10 research outputs found
Additional file 1 of GTSE1 promotes nasopharyngeal carcinoma proliferation and angiogenesis by upregulating STMN1
Supplementary Material
Magnitude and dominance of resistance to Cry1Ac in <i>H. armigera</i> associated with cadherin resistance alleles: <i>r</i><sub>15</sub> in the cytoplasmic domain and <i>r</i><sub>1</sub> in the extracellular region.
a<p>Concentration killing 50% of larvae and 95% fiducial limits (µg Cry1Ac per cm<sup>2</sup> diet).</p>b<p>Resistance ratio = LC<sub>50</sub> of a strain or F<sub>1</sub> progeny from a cross divided by LC<sub>50</sub> of the susceptible SCD strain.</p>c<p>Survival at the diagnostic concentration (1 µg Cry1Ac per cm<sup>2</sup> diet), n = 48.</p>d<p><i>h</i> ranges from 0 for completely susceptible to 1 for completely dominant.</p>e<p><i>h</i> calculated from LC<sub>50</sub> values <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0053418#pone.0053418-Liu1" target="_blank">[34]</a>.</p>f<p><i>h</i> calculated from survival at the diagnostic concentration <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0053418#pone.0053418-Liu1" target="_blank">[34]</a>.</p>g<p><i>h</i> is calculated only for F<sub>1</sub> progeny from crosses between resistant and susceptible strains.</p>h<p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0053418#s2" target="_blank">Results</a> pooled from the two reciprocal crosses.</p
Genetic linkage between the cytoplasmic domain mutant of <i>HaCad</i> (<i>r</i><sub>15</sub>) and resistance to Cry1Ac in the XJ-r15 strain of <i>H. armigera</i>.
<p>We crossed a female (<i>ss</i>) from the susceptible SCD strain with a male from the resistant XJ-r15 strain (<i>r</i><sub>15</sub><i>r</i><sub>15</sub>) to produce the F<sub>1</sub> family (<i>r</i><sub>15</sub><i>s</i>). Next we crossed an F<sub>1</sub> male (<i>r</i><sub>15</sub><i>s</i>) with a susceptible SCD female (<i>ss</i>) to produce a backcross family from which larvae were placed on untreated diet (control) or diet treated with either 0.3 or 0.5 µg Cry1Ac per cm<sup>2</sup>. After 5 days, all survivors were transferred to untreated diet, reared to the final instar, and genotyped. The frequency of heterozygotes (<i>r</i><sub>15</sub><i>s</i>) relative to susceptible homozygotes (<i>ss</i>) was significantly higher for survivors on treated diet (68∶5) than for survivors on untreated diet (27∶23) (Fisher's exact test, P<0.0001).</p
Cry1Ac binding to Sf9 cells transfected with four alleles of <i>HaCad</i>.
<p><i>s</i>: susceptible allele. <i>r</i><sub>15</sub>: resistant allele, encoding cadherin with a 55 amino acid deletion in the cytoplasmic domain (C). <i>s</i>/<i>r</i><sub>15</sub>: chimeric allele with C from <i>r</i><sub>15</sub> and the other components from <i>s</i>. <i>r</i><sub>15</sub>/<i>s</i>: complementary chimeric allele with C from <i>s</i> and the other components from <i>r</i><sub>15</sub>. Cells were treated with 10 nM Cry1Ac, then probed sequentially with anti-Cry1Ac antiserum (1∶100) and FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (1∶100). No Cry1Ac binding was detected in control cells that were either transfected with an empty bacmid (EB) or not transfected (Sf9).</p
Responses to Bt toxin Cry1Ac of <i>H. armigera</i> from a susceptible strain (SCD, blue), three resistant strains (red), and the F<sub>1</sub> progeny from crosses between each resistant strain and the susceptible strain (purple).
<p>SCD-r1: resistant strain with allele <i>r<sub>1</sub></i> affecting the extracellular domain of HaCad. XJ-r15 and AY-r15: resistant strains (from Xiajin and Anyang, respectively) with allele <i>r</i><sub>15</sub> affecting the cytoplasmic domain of HaCad. Resistance ratio is the concentration killing 50% of larvae (LC<sub>50</sub>) of each strain or group of F<sub>1</sub> progeny divided by the LC<sub>50</sub> for the susceptible SCD strain. The black bars show the 95% fiducial limits for LC<sub>50</sub>.</p
Non-Recessive Bt Toxin Resistance Conferred by an Intracellular Cadherin Mutation in Field-Selected Populations of Cotton Bollworm
<div><p>Transgenic crops producing <em>Bacillus thuringiensis</em> (Bt) toxins have been planted widely to control insect pests, yet evolution of resistance by the pests can reduce the benefits of this approach. Recessive mutations in the extracellular domain of toxin-binding cadherin proteins that confer resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac by disrupting toxin binding have been reported previously in three major lepidopteran pests, including the cotton bollworm, <em>Helicoverpa armigera</em>. Here we report a novel allele from cotton bollworm with a deletion in the intracellular domain of cadherin that is genetically linked with non-recessive resistance to Cry1Ac. We discovered this allele in each of three field-selected populations we screened from northern China where Bt cotton producing Cry1Ac has been grown intensively. We expressed four types of cadherin alleles in heterologous cell cultures: susceptible, resistant with the intracellular domain mutation, and two complementary chimeric alleles with and without the mutation. Cells transfected with each of the four cadherin alleles bound Cry1Ac and were killed by Cry1Ac. However, relative to cells transfected with either the susceptible allele or the chimeric allele lacking the intracellular domain mutation, cells transfected with the resistant allele or the chimeric allele containing the intracellular domain mutation were less susceptible to Cry1Ac. These results suggest that the intracellular domain of cadherin is involved in post-binding events that affect toxicity of Cry1Ac. This evidence is consistent with the vital role of the intracellular region of cadherin proposed by the cell signaling model of the mode of action of Bt toxins. Considered together with previously reported data, the results suggest that both pore formation and cell signaling pathways contribute to the efficacy of Bt toxins.</p> </div
Cadherin protein of <i>H. armigera</i> encoded by <i>HaCad</i>.
