10 research outputs found
Recovery of dialysis patients with COVID-19 : health outcomes 3 months after diagnosis in ERACODA
Background. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related short-term mortality is high in dialysis patients, but longer-term outcomes are largely unknown. We therefore assessed patient recovery in a large cohort of dialysis patients 3 months after their COVID-19 diagnosis. Methods. We analyzed data on dialysis patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from 1 February 2020 to 31 March 2021 from the European Renal Association COVID-19 Database (ERACODA). The outcomes studied were patient survival, residence and functional and mental health status (estimated by their treating physician) 3 months after COVID-19 diagnosis. Complete follow-up data were available for 854 surviving patients. Patient characteristics associated with recovery were analyzed using logistic regression. Results. In 2449 hemodialysis patients (mean ± SD age 67.5 ± 14.4 years, 62% male), survival probabilities at 3 months after COVID-19 diagnosis were 90% for nonhospitalized patients (n = 1087), 73% for patients admitted to the hospital but not to an intensive care unit (ICU) (n = 1165) and 40% for those admitted to an ICU (n = 197). Patient survival hardly decreased between 28 days and 3 months after COVID-19 diagnosis. At 3 months, 87% functioned at their pre-existent functional and 94% at their pre-existent mental level. Only few of the surviving patients were still admitted to the hospital (0.8-6.3%) or a nursing home (∼5%). A higher age and frailty score at presentation and ICU admission were associated with worse functional outcome. Conclusions. Mortality between 28 days and 3 months after COVID-19 diagnosis was low and the majority of patients who survived COVID-19 recovered to their pre-existent functional and mental health level at 3 months after diagnosis
Flow measurements in dialysis shunts: lack of agreement between conventional Doppler, CVI-Q, and ultrasound dilution
BACKGROUND: Measuring flow in dialysis shunts is recommended to predict
imminent thrombosis. Multiple methods for measuring blood flow are in use.
Numerous ultrasound protocols exist which determine volume flow using a
conventional Doppler (CD) frequency shift analysis technique. All of these
are subject to potentially large errors. Quantitative colour velocity
index (CVI-Q) does not make use of the Doppler equation and is more
precise in vitro. Ultrasound dilution (UD) measures access flow during
dialysis in a non-operator-dependent way. The aim of the present study was
to compare these three methods of measuring access flow in vivo for
agreement with each other. METHODS: In 38 accesses flow was measured by
CD, CVI-Q, and UD. All measurements were done during dialysis. Agreement
was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC=R(i)) and
Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: ICC between UD and CVI-Q was R(i)=0.56.
ICC between UD and CD was R(i)=0.10, and ICC between CD and CVI-Q was
R(i)=0.16. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias (mean difference) of -38
ml/min between UD and CVI-Q, a bias of 1129 ml/min between UD and CD, and
a bias of 1167 ml/min between CVI-Q and CD. CONCLUSIONS: CD measurements
did not agree with UD or CVI-Q much higher values were recorded with the
former than with the latter two techniques. The agreement between UD and
CVI-Q measurements is low but reasonable. Caution must be applied in
comparing and interpreting values of access flow measured by different
techniques
A familial disorder with low bone density and renal phosphate wasting.
Item does not contain fulltextHereditary forms of renal phosphate wasting have been studied thoroughly in the past years. X-linked Hypophosphatemic rickets (XLH), autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets/osteomalacia (ADHR) and autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets (ARHR) are known genetic disorders in which a disturbance of phosphatonins is a causative factor in the pathogenesis. We describe a comparable but yet undescribed disorder in a family in which a 53 year old man presented with a spontaneous fracture after suffering for years with severe fatigue and musculoskeletal pains. A low serum phosphate was discovered. The two subsequent generations of this family developed the same symptoms but at an earlier age. Almost all family members have been investigated and the majority appears to have low bone density and/or renal phosphate wasting and/or low serum phosphate. Remarkably no rickets was found. No elevation of FGF23 or mutations in the gene encoding FGF23 were found. We believe this is a new familial disorder of bone metabolism and phosphate homeostasis in which a disturbance of bone modulators may play a central role
Differences in lipopolysaccharide profiles of serologically identical Legionella pneumophila serogroup 6 strains.
