1,558 research outputs found
Materiality and human cognition
In this paper, we examine the role of materiality in human cognition. We address issues such as the ways in which brain functions may change in response to interactions with material forms, the attributes of material forms that may cause change in brain functions, and the spans of time required for brain functions to reorganize when interacting with material forms. We then contrast thinking through materiality with thinking about it. We discuss these in terms of their evolutionary significance and history as attested by stone tools and writing, material forms whose interaction endowed our lineage with conceptual thought and meta-awareness of conceptual domains
A note on the authorship of Voltaireâs 'La FĂȘte de BĂ©lesbatâ
On 15 May 1760 Voltaire wrote to the historian and parlementaire Charles-Jean-François HĂ©nault: âSongez vous bien, mon illustre confrĂšre, que de tous ceux qui assistĂšrent Ă l'extrĂȘme onction que je donnai au curĂ© et Ă cette fĂȘte que vous embellĂźtes, il n'y a que vous et moi qui soyons en vie?â1 The nostalgic recollection of La FĂȘte de BĂ©lesbat, performed by and for madame de Prie's circle in the autumn of 1725, establishes a solidarity between the two survivors, and the term âconfrĂšresâ, often used between fellow acadĂ©miciens,2 (disingenuously) insists upon their similar literary status. The recent appearance of La FĂȘte de BĂ©lesbat in the ongoing edition of Voltaire's Complete Works prompts a re-examination of the play's authorship.3 Voltaire's precise role in the composition of the work is contested, notably by the editors of the Kehl edition (1785): âTous les vers, Ă beaucoup prĂšs, ne sont pas de M. de Voltaire, et ceux qui lui appartiennent sont faciles Ă distinguer.â4 Among twentieth-century scholars, the author of an essay on madame de Prie's cultural patronage challenges the unsubstantiated ease of this evaluation;5 RenĂ© Pomeau argues that it is indeed a collaborative work; Louis Moland states that Voltaire wrote the piece in its entirety;6 and admitting the impossibility of ascertaining whether or not the FĂȘte is a collaborative work, Russell Goulbourne assumes in his recent study of Voltaire's comic theatre that it is âsolely Voltaire's workâ.7 A return to the archives clarifies the authorship of some of the play's 507 lines
Betsy Erkkila. The Whitman Revolution: Sex, Poetry, and Politics.
Review of Betsy Erkkila. The Whitman Revolution: Sex, Poetry, and Politics
Whitman\u27s Achievements in the Personal Style in Calamus
Responds to previous critics who have repeatedly emphasized the deeply personal nature of Whitman\u27s Calamus poems by arguing that Whitman achieved this personal quality by working with a considerable degree of artistic detachment and that it is . . . this very same detachment, operating perhaps at a more instinctive level, that enabled Whitman to produce a poetry that is most profoundly and convincingly confessional by virtue of its implicit admissions and explicit investigations of \u27the difficulties of the confessional poet.\u2
Weathering the Storm: Whitman and the Civil War
Uses a variety of sources including Memoranda During the War, Specimen Days, and Drum-Taps to examine Whitman\u27s responses to the weather during the Civil War, investigating how weather worked as a trope for Whitman and how weather carried meaning differently during the time of the Civil War than it does presently
âA Singing Walt from the Mowerâ: Dylan Thomas and the âWhitmanian [Re]turnâ in the Post-War Poetic Culture of the States
This essay explores the remarkable impact of Dylan Thomas\u27s readings on the poetic culture of the post-war USA. It argues that this contributed to the "Whitmanian turn" taken by that culture from that point onwards
- âŠ