<p><b>A.</b> Protein structure of HaCad predicted from cDNA with extracellular region (amino-terminal signal sequence [SIG], 11 cadherin repeats <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0053418#pone.0053418-Mendelsohn1" target="_blank">[1]</a>–<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0053418#pone.0053418-VanRensburg1" target="_blank">[11]</a>, membrane proximal region [MPR]), transmembrane region (TM), and cytoplasmic domain (C). <b>B.</b> Genomic DNA sequence of <i>HaCad</i>. Resistance allele <i>r<sub>1</sub></i> has a stop codon at 428G in cadherin repeat 3 caused by a genomic DNA deletion of ca. 10 kb <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0053418#pone.0053418-Yang2" target="_blank">[36]</a>. HaCad encoded by resistance allele <i>r</i><sub>15</sub> lacks 55 amino acids in the cytoplasmic domain caused by a 165 bp deletion in exon 32. We found three genomic DNA variants of <i>r</i><sub>15</sub> that cause loss of exon 32, one from each of three field populations: 1459 bp insertion from Xiajin, 92 bp deletion from Anyang, and >5000 bp insertion from Anci.</p
Mortality of Sf9 cells exposed to Cry1Ac.
<p>Sf9 cells were transfected with one of four alleles of <i>HaCad</i> (<i>s</i>, <i>r</i><sub>15</sub>, <i>r</i><sub>15</sub><i>/s</i>, and <i>s/r</i><sub>15</sub>; see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0053418#pone-0053418-g004" target="_blank">Figures 4</a> and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0053418#pone.0053418.s002" target="_blank">S2</a> for details) or an empty bacmid (EB), or were not transfected (NT). For cells transfected with alleles of <i>HaCad</i>, LC<sub>50</sub> values (95% FL) were significantly higher for alleles with the cytoplasmic domain of <i>r</i><sub>15</sub> (<i>r</i><sub>15</sub>: 85 [71–110] and <i>s/r</i><sub>15</sub>: 82 [68–100]) than for alleles with the cytoplasmic domain of <i>s</i> (<i>s</i>: 38 [31–46] or <i>r</i><sub>15</sub><i>/s</i>: 38 [31–45]). LC<sub>50</sub> values did not differ significantly between Sf9 cells transfected with alleles of <i>HaCad</i> that had the same cytoplasmic domain (<i>r</i><sub>15</sub> and <i>s/r</i><sub>15</sub>; <i>s</i> and <i>r</i><sub>15</sub><i>/s</i>).</p
Cellulose Nanofiber/Carbon Nanotube@Polypyrrole-Silver Nanowires Composite Films with a Multilayer Double Conductive Structure for High-Efficiency Electromagnetic Interference Shielding and Infrared Stealth
Fiber-based
conductive films show great potential for use in electromagnetic
interference shielding (EMI). However, it remains a challenge to meet
the multifunctional requirements of ultrathin materials, such as simultaneous
infrared stealth and outdoor stability. Here, this work prepared multilayer
composite membranes composed of cellulose nanofiber layer (CNF), CNF/carbon
nanotube@polypyrrole layer, and CNF/silver nanowire (AgNWs) layer
in different sequences by a simple step-by-step vacuum filtration
strategy and named them F, P, and A, respectively. Compared with the
uniformly mixed film, the three-layer films have excellent shielding
effectiveness (SE), attributed to the double gradient conductive network
structure and loss of interfacial polarization. The P–F–A
film, in particular, has a unique blank sandwich layer that makes
the reflection and scattering paths of electromagnetic waves longer.
As a result, the EMI SE of the P–F–A film is 69.8 dB,
which is higher than those of F–P–A (64.06 dB) and F–A–P
(63.8 dB). In addition, this work constructed a superhydrophobic surface
by using 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecanethiol (PFDT) as the composite
membranes. Because of the extremely low infrared emissivity of AgNWs,
F–P–A and P–F–A films have excellent infrared
stealth capabilities, and their performances are not affected by bending
and abrasion, which can meet the requirements of multifunctions and
adapt to complex environments. Overall, the composite films designed
in this study have broad application prospects in flexible electronics
wearable products, radar stealth, aerospace, and other fields
Data for Table 4
Data of Bt toxin concentrations in cotton cultivars