80 research outputs found

    Planetesimal Formation with Particle Feedback

    Full text link
    Proposed mechanisms for the formation of km-sized solid planetesimals face long-standing difficulties. Robust sticking mechanisms that would produce planetesimals by coagulation alone remain elusive. The gravitational collapse of smaller solids into planetesimals is opposed by stirring from turbulent gas. This proceeding describes recent works showing that "particle feedback," the back-reaction of drag forces on the gas in protoplanetary disks, promotes particle clumping as seeds for gravitational collapse. The idealized streaming instability demonstrates the basic ability of feedback to generate particle overdensities. More detailed numerical simulations show that the particle overdensities produced in turbulent flows trigger gravitational collapse to planetesimals. We discuss surprising aspects of this work, including the large (super-Ceres) mass of the collapsing bound cluster, and the finding that MHD turbulence aids gravitational collapse.Comment: 6 pages, to appear in ``Extreme Solar Systems'', D. Fischer, F. Rasio, S. Thorsett and A. Wolszczan (eds), ASP Conf. Ser., 200

    Structure and Evolution of Internally Heated Hot Jupiters

    Full text link
    Hot Jupiters receive strong stellar irradiation, producing equilibrium temperatures of 1000−2500 Kelvin1000 - 2500 \ \mathrm{Kelvin}. Incoming irradiation directly heats just their thin outer layer, down to pressures of $\sim 0.1 \ \mathrm{bars}.InstandardirradiatedevolutionmodelsofhotJupiters,predictedtransitradiiaretoosmall.Previousstudieshaveshownthatdeeperheating−−atasmallfractionoftheheatingratefromirradiation−−canexplainobservedradii.HerewepresentasuiteofevolutionmodelsforHD209458bwherewesystematicallyvaryboththedepthandintensityofinternalheating,withoutspecifyingtheuncertainheatingmechanism(s).Ourmodelsstartwithahot,highentropyplanetwhoseradiusdecreasesastheconvectiveinteriorcools.Theappliedheatingsuppressesthiscooling.Wefindthatveryshallowheating−−atpressuresof. In standard irradiated evolution models of hot Jupiters, predicted transit radii are too small. Previous studies have shown that deeper heating -- at a small fraction of the heating rate from irradiation -- can explain observed radii. Here we present a suite of evolution models for HD 209458b where we systematically vary both the depth and intensity of internal heating, without specifying the uncertain heating mechanism(s). Our models start with a hot, high entropy planet whose radius decreases as the convective interior cools. The applied heating suppresses this cooling. We find that very shallow heating -- at pressures of 1 - 10 \ \mathrm{bars}−−doesnotsignificantlysuppresscooling,unlessthetotalheatingrateis -- does not significantly suppress cooling, unless the total heating rate is \gtrsim 10\%oftheincidentstellarpower.Deeperheating,at of the incident stellar power. Deeper heating, at 100 \ \mathrm{bars},requiresheatingatonly, requires heating at only 1\%ofthestellarirradiationtoexplaintheobservedtransitradiusof of the stellar irradiation to explain the observed transit radius of 1.4 R_{\rm Jup}after5Gyrofcooling.Ingeneral,moreintenseanddeeperheatingresultsinlargerhotJupiterradii.Surprisingly,wefindthatheatdepositedat after 5 Gyr of cooling. In general, more intense and deeper heating results in larger hot Jupiter radii. Surprisingly, we find that heat deposited at 10^4 \ \mathrm{bars}−−whichisexteriorto -- which is exterior to \approx 99\%$ of the planet's mass -- suppresses planetary cooling as effectively as heating at the center. In summary, we find that relatively shallow heating is required to explain the radii of most hot Jupiters, provided that this heat is applied early and persists throughout their evolution.Comment: Accepted at ApJ, 14 pages, 10 figure

    On the Formation of Planetesimals via Secular Gravitational Instabilities with Turbulent Stirring

    Full text link
    We study the gravitational instability (GI) of small solids in a gas disk as a mechanism to form planetesimals. Dissipation from gas drag introduces secular GI, which proceeds even when standard GI criteria for a critical density or Toomre's QQ predict stability. We include the stabilizing effects of turbulent diffusion, which suppresses small scale GI. The radially wide rings that do collapse contain up to ∼0.1\sim 0.1 Earth masses of solids. Subsequent fragmentation of the ring (not modeled here) would produce a clan of chemically homogenous planetesimals. Particle radial drift time scales (and, to a lesser extent, disk lifetimes and sizes) restrict the viability of secular GI to disks with weak turbulent diffusion, characterized by α≲10−4\alpha \lesssim 10^{-4}. Thus midplane dead zones are a preferred environment. Large solids with radii ≳10\gtrsim 10 cm collapse most rapidly because they partially decouple from the gas disk. Smaller solids, even below ∼\sim mm-sizes could collapse if particle-driven turbulence is weakened by either localized pressure maxima or super-Solar metallicity. Comparison with simulations that include particle clumping by the streaming instability shows that our linear model underpredicts rapid, small scale gravitational collapse. Thus the inclusion of more detailed gas dynamics promotes the formation of planetesimals. We discuss relevant constraints from Solar System and accretion disk observations.Comment: Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal; 20 pages, 10 figure
    • …
    corecore