Clinical characteristics of sarcoidosis patients in Belgium

doi: 10.1080/17843286.2020.1821493status: publishe

Towards the Essence of Progressiveness: Bringing Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (PF-ILD) to the Next Stage

Although only recently introduced in the ILD community, the concept of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) has rapidly acquired an important place in the management of non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibrosing ILD (nonIPF fILD) patients. It confirms a clinical gut feeling that an important subgroup of nonIPF fILD portends a dismal prognosis despite therapeutically addressing the alleged triggering event. Due to several recently published landmark papers showing a treatment benefit with currently available antifibrotic drugs in PF-ILD patients, endorsing a PF-ILD phenotype has vital therapeutic consequences. Importantly, defining progressiveness is based on former progression, which has proven to be a rather moderate predictor of future progression. As fibrosis extent >20% and the presence of honeycombing have superior predictive properties regarding future progression, we advocate immediate initiation of antifibrotic treatment in the presence of these risk factors. In this perspective, we describe the historical context wherein PF-ILD has emerged, determine the currently employed PF-ILD criteria and their inherent limitations and propose new directions to mature its definition. Finally, while ascertaining progression in a nonIPF fILD patient clearly demonstrates the need for (additional) therapy, in the future, therapeutic decisions should be taken after assessing which pathway is ultimately driving the progression. Although not readily available, pathophysiological insight and diagnostic means are emergent to go full steam ahead in this novel direction.status: publishe

Progression in the Management of Non-Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Interstitial Lung Diseases, Where Are We Now and Where We Would Like to Be

A significant proportion of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) may develop a progressive fibrosing phenotype characterized by worsening of symptoms and pulmonary function, progressive fibrosis on chest computed tomography and increased mortality. The clinical course in these patients mimics the relentless progressiveness of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Common pathophysiological mechanisms such as a shared genetic susceptibility and a common downstream pathway—self-sustaining fibroproliferation—support the concept of a progressive fibrosing phenotype, which is applicable to a broad range of non-IPF ILDs. While antifibrotic drugs became the standard of care in IPF, immunosuppressive agents are still the mainstay of treatment in non-IPF fibrosing ILD (F-ILD). However, recently, randomized placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of antifibrotic treatment in systemic sclerosis-associated F-ILD and a broad range of F-ILDs with a progressive phenotype. This review summarizes the current pharmacological management and highlights the unmet needs in patients with non-IPF ILD

Montelukast for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation: A randomized controlled trial

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) remains the major problem which precludes long-term survival after lung transplantation. Previously, an open label pilot study from our group demonstrated a possible beneficial effect of montelukast in progressive BOS patients with low airway neutrophilia (2years posttransplant) BOS ≥1. Primary end-point was freedom from graft loss 1 year after randomization; secondary end-points were acute rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, respiratory infection rate; and change in FEV1, airway and systemic inflammation during the study period. Graft loss at 1 y and 2y was similar in both groups (respectively p = 0. 981 and p = 0.230). Montelukast had no effect on lung function decline in the overall cohort. However, in a post-hoc subanalysis of BOS stage 1 patients, montelukast attenuated further decline of FEV1 during the study period, both in absolute (L) (p = 0.008) and % predicted value (p = 0.0180). A linear mixed model confirmed this association. Acute rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, respiratory infections, systemic and airway inflammation were comparable between groups over the study period. This randomized controlled trial showed no additional survival benefit with montelukast compared to placebo, although the study was underpowered. The administration of montelukast was associated with an attenuation of the rate of FEV1 decline, however, only in recipients with late-onset BOS stage 1.status: publishe

Supplementary Material for: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Flex 19G Needles versus 22G Needles for Endobronchial Ultrasonography in Suspected Lung Cancer

<b><i>Background:</i></b> A flexible 19-gauge (Flex 19G) needle has been developed for endobronchial ultrasonography. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> We aimed to evaluate quantitative and qualitative specimen characteristics of Flex 19G in a randomized controlled setting for patients with suspected lung cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We undertook a single-center, randomized, controlled trial. A computer-generated randomization assigned all enrolled patients 1: 1 to undergo endobronchial ultrasonography using a Flex 19G or a 22-gauge (22G) needle for lymph node tissue sampling. Pathologists were blinded to the group assignment. The primary end point was histological tissue core procurement. The secondary end points were diagnostic yield, specimen bloodiness and overall quality, tissue surface area and performance for next-generation sequencing (NGS), and procedure-related complications. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Between June 2016 and February 2017, we randomly allocated a total of 78 patients: 39 patients to Flex 19G and 39 patients to 22G. No superiority in tissue core procurement was observed for Flex 19G compared to 22G (67 vs. 72%, <i>p</i> = 0.81). No significant difference was observed in diagnostic yield and overall specimen quality, but transbronchial needle aspiration specimens by Flex 19G were bloodier and had a larger tissue surface area. NGS was successful for clinically relevant genes in 96% and for all 26 genes tested in 81% of the samples. There was no difference in clinically relevant complications. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> No superiority is observed for Flex 19G in histological tissue core procurement rate. The Flex 19G needle could be considered when a larger tissue surface is of special interest