9 research outputs found
Predictions for p+Pb at 4.4A TeV to Test Initial State Nuclear Shadowing at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider
Collinear factorized perturbative QCD model predictions are compared for p+Pb
at 4.4A TeV to test nuclear shadowing of parton distribution at the Large
Hadron Collider (LHC). The nuclear modification factor (NMF),
R_{pPb}(y=0,p_T<20 GeV/c) = dn_{p Pb} /(N_{coll}(b)dn_{pp}), is computed with
electron-nucleus (e+A) global fit with different nuclear shadow distributions
and compared to fixed Q^2 shadow ansatz used in Monte Carlo Heavy Ion Jet
Interacting Generator (HIJING) type models. Due to rapid DGLAP reduction of
shadowing with increasing Q^2 used in e+A global fit, our results confirm that
no significant initial state suppression is expected (R_{pPb} (p_T) = 1 \pm
0.1) in the p_T range 5 to 20 GeV/ c. In contrast, the fixed Q^2 shadowing
models assumed in HIJING type models predict in the above p_T range a sizable
suppression, R_{pPb} (p_T) = 0.6-0.7 at mid-pseudorapidity that is similar to
the color glass condensate (CGC) model predictions. For central (N_{coll} = 12)
p+ Pb collisions and at forward pseudorapidity (\eta = 6) the HIJING type
models predict smaller values of nuclear modification factors (R_{pPb}(p_T))
than in minimum bias events at mid-pseudorapidity (\eta = 0). Observation of
R_{pPb}(p_T= 5-20 GeV/c) less than 0.6 for minimum bias p+A collisions would
pose a serious difficulty for separating initial from final state interactions
in Pb+Pb collisions at LHC energies.Comment: Revised version accepted for publication; Phys. Rev. C, in press, 16
pages, 4 figures, text modifications, added references, new figure 4, revtex
Recommended from our members
Organizational Discourse: Domains, Debates, and Directions
Interest in the analysis of organizational discourse has expanded rapidly over the last two decades. In this article, we reflect critically on organizational discourse analysis as an approach to the study of organizations and management, highlighting both its strengths and areas of challenge. We begin with an explanation of the nature of organizational discourse analysis and outline some of the more significant contributions made to date. We then discuss existing classifications of approaches to the study of organizational discourse and suggest that they fall into two main categories: classifications by level of analysis and classifications by type of method. We argue that both of these approaches are inherently problematic and present an alternative way to understand the varieties of approaches to the analysis of organizational discourse based on within domain and across domain characterizations. We conclude with a discussion of the challenges that remain in the development of organizational discourse as an area of study and point to some of the opportunities for important and unique contributions to our understanding of organizations and management that this family of methods brings. © 2012 Copyright Academy of Management
Sexual dimorphism in the energy content of weight change
BACKGROUND: The energy content of weight change is assumed to be sex- and age-neutral at 3500 kcal/pound or 32.2 MJ/kg. OBJECTIVES: As sexual dimorphism in body composition generally exists in mammals, the primary hypothesis advanced and tested was that the energy content of weight change differs between men and women. DESIGN: The energy content of 129 adult men and 287 women was measured by neutron activation analysis. Cross-sectional energy content prediction models were developed and then evaluated in two longitudinal samples: one that used the same methods in 26 obese women losing weight; and the other a compilation of 18 previously reported weight change-body composition studies. RESULTS: Multiple regression modeling identified weight, sex, age and height as total energy content predictor variables with significant sexxweight (P < 0.001) and agexweight (P < 0.001) interactions; total model r2 and s.e.e. were 0.89 and 107.3 MJ, respectively. The model's predictive value was supported in both longitudinal evaluation samples. Model calculations using characteristics of representative adults gaining or losing weight suggested that the energy content of weight change in women (∼ 30.1-32.2 MJ/kg) is near to the classical value of 32.2 MJ/kg and that in men the value is substantially lower, ∼ 21.8-23.8 MJ/kg. The predicted energy content of weight change increases by about 10% in older (age ∼ 70 y) vs younger (∼ 35 y) men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual dimorphism and age-dependency appears to exist in the estimated energy content of weight change and these observations have important clinical and research implications