Analysis Efficiency Marketing System of Fresh Layang Fish (Decapterus Russeli) on Pelabuhan Fish Auction Place in Tegal City

Marketing is an important aspect in running fishing business because it is an economic activity that influences the fluctuation of fishermen\u27s income. The production can be useless if the price is low, thus, marketing has to be good and efficient. This research is about the efficiency of the marketing system of fresh fish layang (Decapterus russeli) in the fish auction place. Specifically, this research is to know : 1) the marketing system of fresh fish layang in Tegal City. 2) the marketing margin of fresh fish layang in Tegal City. 3) the distribution flow of fresh fish layang in Tegal City. 4) the reason fishermen sell their products in the Fish Auction Place. The method use in this research is descriptive analysis method, The registration data and literature study. Based on the analysis, it is known that the marketing system of fresh in the Fish Auction Place, seen from the marketing cost calculation, purchasing price, selling price and profit is < 1, which means efficient. And if seen from the marketing margin, the most efficient flow is channel 4 (the 4th channel). Meanwhile, the reason why fishermen sell their Fish Auction Place is because of the guarantee that their product will be sold. Fish is a product that is easily broken and rotten. Therefore, the guarantee that the product will be sold, can minimize loss risk for fisherman

The accuracy of the English-to-Chinese translation for the Chinese emotion vocabulary being measured with a Kappa agreement coefficient of 0.6218 between two referees, indicating acceptable inter-rater agreement.

<p>The accuracy of the English-to-Chinese translation for the Chinese emotion vocabulary being measured with a Kappa agreement coefficient of 0.6218 between two referees, indicating acceptable inter-rater agreement.</p

Percentage of words in each emotion category understood by participants in each age band.

<p>Percentage of words in each emotion category understood by participants in each age band.</p

Percentage of words in each emotion category understood by at least 75% of all children in each age band.

<p>Percentage of words in each emotion category understood by at least 75% of all children in each age band.</p

Children’s understanding of positive, negative, and neutral emotion words in each age band.

<p>Error bars correspond to the standard deviation. * and *** denote the significant difference of emotion words understanding between two neighboring age bands at the 0.05 level and 0.001 level, respectively.</p

Emotion categories and the total number of words in each category in Chinese emotion vocabulary.

<p>Emotion categories and the total number of words in each category in Chinese emotion vocabulary.</p

Cross-cultural comparison of the development of EWC (evaluated by the number of emotion words understood).

<p>It was verified that: i) EWC of children in the UK developed better than that in the China in the early childhood period (ages 4–6 years old) but worse in the middle childhood (ages 7–10 years old); and ii) there is no significant difference between EWC of children in the UK and that in the China in the late childhood (ages 11–12 years old).</p

Effects of edaravone on Nrf2 target gene expression in primary HCEpiCs.

<p>Cells were treated with edaravone for 24 h. Gene expression was determined by real-time PCR analysis. (A) HO-1 mRNA; (B) GPx-1 mRNA; (C) GCLC mRNA; (D) GSH levels (ANOVA:*, P<0.001 vs. non-treatment control; #, P<0.001 vs. 450 mOsM treated group).</p

Effects of edaravone on the expression of Nrf2.

<p>Levels of Nrf2 in whole cell extracts were determined by the western blot analysis (ANOVA:*, P<0.001 vs. non-treatment control; #, P<0.001 vs. 450 mOsM treated group).</p

Effects of edaravone on cleaved caspase-3 as measured by western blot analysis.

<p>Edaravone treatment inhibits the increase in cleaved caspase-3 induced by hyperosmotic exposure (400–450 mOsM) (ANOVA:*, P<0.001 vs. non-treatment control; #, P<0.001 vs. 450 mOsM treated group).</p