and with allocation initiated via Eurotransplant

Psychosocial Care Needs of Melanoma Survivors: Are They Being Met?

Patients who have survived malignant melanoma for more than five years may lack the opportunity to talk about their burden. As a consequence their psychosocial care needs remain undetected and available supportive interventions may not be utilised. Therefore, the psychosocial burden of this patient group needs to be assessed using specific screening instruments. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychosocial burden of long-term melanoma survivors, their psychosocial care needs and the determinants of these needs. We wanted to find out if the use of professional support corresponds to the care needs defined by experts. Using the cancer registry of Rhineland-Palatinate, melanoma patients diagnosed at least 5 years before the survey were contacted by physicians. N = 689 former patients completed the Hornheide Questionnaire (short form HQ-S) to identify psychosocial support need (scale cut off ≥ 16 or item-based cut-off score) and the potential psychosocial determinants of these needs. Additionally, they were asked about their utilisation of the professional support system. More than one third (36%) of them was in need for professional psychosocial support. The highest burden scores concerned worry about tumour progression. Younger age (< 50), higher general fatigue, higher symptom burden, lower general health, negative social interactions and unfulfilled information needs were significant predictors of the need for psychosocial intervention. Related to the percentage of survivors identified as 'in need', the professional support system was underused. Further studies should investigate whether using the HQ-S to routinely identify burdened melanoma patients could lead to better fulfilment of their intervention needs, ultimately enhancing health-related quality of life

Distress mediates the relationship between cognitive appraisal of medical care and benefit finding/posttraumatic growth in long-term cancer survivors

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to ascertain long-term cancer survivors' (LTCS') appraisal of medical care and how these perceptions may influence their health and well-being, including benefit finding (BF) and posttraumatic growth (PTG). METHODS: In total, 6952 LTCS from a multiregional population-based study in Germany completed the Benefit Finding Scale, the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, the Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer, and self-designed questions on cognitive appraisal of medical care. The authors explored the mediating role of distress between medical care appraisal and BF and PTG and the possible moderation of time since diagnosis in this relationship. RESULTS: LTCS' medical care appraisals (“no unresolved/untreated symptoms,” “satisfaction with cancer care,” and “satisfaction with care for other diseases”) were positively associated with BF. PTG was positively associated with “no unresolved/untreated symptoms” and negatively associated with “satisfaction with care for other diseases.” Cancer distress partially mediated the associations between appraisals of medical care and BF, between “no unresolved/untreated symptoms” and PTG and between “satisfaction with care for other diseases” and PTG; whereas it totally mediated the association between “satisfaction with cancer care” and PTG. Time was a significant moderator in the model; the negative indirect effect of cognitive appraisal on BF and PTG through cancer distress weakened with longer time since diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors' medical care appraisal is associated with their perceptions of BF and PTG through distress. Therefore, distress screening could be part of the regular workup to identify distressed cancer survivors who are not satisfied with medical care; these survivors may benefit from interventions to reduce distress and increase BF and PTG

Age‐specific prevalence and determinants of depression in long‐term breast cancer survivors compared to female population controls

BACKGROUND: Depression is more prevalent in breast cancer (BC) survivors than in the general population. However, little is known about depression in long‐term survivors. Study objectives were: (1) to compare the age‐specific prevalence of depressive symptoms (a) in BC survivors vs female population controls, (b) in disease‐free BC survivors vs BC survivors with self‐reported recurrence vs controls, and (2) to explore determinants of depression in BC survivors. METHODS: About 3010 BC survivors (stage I‐III, 5‐16 years post‐diagnosis), and 1005 population controls were recruited in German multi‐regional population‐based studies. Depression was assessed by the Geriatric Depression Scale‐15. Prevalence of mild/severe and severe depression only were estimated via logistic regression, controlling for age and education. Multinomial logistic regression was used to explore determinants of mild and severe depression. RESULTS: Compared with population controls, BC survivors were more likely to report mild/severe depression (30.4% vs 23.8%, p = .0003), adjusted for age and education. At all age groups &lt;80 years, prevalence of both mild/severe and severe depression only was significantly higher in BC survivors, while BC survivors ≥80 years reported severe depression less frequently than controls. BC survivors with recurrence reported significantly higher prevalence of mild/severe depression than disease‐free survivors and controls, but prevalence in disease‐free survivors and controls was comparable. Age, income, living independently, recurrence, and BMI were significant determinants of mild depression in BC survivors. Age, education, employment, income, recurrence, and BMI were significant determinants of severe depression. CONCLUSIONS: Long‐term BC survivors &lt;80 years report significantly higher prevalence of depressive symptoms than controls, which might be explained by recurrence and individual factors. The findings suggest that depression in BC survivors is common, and even more after BC recurrence. Clinicians should routinize screening and normalize referral to psychological care

