Role of tumor location on high-grade serous ovarian cancer prognosis

Objectives: Ovarian cancer is associated with the highest mortality of gynecologic cancers. Epidemiological and genetic factors of ovarian cancer development are clearly defined but prognostic factors have not been adequately identified. Right and left ovarian cancers seem to act different behaviors at high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) prognosis. The aim of this study is to explain this prognostic role of its sidedness. The aim of this study is to explain this prognostic role of its sidedness. Material and methods: We reviewed 160 consecutive patients with Figo stage 1-3 HGSOCs and undergone surgery at two high-volume hospitals. Prognostic effects of primary tumor location onset were evaluated in terms of 5-year disease free survival and overall survival rate. Results: One hundred-sixty patients with ovarian cancer records were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, that demonstrated a significant difference in the 5-year disease-free survival rates between right and left-sided cancers for all stages (44.6% vs 78.5%, p < 0.001). Also, there was significant difference in the 5-year overall survival rates between the two groups (71.1% vs 91.9%, p = 0.020). Conclusions: Tumor location within the HGSOC seems to be a compelling prognostic factor ovarian cancer. Further prospective studies are needed in order to support our hypothesis

Evaluation of prognostic factors and treatment in advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma: report of a multi-institutional experience of anatolian Society of medical oncology (ASMO)

WOS: 000388782200027PubMed ID: 27837629Purpose: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare tumor of the gastrointestinal system with poor prognosis. Since these are rarely encountered tumors, there are limited numbers of studies investigating systemic treatment in advanced SBA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors and systemic treatments in patients with advance SBA. Methods: Seventy-one patients from 18 Centers with advanced SBA were included in the study. Fifty-six patients received one of the four different chemotherapy regimens as first-line therapy and 15 patients were treated with best supportive care (BSC). Results: Of the 71 patients, 42 (59%) were male and 29 (41%) female with a median age of 56 years. Median follow-up duration was 14.3 months. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7 and 13 months, respectively (N=71). In patients treated with FOLFOX (N=18), FOLFIRI (N=11), cisplatin-5-fluoroura-cil/5-FU (N=17) and gemcitabine alone (N=10), median PFS was 7, 8, 8 and 5 months, respectively, while median OS was 15, 16, 15 and 11 months, respectively. No significant differences between chemotherapy groups were noticed in terms of PFS and OS. Univariate analysis revealed that chemotherapy administration, de novo metastatic disease, ECOG PS 0 and 1, and overall response to therapy were significantly related to improved outcome. Only overall response to treatment was found to be significantly prognostic in multivariate analysis (p = 0.001). Conclusions: In this study, overall response to chemotherapy emerged as the single significant prognostic factor for advanced SBAs. Platin and irinotecan based regimens achieved similar survival outcomes in advanced SBA patients

Real-world treatment outcomes from nationwide Onco-colon Turkey registry in RAS wild-type patients treated with biologics second-line mCRC

...Amge

Real-world treatment outcomes from nationwide ONCO-colon Turkey registry in RAS wild-type patients treated with biologics first-line metastatic colorectal cancer

Background: Efficacy of anti-angiogenic and anti-EGFR agents has been demonstrated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Real-world evidence is especially important to detect the findings of patients outside of clinical trials. It complements together with clinical trials. However, there are a few studies that evaluated these treatments with biologics in the real-world setting. Recognizing the change that has occurred over the years will also shed light on future approaches. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the real-world data of patients with RAS-wild type mCRC. Methods: Medical records from 28 centers were collected for patients diagnosed with RAS wild-type mCRC between January 2016 and April 2019 and were included into the study. Histopathological, molecular and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded. The treatment duration, response rate, progression-free survival and safety results were determined. Also, changes over the years were compared. Patients were compared according to the first-line biological treatments as anti-EGFR group (Group A and B) (panitumumab and cetuximab) and anti-VEGF group (group C).Amgen Ilac Tic Ltd Sti, Turke

Evaluation of prognostic factors and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection

