Innovation in Public Health: A Timely Methodological Opportunity to Reimagine and Operationalize Variables in Research

EditorialEditoria

Family-based pediatric weight management interventions in US primary care settings targeting children ages 6-12 years old: A systematic review guided by the RE-AIM framework.

Obesity is a pandemic that disproportionately affects children from vulnerable populations in the USA. Current treatment approaches in primary care settings in the USA have been reported to be insufficient at managing pediatric obesity, primarily due to implementation challenges for healthcare systems and barriers for families. While the literature has examined the efficacy of pediatric obesity interventions focused on internal validity, it lacks sufficient reporting and analysis of external validity necessary for successful translation to primary care settings. We conducted a systematic review of the primary-care-setting literature from January 2007 to March 2020 on family-based pediatric weight management interventions in both English and/or Spanish for children ages 6-12 years in the USA using the Reach, Efficacy/Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. A literature search, using PRISMA guidelines, was conducted in January 2022 using the following electronic databases: Medline Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane Library. 22 270 records were screened, and 376 articles were reviewed in full. 184 studies were included. The most commonly reported dimensions of the RE-AIM framework were Reach (65%), Efficacy/Effectiveness (64%), and Adoption (64%), while Implementation (47%) and Maintenance (42%) were less often reported. The prevalence of reporting RE-AIM construct indicators ranged greatly, from 1% to 100%. This systematic review underscores the need for more focus on external validity to guide the development, implementation, and dissemination of future pediatric obesity interventions based in primary care settings. It also suggests conducting additional research on sustainable financing for pediatric obesity interventions

Use of electronic health records to develop a more robust phenotype of pediatric overweight and obesity

Clinical EHR data can be used to better develop a more robust phenotype of pediatric overweight and obesity

The Implementation and Five-Year Evolution of a Childhood Healthy Weight Program: Making a Health Care-Community Partnership Work

Sustained implementation of moderate to high-intensity interventions to treat childhood obesity meets many barriers. This report uses the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Replicating Effective Programs framework to describe and evaluate the implementation of a 5-year health care-community collaborative program. Interviews with program leadership provided information on setting, organizational culture, program creation and adaptation, and costs. Administrative data were used for number of sessions and their characteristics; referrals; and 2018-2019 participant enrollment, attendance, completion numbers, and completer outcomes. Preconditions for this program were high childhood obesity prevalence, and the complementary strengths of the health care organization (primary care treatment referral stream, population health orientation, alternative Medicaid funding) and the community organization (accessible space and time, staffing model, and organization mission). Preimplementation steps included collaborative design of a curriculum and allocation of administrative tasks. Implementation led to simultaneous deployment in as many as 17 community locations, with sessions offered free to families weekday evenings or weekends, delivered in English or Spanish. From 2018 to 2019, 2746 children were referred from nearly 300 providers, 832 (30.3%) enrolled, and 553 (66.3%) attended at least once, with 392 (70.8% of attenders and 47.1% of enrolled) completing the program. Outcomes in completers included improvement in %BMI [-2.34 (standard deviation, SD 4.19)] and Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run (PACER) laps [2.46 (SD 4.74)],  < 0.0001 for both. Evolution, including in referral process, Spanish program material and delivery, and range of ages, occurred continuously rather than at discrete intervals. Major system disruptions also affected the implementation. Maintenance of the program relied on the health care organization's administrative team and the collaboration with the community organization. This program's collaboration across organizations and ongoing adaptation were necessary to build and sustain a program with broad reach and positive health outcomes. The lessons learned may be helpful for other programs

Contemporary Political and Social Issues

Hoyoon Jung, Pukyong National University, “Latin America-EU Relations in the Twenty-First Century. Cruz Bonlarron Martínez, Fulbright Colombia, “A Review of Literature on la Reforma Rural Integral (Comprehensive Rural Reform). Joshua S. Yudkin, The University of Texas Health Science at Houston (UTHealth), “Locating and Evaluating La ciencia de la complejidad as a Public Health Approach in and for Colombia. Emily Fitzgerald, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville,”Indigenous Women in Guatemala Organizing for Better Lives. Carolina Rocha, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, “An Incarcerated Latina Mother and the War on Drugs: Yraida’s Story. Moderator: Patrick G. Anderson Avilés, University of Illinois Springfiel

Patient-Reported Barriers to Completing a Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Among Uninsured Patients.