Questions and Answers from the F.I.X./More on UFH after LMWH/Carboprost (Hemabate) in Hemorrhagic Cystitis/Stability of Ferrlecit (Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex)/Pamidronate (Aredia) IV Weekly/Pantoprazole (Protonix) Continuous Infusion/Heparin Dosing in Cardiology Patients
Iron in the Treatment of Anemia in Dialysis Patients: An Important Support to Erythropoietin
Comparison of in Vivo Arteriovenous Fistula Volume Flow Measurements Using a Transonic Transit-Time Ultrasound Flow Device and Doppler Ultrasound
Sex differences in COVID-19 mortality risk in patients on kidney function replacement therapy
In the general population with COVID-19, the male sex is an established risk factor for mortality, in part due to a more robust immune response to COVID-19 in women. Because patients on kidney function replacement therapy (KFRT) have an impaired immune response, especially kidney transplant recipients due to their use of immunosuppressants, we examined whether the male sex is still a risk factor for mortality among patients on KFRT with COVID-19. From the European Renal Association COVID-19 Database (ERACODA), we examined patients on KFRT with COVID-19 who presented between February 1st, 2020, and April 30th, 2021. 1204 kidney transplant recipients (male 62.0%, mean age 56.4 years) and 3206 dialysis patients (male 61.8%, mean age 67.7 years) were examined. Three-month mortality in kidney transplant recipients was 16.9% in males and 18.6% in females (p = 0.31) and in dialysis patients 27.1% in males and 21.9% in females (p = 0.001). The adjusted HR for the risk of 3-month mortality in males (vs females) was 0.89 (95% CI 65, 1.23, p = 0.49) in kidney transplant recipients and 1.33 (95% CI 1.13, 1.56, p = 0.001) in dialysis patients (p = 0.02). In a fully adjusted model, the aHR for the risk of 3-month mortality in kidney transplant recipients (vs. dialysis patients) was 1.39 (95% CI 1.02, 1.89, p = 0.04) in males and 2.04 (95% CI 1.40, 2.97, p < 0.001) in females (p = 0.02). In patients on KFRT with COVID-19, the male sex is not a risk factor for mortality among kidney transplant recipients but remains a risk factor among dialysis patients. The use of immunosuppressants in kidney transplant recipients, among other factors, may have narrowed the difference in the immune response to COVID-19 between men and women, and therefore reduced the sex difference in COVID-19 mortality risk
COVID-19-related mortality in kidney transplant and dialysis patients: Results of the ERACODA collaboration
Background. Patients on kidney replacement therapy comprise a vulnerable population and may be at increased risk of death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Currently, only limited data are available on outcomes in this patient population. Methods. We set up the ERACODA (European Renal Association COVID-19 Database) database, which is specifically designed to prospectively collect detailed data on kidney transplant and dialysis patients with COVID-19. For this analysis, patients were included who presented between 1 February and 1 May 2020 and had complete information available on the primary outcome parameter, 28-day mortality. Results. Of the 1073 patients enrolled, 305 (28%) were kidney transplant and 768 (72%) dialysis patients with a mean age of 60 6 13 and 67 6 14 years, respectively. The 28-day probability of death was 21.3% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 14.3–30.2%] in kidney transplant and 25.0% (95% CI 20.2–30.0%) in dialysis patients. Mortality was primarily associated with advanced age in kidney transplant patients, and with age and frailty in dialysis patients. After adjusting for sex, age and frailty, in-hospital mortality did not significantly differ between transplant and dialysis patients [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% CI 0.59–1.10, P ¼ 0.18]. In the subset of dialysis patients who were a candidate for transplantation (n ¼ 148), 8 patients died within 28 days, as compared with 7 deaths in 23 patients who underwent a kidney transplantation <1 year before presentation (HR adjusted for sex, age and frailty 0.20, 95% CI 0.07–0.56, P < 0.01). Conclusions. The 28-day case-fatality rate is high in patients on kidney replacement therapy with COVID-19 and is primarily driven by the risk factors age and frailty. Furthermore, in the first year after kidney transplantation, patients may be at increased risk of COVID-19-related mortality as compared with dialysis patients on the waiting list for transplantation. This information is important in guiding clinical decision-making, and for informing the public and healthcare authorities on the COVID-19-related mortality risk in kidney transplant and dialysis patients. © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved
Clinical triage of patients on kidney replacement therapy presenting with COVID-19: An ERACODA registry analysis
Background: Patients on kidney replacement therapy (KRT) are at very high risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The triage pathway for KRT patients presenting to hospitals with varying severity of COVID-19 illness remains ill-defined. We studied the clinical characteristics of patients at initial and subsequent hospital presentations and the impact on patient outcomes. Methods: The European Renal Association COVID-19 Database (ERACODA) was analysed for clinical and laboratory features of 1423 KRT patients with COVID-19 either hospitalized or non-hospitalized at initial triage and those re-presenting a second time. Predictors of outcomes (hospitalization, 28-day mortality) were then determined for all those not hospitalized at initial triage. Results: Among 1423 KRT patients with COVID-19 [haemodialysis (HD), n = 1017; transplant, n = 406), 25% (n = 355) were not hospitalized at first presentation due to mild illness (30% HD, 13% transplant). Of the non-hospitalized patients, only 10% (n = 36) re-presented a second time, with a 5-day median interval between the two presentations (interquartile range 2-7 days). Patients who re-presented had worsening respiratory symptoms, a decrease in oxygen saturation (97% versus 90%) and an increase in C-reactive protein (26 versus 73 mg/L) and were older (72 vs 63 years) compared with those who did not return a second time. The 28-day mortality between early admission (at first presentation) and deferred admission (at second presentation) was not significantly different (29% versus 25%; P = 0.6). Older age, prior smoking history, higher clinical frailty score and self-reported shortness of breath at first presentation were identified as risk predictors of mortality when re-presenting after discharge at initial triage. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that KRT patients with COVID-19 and mild illness can be managed effectively with supported outpatient care and with vigilance of respiratory symptoms, especially in those with risk factors for poor outcomes. Our findings support a risk-stratified clinical approach to admissions and discharges of KRT patients presenting with COVID-19 to aid clinical triage and optimize resource utilization during the ongoing pandemic. © 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved