Rigid segmental cervical spine instrumentation is safe and efficacious in younger children

The utilization of cervical spine instrumentation in the young pediatric patient in not well reported. This study presents outcomes and complications of cervical spine instrumentation in patients who underwent cervical spine fusion surgery before age 10. Radiographic and clinical data were collected on all patients who underwent cervical spine surgery with instrumentation at a single institution between January 1, 2006 and March 21, 2015. Patients were ≤ years of age at the time of surgery with any cervical spine deformity/injury diagnosis. Patient demographics, details on cervical spine diagnosis, procedural data, imaging data, and post-operative follow up data were collected. Twenty children met the criteria and were included in the study with a mean follow-up of 10.6 months (3 mo to 2 years). Initial indication for cervical spine correction surgery included: deformity (7 cases), trauma (6 cases), instability (3 cases), stenosis (2 cases), rotary subluxation (1 case), and infection (1 case). Fifteen cases were treated with adult 3.5mm cervical spine instrumentation, 3 with wiring (1 sublaminar and 2 spinous process), and 2 with cannulated screws. Postop immobilization included 16 Halo fixation, 3 collars, and 1 CTO. Overall there were 5 complications related to the surgery. two patients who had wiring (1 sublaminar and 1 spinous process) developed a non-union and required revision surgery (1 with cannulated screws and 1 with 3.5mm segmental cervical spine instrumentation). One patient developed a postop infection that required incision and drainage. Five patients developed superficial pin infections for their Halo. Tow deformity patients experienced neurological complications that were likely unrelated to the cervical instrumentation. Conclusions: rigid segmental fixation can be safe and efficacious when used in pediatric cervical spine patients. Whether used with Halo or orthosis, patients experience minimal to no complications from the instrumentation and achieve successful fusion. Cervical spine wiring had a high risk of non-union requiring revision surgery. The incidence of wound infection was low with one in 20 cases

Clinically relevant biomechanical properties of three different fixation techniques of the upper instrumented vertebra in deformity surgery

OBJECTIVE Adjacent segment disease, junctional kyphosis/failure and pseudarthrosis can negatively impact the mid to long-term outcome in spinal deformity surgery. These complications might be influenced by upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) fixation techniques. In this study we analyze key biomechanical properties of three different UIV fixation techniques and define their ideal clinical use based on patient-specific risk profiles using a finite element analysis (FEA) model. METHODS A T9-pelvis posterior instrumented spinal fusion was assumed. Three different FEA models were created based on the UIV fixation technique: T9 pedicle screws (PS); T9 cortical bone screws (CBS); T9 transverse process hooks (TPH). The three FEA models consisted of T8-T10 bone and ligamentous anatomy derived from a CT scan of a healthy patient as well as spinal implants consisting of either pedicle screws, cortical bone screws or transverse process hooks as well as cobalt chromium rods. The FEA models were constrained at T10, axial load as assumed for a healthy 80 kg male during flexion, extension and lateral bending were applied. As surrogate markers for risk of proximal junctional kyphosis, proximal junctional failure, adjacent segment disease and pseudarthrosis the following biomechanical parameters were calculated: UIV range of motion (ROM); intradiscal stress at UIV/UIV + 1; UIV intravertebral stress and screw pull out forces. One-way ANOVA analyses have been performed to compare biomechanical outcome parameters between the three construct variants under investigation. RESULTS UIV-ROM was restricted during flexion/extension/lateral bending by: PS: 73%/80%/86%, CBS: 71%/81%/85% and TPH: 62%/76%/85%. Average intradiscal stress at UIV/UIV + 1 during flexion/extension/lateral bending was (Mega Pascal, MPa): PS 0.42/0.44/0.38, CBS 0.49/0.4/0.44, TPH 0.66/0.51/0.58; average intravertebral stress of the UIV superior endplate during flexion/extension/lateral bending was (MPa): PS 2.23/2.12/2.21, CBS 1.87/1.98/1.8, TPH 1.67/0.98/1.53. Screw pull-out forces (N) at UIV during flexion/extension/lateral bending were: PS 476/320/375, CBS 444/245/308. Statistically significant differences were found for intradiscal stress as well as vertebral body average stress (p = 0.02 and p = 0.02). CONCLUSION Different UIV fixation techniques carry different biomechanical properties. Pedicle screw fixation is the most rigid, leading to the highest UIV stress and UIV screw pull out forces. Cortical bones screw fixation is similarly rigid; however, UIV stress and UIV screw pull out is significantly lower. Transverse process hook fixation is the least rigid, with the lowest UIV stress, however highest intradiscal stress at UIV/UIV + 1. Thus, these biomechanical differences may help select optimal UIV fixation techniques according to patient specific risk factors

When to Perform Fusion Short of the Pelvis in Patients with Cerebral Palsy?

Background:. Patients with scoliosis secondary to cerebral palsy (CP) are often treated with posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with or without pelvic fixation. We sought to establish criteria to guide the decision of whether or not to perform fusion “short of the pelvis” in this population, and to assess differences in outcomes. Methods:. Using 2 prospective databases, we analyzed 87 pediatric patients who underwent PSF short of the pelvis from 2008 to 2015 to treat CP-related scoliosis and who had ≥2 years of follow-up. Preoperative radiographic and clinical variables were analyzed for associations with unsatisfactory correction (defined as pelvic obliquity of ≥10°, distal implant dislodgement, and/or reoperation for increasing deformity at 2- or 5-year follow-up). Continuous variables were dichotomized using the Youden index, and a multivariable model of predictors of unsatisfactory correction was created using backward stepwise selection. Finally, radiographic, health-related quality-of-life, and clinical outcomes of patients with fusion short of the pelvis who had neither of the 2 factors associated with unsatisfactory outcomes were compared with those of 2 matched-control groups. Results:. Deformity correction was unsatisfactory in 29 of 87 patients with fusion short of the pelvis. The final model included preoperative pelvic obliquity of ≥17° (odds ratio [OR], 6.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3 to 19.7; p < 0.01) and dependent sitting status (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 9.9; p = 0.04) as predictors of unsatisfactory correction. The predicted probability of unsatisfactory correction increased from 10% when neither of these factors was present to a predicated probability of 27% to 44% when 1 was present and to 72% when both were present. Among matched patients with these factors who had fusion to the pelvis, there was no association with unsatisfactory correction. Patients with independent sitting status and pelvic obliquity of <17° who had fusion short of the pelvis had significantly lower blood loss and hospital length of stay, and better 2-year health-related quality-of-life scores compared with matched controls with fusion to the pelvis. Conclusions:. In patients with scoliosis secondary to CP, pelvic obliquity of <17° and independent sitting status are associated with a low risk of unsatisfactory correction and better 2-year outcomes when fusion short of the pelvis is performed. These may be used as preoperative criteria to guide the decision of whether to perform fusion short of the pelvis in patients with CP. Level of Evidence:. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

Implant Complications After Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for Early Onset Scoliosis: A Multicenter Retrospective Review

Background:Traditional growing rods have a reported wound and implant complication rate as high as 58%. It is unclear whether the use of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) will affect this rate. This study was performed to characterize surgical complications following MCGR in early onset scoliosis.Methods:A multicenter retrospective review of MCGR cases was performed. Inclusion criteria were: (1) diagnosis of early onset scoliosis of any etiology; (2) 10 years and younger at time of index surgery; (3) preoperative major curve size >30 degrees; (4) preoperative thoracic spine height 6 mo). Distraction technique and interval of distraction was surgeon preference without standardization across sites.Results:Fifty-four MCGR patients met inclusion criteria. There were 30 primary and 24 conversion procedures. Mean age at initial surgery was 7.3 years (range, 2.4 to 11 y), and mean duration of follow-up 19.4 months. Twenty-one (38.8%) of 54 patients had at least 1 complication. Fifteen (27.8%) had at least 1 revision surgery. Six (11.1%) had broken rods (2 to 4.5 and 4 to 5.5 mm rods); two 5.5 mm rods failed early (4 mo) and 4 late (mean=14.5 mo). Six (11.1%) patients experienced 1 episode of lack or loss of lengthening, of which 4 patients subsequently lengthened. Seven patients (13.0%) had either proximal or distal fixation-related complication at average of 8.4 months. Two patients (3.7%) had infections requiring incision and drainage; 1 early (2 wk) with wound drainage and 1 late (8 mo). The late case required removal of one of the dual rods.Conclusions:This study shows that compared with traditional growing rods, MCGR has a lower infection rate (3.7% vs. 11.1%). MCGR does not appear to prevent common implant-related complications such as rod or foundation failure. The long-term implication remains to be determined.Level of Evidence:Level IV

Thoracic Curve Correction Ratio: An Objective Measure to Guide against Overcorrection of a Main Thoracic Curve in the Setting of a Structural Proximal Thoracic Curve

Purpose: The correction of double thoracic (Lenke 2) curves has been associated with higher rates of postoperative shoulder imbalance that may compromise long-term outcomes following spinal deformity correction. A number of methods have been proposed to mitigate this risk, though no accepted standard measurement exists. The purpose of this study is to validate a novel quantitative method of determining the relative curve correction magnitude in double thoracic curves. Methods: Retrospective data from a multi-center database of patients undergoing surgical correction of left-proximal thoracic, right-main thoracic Lenke 2 curves were analyzed. A novel measurement tool, the Thoracic Curve Correction Ratio (TCCR), was applied for the purposes of validation against historical data. Results: A total of 305 patients with complete two-year follow-up data were included. The TCCR, or the ratio of postoperative percent correction of the thoracic curves divided by the ratio of the preoperative curve magnitudes, displayed a significant negative correlation (Pearson R = −0.66; p < 0.001) with T1 tilt at two years postoperatively. Conclusions: The TCCR could be added as an important factor in the preoperative planning process and intraoperative assessment in order to reduce postoperative T1 tilt. While T1 tilt remains an imperfect surrogate measure for clinical shoulder balance, it serves as one of many potential measures that the surgeon may evaluate quantitatively and radiographically