202 research outputs found

    Are Popular Observational Maternal Sensitivity Measures Consistent in their Assessment of Maternal Sensitivity in North America?

    Get PDF
    This study examined three observational maternal sensitivity measures, Emotional Availability Scales (EAS; Biringen, Robinson, & Emde, 1998; Biringen, 2008), the Parent Child Interaction Nursing Child Assessment Satellite Training Feeding Scale (NCAFS; Barnard 1978; Oxford & Findlay, 2015), Mini-Maternal Behaviour Q Sort (MBQS; Moran, Pederson & Bento, 2009), to determine the degree to which they measure sensitivity as defined by Ainsworth (Ainsworth Maternal Sensitivity Scales (AMSS); 1969). The measures were administered to the same sample of 50 diversely functional European American mother-infant dyads, including the scales and subscales of the measures that were deemed to measure sensitivity for analysis. EAS, NCAFS, and MBQS were significant predictors of Ainsworths sensitivity (AMSS); however, the role of socio-economic status varied across the measures. The findings suggest that three of the most frequently used observational maternal sensitivity measures may not measure identical features of sensitivity and should perhaps not be used interchangeably

    Evolution of the Pancaking Effect in a LCDM Cosmology

    Full text link
    We explore the evolution of the large-scale anisotropy in the velocity field caused by the gravitational pancaking effect assuming a LCDM universe. The Millennium Run halo catalogs at four different redshifts, z=0, 0.5, 1 and z=2 are analyzed to find that the pancaking effect starts to intervene the hierarchical structure formation at redshift z=2 when a characteristic pancake scale is around 3 Mpc/h. It is also clearly shown how the degree and scale of the pancaking effect changes with time. An analytic model based on the Zel'dovich approximation is presented to explain quantitatively the evolution of the velocity-pancake alignment. A cosmological implication of our finding and a possibility of detecting a signal in real universe are discussed.Comment: accepted by ApJ, 21 pages, 6 figures, discussion and error analysis improve

    Thrombocytopenia with tedizolid and linezolid

    Get PDF
    Objective: Though thrombocytopenia is a known adverse effect with linezolid, the first-in class oxazolidinone antibiotic, some have suggested a lower risk of thrombocytopenia with tedizolid, the second-in-class oxazolidinone antibiotic. We sought to evaluate adverse event reports for thrombocytopenia with tedizolid and linezolid from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: To assess the period since tedizolid approval, we included initial FAERS reports from July 2014 through December 2016. To evaluate historical rates with linezolid prior to tedizolid approval, we assessed AERSMine data from January 2004 through June 2014. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) and proportional reporting ratios (PRR) were calculated. Results: Of all the reported events, 0.074% (n=1,468) were thrombocytopenia. Linezolid represented 0.02% (n=408) of all events, and tedizolid represented 0.002% (n=41). The ROR for thrombocytopenia with linezolid was 37.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 20.78-69.17) and with tedizolid was 34.0 (95% CI 4.67- 247.30). The PRR for thrombocytopenia with linezolid was 36.9 (95% CI 20.56-66.28) and with tedizolid was 33.2 (95% CI 4.79- 230.10). From 2004 through June 2014, the linezolid ROR was 12.1 (95% CI 11.19-12.96) and PRR was 11.1 (95% CI 10.38-11.87). Conclusion: We observed a significantly increased risk of thrombocytopenia of similar magnitude with both linezolid and tedizolid. Thrombocytopenia with tedizolid should be assessed with real-world comparative safety studies as more patients are treated with tedizolid

    Verbal Compounding in Korean

    Get PDF
    Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Semantic Typology and Semantic Universals (1993

    Magnetic phase diagram of doped CMR manganites

    Full text link
    The magnetic phase diagram of the colossal magnetoresistance (CMR) manganites is determined based on the Hamiltonian incorporating the double-exchange (DE) interaction between degenerate Mn ege_g orbitals and the antiferromagnetic (AF) superexchange interaction between Mn t2gt_{2g} spins. We have employed the rigorous quantum mechanical formalism and obtained the finite temperature phase diagram which describes well the commonly observed features in CMR manganites. We have also shown that the CE-type AF structure cannot be stabilized at xx=0.5 in this model.Comment: 2 pages, 1 figure; Transport and Thermal Properties of Advanced Materials(Aug. 2002; Hiroshima, Japan
    corecore