4,529 research outputs found
Phase Difference Between the Electromagnetic and Strong Amplitudes for psi(2S) and J/psi Decays into Pairs of Pseudoscalar Mesons
Using the data for 24.5x10^6 psi(2S) produced in e^+e^- annihilations at
sqrt{s}=3686 MeV at the CESR-c e^+e^- collider and 8.6x10^6 J/psi produced in
the decay psi(2S)->pi^+pi^-J/psi, the branching fractions for psi(2S) and J/psi
decays to pairs of pseudoscalar mesons, pi^+pi^-, K^+K^-, and K_S K_L, have
been measured using the CLEO-c detector. We obtain branching fractions
Br(psi(2S)->pi^+pi^-)=(7.6+-2.5+-0.6)x10^-6,
Br(psi(2S)->K^+K^-)=(74.8+-2.3+-3.9)x10^-6, Br(psi(2S)->K_S
K_L)=(52.8+-2.5+-3.4)x10^-6, and Br(J/psi->pi^+pi^-)=(1.47+-0.13+-0.13)x10^-4,
Br(J/psi->K^+K^-)=(2.86+-0.09+-0.19)x10^-4, Br(J/psi+-K_S
K_L)=(2.62+-0.15+-0.14)x10^-4, where the first errors are statistical and the
second errors are systematic. The phase differences between the amplitudes for
electromagnetic and strong decays of psi(2S) and J/psi to 0^{-+} pseudoscalar
pairs are determined by a Monte Carlo method to be
\delta(psi(2S)_{PP}=(110.5^{+16.0}_{-9.5})^o and
\delta(J/psi)_{PP}=(73.5^{+5.0}_{-4.5})^o. The difference between the two is
\Delta\delta = \delta(psi(2S))_{PP}-\delta(J/psi)_{PP}
=(37.0^{+16.5}_{-10.5})^o.Comment: 16 pages, 5 figures, submitted to PR
âI Wonât Use the Term Dumbing It Down, but You Have to Take the Scientific Jargon Outâ: A Qualitative Study of Environmental Health Partnersâ Communication Practices and Needs
Effective research translation and science communication are necessary for successful implementation of water resources management initiatives. This entails active involvement of stakeholders through collaborative partnerships and knowledge-sharing practices. To follow up a recent study with the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)âfunded Center for Oceans and Human Health and Climate Change Interactions (OHHC2I) project investigators, the centerâs Community Engagement Core (CEC) documented center partnersâ science communication practices and needs to inform a collaborative training and improve investigator-partner bidirectional communication. Thirteen (13) individuals participated in 10 semi-structured qualitative interviews focused on their research translation needs, science communication and dissemination tactics, and interactions and experiences with scientists. Based on our findings, we recommend a collaborative, scientist-stakeholder training to include plain language development, dissemination tactics, communication evaluation, stakeholder and intended audience engagement, and strategies for effective transdisciplinary partnerships. This work contributes to the knowledge and understanding of stakeholder engagement practices specifically focused on science communication that can enhance relationship-building between academia and partners involved in environmental healthâfocused initiatives in the context of South Carolina but applicable elsewhere
Community-wide analysis of microbial genome sequence signatures
Genome signatures are used to identify and cluster sequences de novo from an acid biofilm microbial community metagenomic dataset, revealing information about the low-abundance community members
Phonon downconversion to suppress correlated errors in superconducting qubits
Quantum error correction can preserve quantum information in the presence of
local errors, but correlated errors are fatal. For superconducting qubits,
high-energy particle impacts from background radioactivity produce energetic
phonons that travel throughout the substrate and create excitations above the
superconducting ground state, known as quasiparticles, which can poison all
qubits on the chip. We use normal metal reservoirs on the chip back side to
downconvert phonons to low energies where they can no longer poison qubits. We
introduce a pump-probe scheme involving controlled injection of pair-breaking
phonons into the qubit chips. We examine quasiparticle poisoning on chips with
and without back-side metallization and demonstrate a reduction in the flux of
pair-breaking phonons by over a factor of 20. We use a Ramsey interferometer
