6 research outputs found

    Willingness to pay towards a public good: how does a refund option affect stated values?

    No full text
    Mandatory taxes and/or voluntary contributions are commonly adopted as the payment vehicle when eliciting willingness to pay (WTP) in environmental valuation studies. While mandatory taxes may arouse negative feelings, voluntary contributions may lead to strategic behaviour (over bidding) or free riding (under bidding). In this paper, we explore an alternative payment vehicle which avoids the draconian undertones associated with taxes and may be more incentive compatible than a voluntary contribution – a tax that incorporates a refund option. The template for such a payment vehicle is the value added tax charged to tourists in Ireland, but which can be reclaimed on exiting the country. In the context of raising public funds to support the conservation of rural countryside landscape, a comparison is made between the elicited WTP via a mandatory tax and that elicited via the alternative payment method incorporating a refund option. While we observe similar participation rates between the two payment methods, the refund option reveals a higher stated WTP

    Is there agreement between beneficiaries on who should bear the costs of conserving farm landscapes?

    No full text
    In recent years market based incentives have been regarded as a potential solution for addressing market failure related to environmental externalities. Determining the optimal payment schedule to facilitate such market mechanism typically involves a valuation exercise to capture the static benefits received by beneficiary groups from the public good. In this study we augment the valuation estimates with a notion of 'fair share' by assessing opinions of two beneficiary groups (tourists and Bed and Breakfast owners) regarding an acceptable division of the burden of financing the public good. We find a significant difference in views. Tourists believe that their accommodation providers should contribute almost twice the amount that they themselves are willing to pay. On the contrary, a majority of Bed and Breakfast owners surveyed were against burdening tourists with any additional payments

    Can traders help farmers transition towards more sustainable maize based farming systems? Evidence from the Lao-Vietnamese border

    Full text link
    Intensive maize cultivation in the uplands of North-west Vietnam has resulted in soil erosion leading to reduced maize yields along with negative impacts downstream. Despite the introduction of sustainable agricultural technologies over many years, adoption rates are low mostly due to their incompatibility with existing farming systems and lack of secure markets for alternative crops. In addition, the temporary nature of development programmes and limited capacity of government extension systems have resulted in limited spread of technology, and where they have been introduced, unable to secure long-lasting commitments from farmers. In this study, we explore an alternative model involving maize value chain actors for attaining more durable transition towards sustainable maize farming systems. We find maize traders operating at lower levels of the value chain with active engagement with the farming community to be best suited for engaging in technology dissemination. While their involvement may require additional incentives and oversight from the government it is imperative that support for commercialization through promising market links are established to achieve a more meaningful shift towards sustainable farming methods
    corecore