WOS: 000408269300020PubMed ID: 27670893This is a multicenter study to assess the prognostic factors and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA). A total of 78 patients with SBA diagnosed with completely resected SBA were involved in the study. Only status of surgical margin was determined to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with SBA who underwent curative resection. Neither disease-free survival nor overall survival was found to be significantly improved by the adjuvant chemotherapy Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare tumor of the gastrointestinal system with poor prognosis. Because these are rarely encountered tumors, the aim of this multicenter study was evaluation of prognostic factors and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with curatively resected SBA. Materials and Methods: A total of 78 patients diagnosed with curatively resected SBA were involved in the retrospective study. Forty-eight patients received 1 of 3 different chemotherapy regimens, whereas 30 patients did not receive any adjuvant treatment. No adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy cohorts were matched (1: 1) by propensity scores based on the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy or the survival hazard from Cox modeling. Overall survival (OS) was compared with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: Median age of 78 patients with curatively resected SBA was 58, and 59% of these were men. According to TNM classification, 8 (10%) of the patients were at stage I, 26 (34%) were at stage II, and 44 (56%) were at stage III. Median follow-up duration was 29 months. Three-year median disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were 62.5% and 67.0%, respectively. In univariate analysis, presence of vascular invasion, perineural invasion, lymph node involvement, and presence of positive surgical margin were significant predictors of poor survival. Multivariate analysis showed that the only adverse prognostic factor independently related with OS was the presence of positive surgical margin (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-1.26; P = .01). Neither DFS nor OS was found to be significantly improved by the adjuvant chemotherapy in both matched and unmatched cohorts. Conclusions: Only status of surgical margin was determined to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with SBA who underwent curative resection

Surgical, pathological and clinical features of advanced collorectal cancers with metastasectomy. "Onco-Colon Turkey Registry" real-life data

Background: The contribution of metastasectomy to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with advanced stage colorectal cancer has been demonstrated in clinical trials. However, clinical trials may not represent the efficacy of treatment given to the whole population in daily practice, therefore evaluation of real-life data is needed. Methods: The demographic, pathological and clinical characteristics of 1064 RAS wild type pts were recorded in 28 centers in Turkey between January 2016 and March 2019 as part of the Onco-Colon Registry Program (NCT04757311). Metastasectomy was performed in 169 patients (15.9%). In this study, pts with and without metastasectomy were compared in terms of demographic, histopathological and clinical features and treatment results. Results: Median follow-up time was 24 months(mos) (1-74), median age was 59 years (30-81). 32.5% of the pts were women. The proportion of pts with primary right colon was determined to be 16.8%. Synchronous metastasis was detected in 76.3% of those who underwent metastasectomy. Isolated liver metastasectomy was performed in 85.8% of the pts. It has been shown that 21.1% of the pts have MSI-H and 23.3% have a mucinous component. Metastasectomy was performed after conversion therapy in 54.8% of pts. In the patient group who underwent metastasectomy after medical treatment, the median time between the beginning of treatment and metastasectomy was found to be 7 mos (2-34). When the patient characteristics were compared, no significant difference was found between the groups with and without metastasectomy (p > 0.05). The median PFS (mPFS) was 13.5 mos in the group that underwent metastasectomy and 9.9 mos in the group that was not performed (p < 0.0001; HR: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.51-0.77). The median OS (mOS) was 47.3 mos in the group that underwent metastasectomy and 24.3 mos in the group without metastasectomy (p < 0.0001; HR: 0.36 (95% CI: 0.27-0.48). Conclusions: The significant contribution of metastasectomy on mPFS and mOS was shown in this reallife data based trial, where no difference was found in terms of general participation characteristics. In daily practice, prolonged mPFS and mOS emerges as pts who are followed-up radiologically at regular intervals from the beginning and who are appropriate for surgery have the chance of metastasectomy

Efficacy and safety of folfiri plus aflibercept in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Real-life data from Turkish oncology group

Aims: The addition of aflibercept to the fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) previously treated with oxaliplatin. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line FOLFIRI and aflibercept combination in patients with metastatic CRC in real-life experience. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and thirty-three patients who treated with FOLFIRI and aflibercept in the second-line were included in the study. The clinical and pathological features of the patients were recorded retrospectively. Survival (overall and progression-free survival [PFS]), response rates, and safety data were analyzed. Results: The median age was 61. Majority of patients (87.5%) received first-line bevacizumab and 10.1% of patients received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. About 80% of patients had KRAS, 18.6% of patients had NRAS, and 6.4% of patients had BRAF mutations. The median OS was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-12.6) and the median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 5.5-6.5). About 4.6% of patients had complete response and 30.6% of patients had partial response as best tumor response. Grade 1-2 toxicities were seen in 33.4% of patients, while grade 3-4 toxicities were recorded in 27% of patients. Eight patients (2%) died due to treatment toxicity. Conclusions: Overall and PFS were similar in routine clinical practice compared to phase III pivotal VELOUR trial. However, response rates were found to be higher. It was observed that there were fewer adverse events compared to the VELOUR trial