Incorporating laparoscopy in the practice of a gynecologic oncology service: Actual impact beyond clinical trials data

Background: Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic management of gynecologic cancers have been established by numerous clinical trials. However, the degree to which such results are achievable outside the context of formal research programs and the actual extent of laparoscopy uptake since its introduction are unclear. Purpose of this study was to examine the impact upon operative and cancer outcomes of the incorporation of laparoscopy into the surgical practice of our gynecologic oncology service. Methods: Data from 383 consecutive women undergoing surgery for the treatment of an apparently early-stage gynecologic cancer between 2000 and 2008 were analyzed. Integration of minimally access surgery for the treatment of invasive malignancies began with borderline ovarian tumors in 2001 and proceeded sequentially to include endometrial, ovarian, and cervical cancer patients. Results: The annual proportion of laparoscopic cases has increased significantly over the study period from 7.7% in 2001 to 90.9% in 2008 (P < 0.0001 for trend). A temporal trend toward reduction in estimated blood loss was observed in both endometrial cancer and cervical cancer patients (P < 0.0001). There was a significant decrease in the percentage of patients requiring blood transfusions [18 (17.1%) during the period 2000-2002, 19 (13.6%) during 2003-2005, and 8 (5.8%) during 2006-2008; P = 0.005 for trend]. Length of hospital stay has decreased significantly over time for all disease sites (P < 0.0001 for endometrial and cervical cancer; P = 0.02 for ovarian cancer). No difference was found in median operative time, number of lymph nodes harvested, complication rates, 1- and 2-year disease-free survival, and overall survival when data of subsequent time periods were compared. Conclusions: Substantial utilization of laparoscopy in the existing practice of a gynecologic oncology service provided benefits to patients without detrimental effects on clinical outcomes. The relatively short follow-up time of laparoscopic cases disallows firm conclusions on long-term survival

Microlaparoscopy: a further development of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer staging -- initial experience

OBJECTIVE: To present our initial experience with micro-laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer and to compare its outcomes with those of conventional laparoscopic approach. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing surgical staging of endometrial cancer using exclusively 3-mm working ports and a 3- or 5-mm laparoscope at the umbilicus (microlaparoscopy group; N=23) were compared with historical controls selected from consecutive women who have had staging with conventional laparoscopy (N=80). RESULTS: No difference was found in demographics and preoperative variables between the two groups. Conversion from microlaparoscopy to a conventional laparoscopic technique occurred in two cases (9.7%), while there was no conversion to open surgical staging in either group. There were no significant differences between the microlaparoscopy group and the control group with regard to estimated blood loss [100 (10-400) vs. 100 (10-400), P=0.09], number of pelvic lymph nodes (19.2+/-7.4 vs. 18. 6+/-7.2, P=0.79), and complication rate (intraoperative: 0% vs. 2.5%, P=1.0; postoperative: 8.7% vs. 13.7%, P=0.73). Operative time was similar between groups when analysis was restricted to the last 20 conventional procedures performed period prior to beginning of the microlaparoscopy trial [155 (110-300) vs. 160 (115-295), P=0.17]. The median length of hospital stay was 2 (1-10) days for women undergoing microlaparoscopic procedures compared to 3 (1-15) days for those undergoing conventional laparoscopy (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that microlaparoscopy is a safe and adequate surgical option for endometrial cancer staging, with the potential to further decrease invasiveness of the conventional laparoscopic approach

Infectious morbidity after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: does concomitant salpingectomy make a difference?

The study was aimed to test the hypothesis that preservation of the fallopian tubes at the time of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) increases the risk for postoperative infection. The study group consisted of 137 consecutive women undergoing TLH with conservation of the ovaries, who had concomitant bilateral total salpingectomy at the time of TLH. The control group included 145 women who had had TLH without salpingo-oophorectomy before the study period. Women undergoing bilateral total salpingectomy at the time of TLH had a lower rate of infectious morbidity compared with those who had TLH alone (3/137 versus 14/145, P = 0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that bilateral total salpingectomy at the time of TLH and blood loss are independent predictors of infectious morbidity

Incorporating laparoscopy in the practice of a gynecologic oncology service: actual impact beyond clinical trials data.

Background: Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic management of gynecologic cancers have been established by numerous clinical trials. However, the degree to which such results are achievable outside the context of formal research programs and the actual extent of laparoscopy uptake since its introduction are unclear. Purpose of this study was to examine the impact upon operative and cancer outcomes of the incorporation of laparoscopy into the surgical practice of our gynecologic oncology service. Methods: Data from 383 consecutive women undergoing surgery for the treatment of an apparently early-stage gynecologic cancer between 2000 and 2008 were analyzed. Integration of minimally access surgery for the treatment of invasive malignancies began with borderline ovarian tumors in 2001 and proceeded sequentially to include endometrial, ovarian, and cervical cancer patients. Results: The annual proportion of laparoscopic cases has increased significantly over the study period from 7.7% in 2001 to 90.9% in 2008 (P < 0.0001 for trend). A temporal trend toward reduction in estimated blood loss was observed in both endometrial cancer and cervical cancer patients (P < 0.0001). There was a significant decrease in the percentage of patients requiring blood transfusions [18 (17.1%) during the period 2000-2002, 19 (13.6%) during 2003-2005, and 8 (5.8%) during 2006-2008; P = 0.005 for trend]. Length of hospital stay has decreased significantly over time for all disease sites (P < 0.0001 for endometrial and cervical cancer; P = 0.02 for ovarian cancer). No difference was found in median operative time, number of lymph nodes harvested, complication rates, 1- and 2-year disease-free survival, and overall survival when data of subsequent time periods were compared. Conclusions: Substantial utilization of laparoscopy in the existing practice of a gynecologic oncology service provided benefits to patients without detrimental effects on clinical outcomes. The relatively short follow-up time of laparoscopic cases disallows firm conclusions on long-term survival