Specifics of young gastric cancer patients: a population-based analysis of 46,110 patients with gastric cancer from the German Clinical Cancer Registry Group

Introduction: 2–8% of all gastric cancer occurs at a younger age, also known as early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC). The aim of the present work was to use clinical registry data to classify and characterize the young cohort of patients with gastric cancer more precisely. Methods: German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers—Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT)was queried for patients with gastric cancer from 2000–2016. An approach that stratified relative distributions of histological subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma according to age percentiles was used to define and characterize EOGC. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment and survival were analyzed. Results: A total of 46,110 patients were included. Comparison of different groups of age with incidences of histological subtypes showed that incidence of signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) increased with decreasing age and exceeded pooled incidences of diffuse and intestinal type tumors in the youngest 20% of patients. We selected this group with median age of 53 as EOGC. The proportion of female patients was lower in EOGC than that of elderly patients (43% versus 45%; p < 0.001). EOGC presented more advanced and undifferentiated tumors with G3/4 stages in 77% versus 62%, T3/4 stages in 51% versus 48%, nodal positive tumors in 57% versus 53% and metastasis in 35% versus 30% (p < 0.001) and received less curative treatment (42% versus 52%; p < 0.001). Survival of EOGC was significantly better (five-years survival: 44% versus 31% (p < 0.0001), with age as independent predictor of better survival (HR 0.61; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: With this population-based registry study we were able to objectively define a cohort of patients referred to as EOGC. Despite more aggressive/advanced tumors and less curative treatment, survival was significantly better compared to elderly patients, and age was identified as an independent predictor for better survival

Age‐specific prevalence and determinants of depression in long‐term breast cancer survivors compared to female population controls

BACKGROUND: Depression is more prevalent in breast cancer (BC) survivors than in the general population. However, little is known about depression in long‐term survivors. Study objectives were: (1) to compare the age‐specific prevalence of depressive symptoms (a) in BC survivors vs female population controls, (b) in disease‐free BC survivors vs BC survivors with self‐reported recurrence vs controls, and (2) to explore determinants of depression in BC survivors. METHODS: About 3010 BC survivors (stage I‐III, 5‐16 years post‐diagnosis), and 1005 population controls were recruited in German multi‐regional population‐based studies. Depression was assessed by the Geriatric Depression Scale‐15. Prevalence of mild/severe and severe depression only were estimated via logistic regression, controlling for age and education. Multinomial logistic regression was used to explore determinants of mild and severe depression. RESULTS: Compared with population controls, BC survivors were more likely to report mild/severe depression (30.4% vs 23.8%, p = .0003), adjusted for age and education. At all age groups &lt;80 years, prevalence of both mild/severe and severe depression only was significantly higher in BC survivors, while BC survivors ≥80 years reported severe depression less frequently than controls. BC survivors with recurrence reported significantly higher prevalence of mild/severe depression than disease‐free survivors and controls, but prevalence in disease‐free survivors and controls was comparable. Age, income, living independently, recurrence, and BMI were significant determinants of mild depression in BC survivors. Age, education, employment, income, recurrence, and BMI were significant determinants of severe depression. CONCLUSIONS: Long‐term BC survivors &lt;80 years report significantly higher prevalence of depressive symptoms than controls, which might be explained by recurrence and individual factors. The findings suggest that depression in BC survivors is common, and even more after BC recurrence. Clinicians should routinize screening and normalize referral to psychological care