72 research outputs found

    IMP 8 magnetosheath field comparisons with models

    Get PDF

    Quantifying the Storm Time Thermospheric Neutral Density Variations Using Model and Observations

    Full text link
    Accurate determination of thermospheric neutral density holds crucial importance for satellite drag calculations. The problem is twofold and involves the correct estimation of the quiet time climatology and storm time variations. In this work, neutral density estimations from two empirical and three physicsâ based models of the ionosphereâ thermosphere are compared with the neutral densities along the Challenging Microâ Satellite Payload satellite track for six geomagnetic storms. Storm time variations are extracted from neutral density by (1) subtracting the mean difference between model and observation (bias), (2) setting climatological variations to zero, and (3) multiplying model data with the quiet time ratio between the model and observation. Several metrics are employed to evaluate the model performances. We find that the removal of bias or climatology reveals actual performance of the model in simulating the storm time variations. When bias is removed, depending on event and model, storm time errors in neutral density can decrease by an amount of 113% or can increase by an amount of 12% with respect to error in models with quiet time bias. It is shown that using only average and maximum values of neutral density to determine the model performances can be misleading since a model can estimate the averages fairly well but may not capture the maximum value or vice versa. Since each of the metrics used for determining model performances provides different aspects of the error, among these, we suggest employing mean absolute error, prediction efficiency, and normalized root mean square error together as a standard set of metrics for the neutral density.Plain Language SummaryThermospheric neutral density is the largest source of uncertainty in atmospheric drag calculations. Consequently, mission and maneuver planning, satellite lifetime predictions, collision avoidance, and orbit determination depend on the accurate estimation of the thermospheric neutral density. Thermospheric neutral density varies in different timescales. In short timescales, the largest variations occur due to the geomagnetic storms. Several empirical and physicsâ based models of the ionosphereâ thermosphere system are used for estimating the variations in the neutral density. However, the storm time responses from the models are clouded by the climatology (background variations), upon which the effect of geomagnetic storms is superimposed. In this work, we show that it is critical to use reference levels for the neutral density to extract the true performance of the models for the evaluation of the storm time performances. We demonstrate that mean absolute error, prediction efficiency, and normalized root mean square error should be considered together for the performance evaluations, since each of them provides different aspects of the error.Key PointsUsing the average and maximum values of neutral densities to determine the model performances can be misleadingRemoving the quiet time trend from the neutral density reveals the actual performance of the model in simulating the storm time variationsMean absolute error, prediction efficiency, and normalized root mean square error should be considered together for the evaluationsPeer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148396/1/swe20816_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148396/2/swe20816-sup-0001-2018SW002033-SI.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148396/3/swe20816.pd

    The Earth: Plasma Sources, Losses, and Transport Processes

    Get PDF
    This paper reviews the state of knowledge concerning the source of magnetospheric plasma at Earth. Source of plasma, its acceleration and transport throughout the system, its consequences on system dynamics, and its loss are all discussed. Both observational and modeling advances since the last time this subject was covered in detail (Hultqvist et al., Magnetospheric Plasma Sources and Losses, 1999) are addressed

    IMP 8 magnetosheath field comparisons with models

    No full text
    This study presents cross-sectional vector maps of the magnetic field derived from IMP 8 magnetometer in the magnetosheath at 30 Re behind the Earth. In addition the vector patterns of the magnetosheath field for northward, southward, and east-west interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) directions are qualitatively compared with those obtained from the Spreiter-Stahara gas dynamic (GD) and Fedder-Lyon magnetohydrodynamic models (MHD). The main purpose is to display the cross-sectional differences in relation to the dayside merging with different IMF directions, allowing the reader to make direct visual comparisons of the vector patterns. It is seen that for east-west IMF directions, the data-based and MHD-based patterns differ noticeably in a similar way from the GD model, presumably reflecting the influence of dayside magnetic merging of the Earth's magnetic field with the y-component of the interplanetary magnetic field. All three northward IMF cross sections show comparable field draping patterns as expected for a closed magnetosphere. For southward IMF case, on the other hand, differences between the three cross-sectional patterns are greater as seen in the field vector sizes and directions, especially closer to the magnetopause where more disturbed magnetospheric conditions are known to be exist. The data comparisons with the MHD and GD models show that the differences result from the magnetic field-flow coupling and that the effects of dayside reconnection are present in IMP 8 magnetic field measurements.Keywords. Vector maps · IMP 8 magnetometer · Inter-planetary magnetic field

    IMP 8 magnetosheath field comparisons with models

    No full text

    Some explanations for Et-Tuhfetü'z-Zekiyye Fi'l-Lûgati't-Türkiyye [Et-tuhfetü'z-zekiyye fi'l-lûgati't-türkiyye hakkinda bazi açiklamalar]

    No full text
    In Turkology research, language used in the studies on Egypt and Syria is mainly refered to as Mamluk Kiptchakish. Dictionaries and grammars were prepared in the 14th and-15th centuries to teach Turkish Language to the Arabs as Turkish Language gained great importance during the period of Mamlukes. Among these works, Et-Tuhfetü'z-Zekiyye fil-Lûgati't-Türkiyye was one of the most important works written in Mamluk Kiptchakish. The work on which a lot of study h done so far was first introduced in 1945 by Besim Atalay. This study focuses on the words thought to be misinterpreted, unnoticed and left unanswered in the previous research. The aim of this study is to better understand the so called work in the light of the former studies and to contribute to a thorough interpretation

    The possible effect of the IMF By and Bz components on the high latitude COST 251 area

    No full text
    The possible effects of the orientation of the IMF on the ionosphere has been studied by Tulunay (1995) using foF2 data from 15 ionospheric stations in Europe over the COST 238 area. The results showed that a good amount of the day to day variability of the mid-latitude ionospheric F region could be related to changes in orientation of the southward IMF Bz. This variability is quantified as the maximum change of delta foF2. This paper investigates the effects of By distribution on the ionospheric critical frequencies. (C) 1997 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd
    corecore