scheme to simultaneously monitor quasiparticle parity on three qubits for each
chip and observe a two-order of magnitude reduction in correlated poisoning due
to background radiation.Comment: 24 pages, 17 figures, 5 table
Threshold effects in excited charmed baryon decays
Motivated by recent results on charmed baryons from CLEO and FOCUS, we
reexamine the couplings of the orbitally excited charmed baryons. Due to its
proximity to the [Sigma_c pi] threshold, the strong decays of the
Lambda_c(2593) are sensitive to finite width effects. This distorts the shape
of the invariant mass spectrum in Lambda_{c1}-> Lambda_c pi^+pi^- from a simple
Breit-Wigner resonance, which has implications for the experimental extraction
of the Lambda_c(2593) mass and couplings. We perform a fit to unpublished CLEO
data which gives M(Lambda_c(2593)) - M(Lambda_c) = 305.6 +- 0.3 MeV and h2^2 =
0.24^{+0.23}_{-0.11}, with h2 the Lambda_{c1}-> Sigma_c pi strong coupling in
the chiral Lagrangian. We also comment on the new orbitally excited states
recently observed by CLEO.Comment: 9 pages, 3 figure
Updated Measurement of the Strong Phase in D0 --> K+pi- Decay Using Quantum Correlations in e+e- --> D0 D0bar at CLEO
We analyze a sample of 3 million quantum-correlated D0 D0bar pairs from 818
pb^-1 of e+e- collision data collected with the CLEO-c detector at E_cm = 3.77
GeV, to give an updated measurement of \cos\delta and a first determination of
\sin\delta, where \delta is the relative strong phase between doubly
Cabibbo-suppressed D0 --> K+pi- and Cabibbo-favored D0bar --> K+pi- decay
amplitudes. With no inputs from other experiments, we find \cos\delta = 0.81
+0.22+0.07 -0.18-0.05, \sin\delta = -0.01 +- 0.41 +- 0.04, and |\delta| = 10
+28+13 -53-0 degrees. By including external measurements of mixing parameters,
we find alternative values of \cos\delta = 1.15 +0.19+0.00 -0.17-0.08,
\sin\delta = 0.56 +0.32+0.21 -0.31-0.20, and \delta = (18 +11-17) degrees. Our
results can be used to improve the world average uncertainty on the mixing
parameter y by approximately 10%.Comment: Minor revisions, version accepted by PR
Studies of the decays D^0 \rightarrow K_S^0K^-\pi^+ and D^0 \rightarrow K_S^0K^+\pi^-
The first measurements of the coherence factor R_{K_S^0K\pi} and the average
strong--phase difference \delta^{K_S^0K\pi} in D^0 \to K_S^0 K^\mp\pi^\pm
decays are reported. These parameters can be used to improve the determination
of the unitary triangle angle \gamma\ in B^- \rightarrow
decays, where is either a D^0 or a D^0-bar meson decaying to
the same final state, and also in studies of charm mixing. The measurements of
the coherence factor and strong-phase difference are made using
quantum-correlated, fully-reconstructed D^0D^0-bar pairs produced in e^+e^-
collisions at the \psi(3770) resonance. The measured values are R_{K_S^0K\pi} =
0.70 \pm 0.08 and \delta^{K_S^0K\pi} = (0.1 \pm 15.7) for an
unrestricted kinematic region and R_{K*K} = 0.94 \pm 0.12 and \delta^{K*K} =
(-16.6 \pm 18.4) for a region where the combined K_S^0 \pi^\pm
invariant mass is within 100 MeV/c^2 of the K^{*}(892)^\pm mass. These results
indicate a significant level of coherence in the decay. In addition, isobar
models are presented for the two decays, which show the dominance of the
K^*(892)^\pm resonance. The branching ratio {B}(D^0 \rightarrow
K_S^0K^+\pi^-)/{B}(D^0 \rightarrow K_S^0K^-\pi^+) is determined to be 0.592 \pm
0.044 (stat.) \pm 0.018 (syst.), which is more precise than previous
measurements.Comment: 38 pages. Version 3 updated to include the erratum information.
Errors corrected in Eqs (25), (26), 28). Fit results updated accordingly, and
external inputs updated to latest best known values. Typo corrected in Eq(3)-
no other consequence
Observation of the Dalitz Decay
Using 586 of collision data acquired at
GeV with the CLEO-c detector at the Cornell Electron Storage
Ring, we report the first observation of
with a significance of . The ratio of branching fractions
\calB(D_{s}^{*+} \to D_{s}^{+} e^{+} e^{-}) / \calB(D_{s}^{*+} \to D_{s}^{+}
\gamma) is measured to be , which is consistent with theoretical expectations
- âŠ