BeEAM Conditioning including High-Dose Bendamustine before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Is Safe and Effective in Patients with Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia.

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an option to consolidate remission in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM), particularly in selected younger patients with chemosensitive disease. BEAM, consisting of BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan, is often used as a conditioning regimen. However, problems with BCNU, including pneumotoxicity, tolerance, and availability, necessitate the search for alternatives. In this pilot study, we investigated high-dose chemotherapy with BeEAM, in which BCNU is replaced with high-dose bendamustine as an alternative conditioning regimen in six subsequent patients with WM. Bendamustine treatment was well tolerated without unexpected toxicities. The overall response rate was 6/6 patients (2 very good partial responses (VGPR) and 4 PR). After a median follow-up of 72 months, two (33%) patients relapsed. Median progression-free and overall survivals were not reached, and no severe late-onset toxicities were observed so far. In this pilot study, BeEAM conditioning before ASCT seems feasible, safe, and effective in patients with WM

Adding bendamustine to melphalan before ASCT improves CR rate in myeloma vs. melphalan alone: A randomized phase-2 trial.

Definite cure remains exceptional in myeloma patients even after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with melphalan (Mel) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Thus, improving efficacy of HDCT in MM remains an unresolved issue. This randomized phase II trial compared standard 200 mg/m2 Mel HDCT to experimental HDCT with 200 mg/m2 bendamustine, given both at days -4 and -3, combined with 100 mg/m2 melphalan at days -2 and -1 (BenMel) before ASCT as first-line consolidation in myeloma patients. The primary endpoint aimed to identify at least a 15% improvement in the complete remission rate (stringent CR + CR) after HDCT with BenMel compared with Mel alone. A total of 120 MM patients were 1:1 randomized. The rate of sCR/CR after ASCT was higher in BenMel than in Mel treated patients (70.0% vs. 51.7%; p = 0.039). Three patients in the BenMel group (5.0%) had reversible acute renal insufficiency compared with none in Mel patients. Minimal residual disease negativity (<10-5) by flow cytometry was observed in 26 (45.6%) BenMel patients and 22 (37.9%) in the Mel group (p = 0.375). Our data suggest that BenMel HDCT is safe and improves the sCR/CR rate compared with standard Mel alone

BeEAM conditioning with bendamustine-replacing BCNU before autologous transplantation is safe and effective in lymphoma patients.

BEAM with BCNU is commonly used for conditioning treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, pulmonary toxicity and availability issues associated with BCNU prompted us to evaluate bendamustine-replacing BCNU (BeEAM). We analyzed 39 lymphoma patients receiving BeEAM conditioning with 200 mg/m(2) bendamustine at days -7 and -6. The median duration until neutrophil recovery was 11 days, and 15 days for platelet recovery (>20 g/L). The most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities comprised mucosal side effects (27 pts.). Pulmonary toxicity was observed in one patient (2.5%), and one patient died of septic complications. The CR rate increased from 33% to 74% 100 days after ASCT. After a median follow-up of 18.5 months, progression and death each occurred in 11 patients (28%). Median progression-free and overall survival at 2 years were 69% and 72%. Our data suggest that BeEAM conditioning using bendamustine is safe and results in promising survival rates

Combined therapy with ibrutinib and bortezomib followed by ibrutinib maintenance in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma and high-risk features: a phase 1/2 trial of the European MCL network (SAKK 36/13).

BACKGROUND The Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib have single-agent activity, non-overlapping toxicities, and regulatory approval in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In vitro, their combination provides synergistic cytotoxicity. In this investigator-initiated phase 1/2 trial, we established the recommended phase 2 dose of ibrutinib in combination with bortezomib, and assessed its efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. METHODS In this phase 1/2 study open in 15 sites in Switzerland, Germany and Italy, patients with relapsed or refractory MCL after ≤2 lines of chemotherapy and both ibrutinib-naïve and bortezomib-naïve received six cycles of ibrutinibb and bortezomib, followed by ibrutinib maintenance. For the phase 1 study, a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of ibrutinib in combination with bortezomib. The primary endpoint in phase 1 was the dose limiting toxicities in cycle 1. The phase 2 study was an open-label, single-arm trial with a Simon's two-stage min-max design, with a primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR) assessed by CT/MRI. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02356458. FINDINGS Between August 2015 and September 2016, nine patients were treated in the phase 1 study, and 49 patients were treated between November 2016 and March 2020 in the phase 2 of the trial. The ORR was 81.8% (90% CI 71.1, 89.8%, CR(u) 21.8%) which increased with continued ibrutinib (median 10.6 months) to 87.3%, (CR(u) 41.8%). 75.6% of patients had at least one high-risk feature (Ki-67 > 30%, blastoid or pleomorphic variant, p53 overexpression, TP53 mutations and/or deletions). In these patients, ibrutinib and bortezomib were also effective with an ORR of 74%, increasing to 82% during maintenance. With a median follow-up of 25.4 months, the median duration of response was 22.7, and the median PFS was 18.6 months. PFS reached 30.8 and 32.9 months for patients with a CR or Cru, respectively. INTERPRETATION The combination of ibrutinib and bortezomib shows durable efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL, also in the presence of high-risk features. FUNDING SAKK (Hubacher Fund), Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation, Swiss Cancer Research Foundation, and Janssen

Blinatumomab in Relapsed/Refractory Burkitt Lymphoma

In patients with relapsed/refractory Burkitt lymphoma (r/r BL), overall survival (OS) is poor, and effective therapies and evidence for the best therapy are lacking. The monoclonal antibody blinatumomab may represent a novel option. However, only limited data on the use of blinatumomab in r/r BL are so far available. This multi-center, retrospective case series investigated nine patients with r/r BL treated with blinatumomab. The safety of blinatumomab was assessed with respect to frequency and severity of adverse effects (AEs) infections, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS), OS and overall response rate (ORR) were analyzed to assess efficacy. No AEs &gt; grade 2 occurred, and AEs were generally treatable and fully reversible. The best response to blinatumomab was complete remission in 3/9 patients and partial remission in 2/9, whilst 4/9 presented with progressive disease. Median PFS and OS were 2 and 6 months, respectively, ranging from 5 days to 32 months and 11 days to 32 months, respectively. Blinatumomab treatment was a successful bridging treatment to stem cell transplantation in 3/9 patients. The response to blinatumomab varied widely, and only one patient survived longer term, but activity in patients with r/r BL was evident in some patients, with its use being safe, warranting its prospective investigation