BackgroundFor colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to improve survival, patients with an abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) must follow-up with a diagnostic colonoscopy. Adherence to follow-up is low and patient-level barriers for suboptimal adherence have yet to be explored.ObjectiveTo characterize barriers for non-completion of diagnostic colonoscopy after an abnormal FIT reported by under- and uninsured patients receiving care in a safety-net health system.DesignA longitudinal, cohort study of CRC screening outreach to 8565 patients using mailed FIT kits. Patients with abnormal FIT results received telephonic navigation to arrange for a no-cost diagnostic colonoscopy.PatientsAdults aged 50-64&nbsp;years receiving care at a North Texas safety-net health system.ApproachDescriptive analyses characterized the patient sample and reasons for lack of follow-up after abnormal FIT over the 3-year outreach program. Thematic qualitative analyses characterized reasons for lack of follow-up with a colonoscopy after the abnormal FIT.Key resultsOf 689 patients with an abnormal FIT, 45% (n = 314) did not complete a follow-up colonoscopy. Among the 314 non-completers, 184 patients reported reasons for not completing a follow-up colonoscopy included health insurance-related challenges (38%), comorbid conditions (37%), social barriers such as transportation difficulties and lack of social support (29%), concerns about FIT/colonoscopy process (12%), competing life priorities (12%), adverse effects of bowel preparation (3%), and poor health literacy (3%). Among the 314 non-completers, 131 patients did not report a barrier, as 51% reported that that had completed a previous colonoscopy in the past 10&nbsp;years, 10% refused with no reason, and 10% were never reached by phone.ConclusionsFuture studies aimed at improving FIT screening and subsequent colonoscopy rates need to address the unique needs of patients for effective and sustainable screening programs.Trial registrationNCT01946282

Evaluation of Harms Reporting in U.S. Cancer Screening Guidelines

BACKGROUND: Cancer screening should be recommended only when the balance between benefits and harms is favorable. This review evaluated how U.S. cancer screening guidelines reported harms, within and across organ-specific processes to screen for cancer. OBJECTIVE: To describe current reporting practices and identify opportunities for improvement. DESIGN: Review of guidelines. SETTING: United States. PATIENTS: Patients eligible for screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer according to U.S. guidelines. MEASUREMENTS: Information was abstracted on reporting of patient-level harms associated with screening, diagnostic follow-up, and treatment. The authors classified harms reporting as not mentioned, conceptual, qualitative, or quantitative and noted whether literature was cited when harms were described. Frequency of harms reporting was summarized by organ type. RESULTS: Harms reporting was inconsistent across organ types and at each step of the cancer screening process. Guidelines did not report all harms for any specific organ type or for any category of harm across organ types. The most complete harms reporting was for prostate cancer screening guidelines and the least complete for colorectal cancer screening guidelines. Conceptualization of harms and use of quantitative evidence also differed by organ type. LIMITATIONS: This review considers only patient-level harms. The authors did not verify accuracy of harms information presented in the guidelines. CONCLUSION: The review identified opportunities for improving conceptualization, assessment, and reporting of screening process-related harms in guidelines. Future work should consider nuances associated with each organ-specific process to screen for cancer, including which harms are most salient and where evidence gaps exist, and explicitly explore how to optimally weigh available evidence in determining net screening benefit. Improved harms reporting could aid informed decision making, ultimately improving cancer screening delivery. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Cancer Institute