846 research outputs found

    Differential cross section analysis in kaon photoproduction using associated legendre polynomials

    Full text link
    Angular distributions of differential cross sections from the latest CLAS data sets \cite{bradford}, for the reaction γ+pK++Λ{\gamma}+p {\to} K^{+} + {\Lambda} have been analyzed using associated Legendre polynomials. This analysis is based upon theoretical calculations in Ref. \cite{fasano} where all sixteen observables in kaon photoproduction can be classified into four Legendre classes. Each observable can be described by an expansion of associated Legendre polynomial functions. One of the questions to be addressed is how many associated Legendre polynomials are required to describe the data. In this preliminary analysis, we used data models with different numbers of associated Legendre polynomials. We then compared these models by calculating posterior probabilities of the models. We found that the CLAS data set needs no more than four associated Legendre polynomials to describe the differential cross section data. In addition, we also show the extracted coefficients of the best model.Comment: Talk given at APFB08, Depok, Indonesia, August, 19-23, 200

    Exploring the causes of adverse events in hospitals and potential prevention strategies

    Get PDF
    Objectives To examine the causes of adverse events (AEs) and potential prevention strategies to minimise the occurrence of AEs in hospitalised patients. Methods For the 744 AEs identified in the patient record review study in 21 Dutch hospitals, trained reviewers were asked to select all causal factors that contributed to the AE. The results were analysed together with data on preventability and consequences of AEs. In addition, the reviewers selected one or more prevention strategies for each preventable AE. The recommended prevention strategies were analysed together with four general causal categories: technical, human, organisational and patient-related factors. Results Human causes were predominantly involved in the causation of AEs (in 61% of the AEs), 61% of those being preventable and 13% leading to permanent disability. In 39% of the AEs, patient-related factors were involved, in 14% organisational factors and in 4% technical factors. Organisational causes contributed relatively often to preventable AEs (93%) and AEs resulting in permanent disability (20%). Recommended strategies to prevent AEs were quality assurance/peer review, evaluation of safety behaviour, training and procedures. For the AEs with human and patient-related causes, reviewers predominantly recommended quality assurance/peer review. AEs caused by organisational factors were considered preventable by improving procedures. Discussion Healthcare interventions directed at human causes are recommended because these play a large role in AE causation. In addition, it seems worthwhile to direct interventions on organisational causes because the AEs they cause are nearly always believed to be preventable. Organisational factors are thus relatively easy to tackle. Future research designs should allow researchers to interview healthcare providers that were involved in the event, as an additional source of information on contributing factors.

    Astrophysical weak-interaction rates for selected A=20A=20 and A=24A=24 nuclei

    Full text link
    We have evaluated the electron capture rates on 20^{20}Ne, 20^{20}F, 24^{24}Mg, 24^{24}Na and the β\beta decay rates for 20^{20}F and 24^{24}Na at temperature and density conditions relevant for the late-evolution stages of stars with M=8M=8-12 M_\odot. The rates are based on recent experimental data and large-scale shell model calculations. We show that the electron capture rates on 20^{20}Ne, 24^{24}Mg and the 20^{20}F, 24^{24}Na β\beta-decay rates are based on data in this astrophysical range, except for the capture rate on 20^{20}Ne, which we predict to have a dominating contribution from the second-forbidden transition between the 20^{20}Ne and 20^{20}F ground states in the density range logρYe(g cm3)=9.3\log \rho Y_e (\mathrm{g~cm}^{-3}) = 9.3-9.6. The dominance of a few individual transitions allows us to present the various rates by analytical expressions at the relevant astrophysical conditions. We also derive the screening corrections to the rates.Comment: 21 pages, 12 figure
    corecore