Are herders protected by their herds? An experimental analysis of zooprophylaxis against the malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis

Background The number of Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) and Anopheles pharoensis caught by human and cattle baits was investigated experimentally in the Arba Minch district of southern Ethiopia to determine if attraction to humans, indoors or outdoors, was affected by the presence or absence of cattle. Methods Field studies were made of the effect of a surrounding ring (10 m radius) of 20 cattle on the numbers of mosquitoes collected by human-baited sampling methods (i) inside or (ii) outside a hut. Results The numbers of An. arabiensis caught outdoors by a human landing catch (HLC) with or without a ring of cattle were not significantly different (2 × 2 Latin square comparisons: means = 24.8 and 37.2 mosquitoes/night, respectively; n = 12, P > 0.22, Tukey HSD), whereas, the numbers of An. pharoensis caught were significantly reduced (44%) by a ring of cattle (4.9 vs. 8.7; n = 12, P 0.999) or An. pharoensis (n = 48, P > 0.870). The HLC catches indoors vs. outdoors were not significantly different for either An. arabiensis or An. pharoensis (n = 12, P > 0.969), but for An. arabiensis only, the indoor catch was reduced significantly by 49% when the hut was surrounded by cattle (Tukey HSD, n = 12, P > 0.01). Conclusions Outdoors, a preponderance of cattle (20:1, cattle:humans) does not provide any material zooprophylactic effect against biting by An. arabiensis. For a human indoors, the presence of cattle outdoors nearly halved the catch. Unfortunately, this level of reduction would not have an appreciable impact on malaria incidence in an area with typically > 1 infective bite/person/night. For An. pharoensis, cattle significantly reduced the human catch indoors and outdoors, but still only by about half. These results suggest that even for traditional pastoralist communities of East Africa, the presence of large numbers of cattle does not confer effective zooprophylaxis against malaria transmitted by An. arabiensis or An. pharoensis

On the Stanley Depth of Squarefree Veronese Ideals

Let $K$ be a field and $S=K[x_1,...,x_n]$. In 1982, Stanley defined what is now called the Stanley depth of an $S$-module $M$, denoted \sdepth(M), and conjectured that \depth(M) \le \sdepth(M) for all finitely generated $S$-modules $M$. This conjecture remains open for most cases. However, Herzog, Vladoiu and Zheng recently proposed a method of attack in the case when $M = I / J$ with $J \subset I$ being monomial $S$-ideals. Specifically, their method associates $M$ with a partially ordered set. In this paper we take advantage of this association by using combinatorial tools to analyze squarefree Veronese ideals in $S$. In particular, if $I_{n,d}$ is the squarefree Veronese ideal generated by all squarefree monomials of degree $d$, we show that if $1\le d\le n < 5d+4$, then \sdepth(I_{n,d})= \floor{\binom{n}{d+1}\Big/\binom{n}{d}}+d, and if $d\geq 1$ and $n\ge 5d+4$, then d+3\le \sdepth(I_{n,d}) \le \floor{\binom{n}{d+1}\Big/\binom{n}{d}}+d.Comment: 10 page

Initial success of native grasses is contingent on multiple interactions among exotic grass competition, temporal priority, rainfall and site effects.

Ecological communities are increasingly being recognized as the products of contemporary drivers and historical legacies that are both biotic and abiotic. In an attempt to unravel multiple layers of ecological contingency, we manipulated (i) competition with exotic annual grasses, (ii) the timing of this competition (temporal priority in arrival/seeding times) and (iii) watering (simulated rainfall) in a restoration-style planting of native perennial grasses. In addition, we replicated this experiment simultaneously at three sites in north-central California. Native perennial grasses had 73-99 % less cover when planted with exotic annuals than when planted alone, but this reduction was greatly ameliorated by planting the natives 2 weeks prior to the exotics. In a drought year, irrigation significantly reduced benefits of early planting so that these benefits resembled those observed in a non-drought year. There were significant differences across the three sites (site effects and interactions) in (i) overall native cover, (ii) the response of natives to competition, (iii) the strength of the temporal priority effect and (iv) the degree to which supplemental watering reduced priority effects. These results reveal the strong multi-layered contingency that underlies even relatively simple communities

Invasion of Plant Communities

Due to numerous human activities, organisms have been transported and either accidentally or deliberately introduced all around the globe. Biological invasions are now considered to be one of the main drivers of global change because many invasive plants have severe ecological, economic, and health consequences. Thus, there is an ever-growing need to better understand invasions to determine how specific plant species are able to establish in communities and, in many cases, expand their range. Here, we describe the invasion process and how it contributes to the invasion of plant communities. We present an invasion-factor framework (IFF) model that uses three factors (climate dynamics, ecosystem resistance, and invader fitness) to explain how each plays a role in the introduction of plants and their ultimate failure or success (i.e., becoming invasive). The invasion of plant communities starts with the uptake of propagules from the native range, followed by their transport to and release into a new territory, where they become established and can spread or expand. Propagule pressure, prior adaptation, anthropogenically induced adaptation to invade, and post-introduction evolution are several theories that have been posed to explain the establishment of invasive plants. Further, traits of invasive plants, either before (existing) or after (developed) introduction, provide a mechanistic understanding with direct ties to the three factors of the IFF. The IFF is a general guide with which to study the invasion process based on specific factors for individual invaders and their target communities. The IFF combines (a) climatic dynamics, analogous to environmental filters; (b) ecosystem resistance, which prevents invasive plants from becoming established even if they are able to overcome the climate factor; and (c) invader fitness, relating to the genetic diversity of invasive plants, which allows them to become established after overcoming climate and ecosystem resistance factors. Case studies from the literature provide examples of research investigating each of the three factors of the IFF, but none exist that describe all the factors at once for any given invasive plant species. The application of the IFF for management is most appropriate once an invasive plant has become established, as preventative measures before this point rely only on accurate identification (detection) and removal (response). The IFF model should be considered as a tool to establish research priorities and identify components in the invasion process and inform restoration efforts. We advocate that the IFF should be integrated into management practices to help in the decision-making process that contributes to more effective practices that reduce the occurrence and impacts of invasive plants in a range of communities