5,226 research outputs found

    Syntactic Change in the Verbal System of Bumthang,a Tibeto-Burman Language of Bhutan

    Get PDF
    This thesis investigates the synchronic and diachronic relationship of the verbal suffix -na to the copula na in Bumthang, a Tibeto-Burman language of central Bhutan. I discuss the formal and functional properties of each to demonstrate that the suffix-na originates in the structural reanalysis of the copula na. Previous research has shown how copulas in Tibeto-Burman languages may come to differentially mark personal knowledge. This differential pattern has been termed ‘personal versus impersonal,’ ‘conjunct versus disjunct,’ and ‘egophoric versus non-egophoric,’ among other labels. In the case of Bumthang I show that as -na has been drawn into the verbal paradigm, it has brought with it the dimension of differential personal versus impersonal marking to a system that did not previously make that distinction. This has led to significant changes in the structure of the verbal paradigm. It is hoped that this thesis will contribute to an understanding of how personal versus impersonal splits may develop, and be reinforced by other paradigms in the language. This thesis also aims to contribute to the documentation of Bumthang

    Physical simulation for monocular 3D model based tracking

    Get PDF
    The problem of model-based object tracking in three dimensions is addressed. Most previous work on tracking assumes simple motion models, and consequently tracking typically fails in a variety of situations. Our insight is that incorporating physics models of object behaviour improves tracking performance in these cases. In particular it allows us to handle tracking in the face of rigid body interactions where there is also occlusion and fast object motion. We show how to incorporate rigid body physics simulation into a particle filter. We present two methods for this based on pose and force noise. The improvements are tested on four videos of a robot pushing an object, and results indicate that our approach performs considerably better than a plain particle filter tracker, with the force noise method producing the best results over the range of test videos

    Shrinkwrap Licenses: Consequences of Breaking the Seal

    Get PDF

    La rĂ©ceptivitĂ© aux technologies des Ă©tudiants en mĂ©decine et le rapport entre cette rĂ©ceptivitĂ© et leurs intĂ©rĂȘts envers certaines spĂ©cialitĂ©s

    Get PDF
    Background: Technology readiness (TR) is a construct which characterizes an individual’s propensity to utilize new technology. Despite increased technology use in healthcare, limited data exists on medical student TR and the relation of TR with specialty interest. This study assesses the TR of 2nd year medical students and its association with specialty interest. Methods: Respondents completed a survey assessing their most preferred specialty, specialty interests, and technology readiness using a 5-point Likert scale. Using Chi-square analysis, we examined the relation between demographics, TR, and specialty interest. Results: This study obtained a 45.7% (n = 53/116) response rate demonstrating that 79.2% (n = 42/53) of students were “technology ready.” Male students were more likely to be technology ready (95.2%, n = 20/21, vs 68.8%, n = 22/32, p = 0.02) when compared to female students. Technology ready students were associated with being more interested in “Technology-Focused” specialties compared to students who were not technology ready (88.5%, n = 23/26 vs 70.4%, n = 19/27, p = 0.104). Conclusions: As a cohort, most medical students were technology ready. It is inconclusive if technology ready students are more likely to be interested in technology-focused specialties due to the limited sample size of this study, although with an increased sample size, an improved understanding on technology readiness and its potential impact on student specialty interest may be obtained. Furthermore, knowledge of TR may aid in developing targeted technology-based education programs and in improving remedial approaches for students who are less comfortable with new technology.Contexte : La rĂ©ceptivitĂ© aux technologies (RT) renvoie Ă  la tendance qu’a un individu Ă  utiliser une nouvelle technologie. MalgrĂ© l’utilisation accrue des technologies dans le domaine des soins de santĂ©, il existe peu de donnĂ©es sur la RT des Ă©tudiants en mĂ©decine et sur la relation entre cette rĂ©ceptivitĂ© et leur intĂ©rĂȘt envers les diverses spĂ©cialitĂ©s. La prĂ©sente Ă©tude Ă©value la RT des Ă©tudiants en mĂ©decine de 2e annĂ©e et le rapport entre celle-ci et leur intĂ©rĂȘt envers certaines spĂ©cialitĂ©s. MĂ©thodes : Les rĂ©pondants au sondage ont Ă©tĂ© interrogĂ©s sur leur spĂ©cialitĂ© prĂ©fĂ©rĂ©e, sur leurs intĂ©rĂȘts envers les diverses spĂ©cialitĂ©s et sur leur rĂ©ceptivitĂ© aux technologies. Leurs rĂ©ponses ont Ă©tĂ© Ă©valuĂ©es Ă  l’aide d’une Ă©chelle de Likert Ă  5 points. En utilisant l’analyse du Chi carrĂ©, nous avons examinĂ© la relation entre la dĂ©mographie, la RT et les intĂ©rĂȘts de spĂ©cialitĂ©. RĂ©sultats : Cette Ă©tude a obtenu un taux de rĂ©ponse de 45,7 % (n = 53/116), montrant que 79,2 % (n = 42/53) des Ă©tudiants sont prĂȘts pour l’utilisation des technologies. Cette tendance est davantage prĂ©sente chez les Ă©tudiants de sexe masculin (95,2 %, n = 20/21, comparĂ© Ă  68,8 %, n = 22/32, p = 0,02 pour les Ă©tudiantes). Les Ă©tudiants qui sont rĂ©ceptifs aux technologies ont plus tendance que leurs homologues qui le sont moins Ă  s’intĂ©resser aux spĂ©cialitĂ©s « axĂ©es sur la technologie Â» (88,5 %, n = 23/26, comparĂ© Ă  70,4 %, n = 19/27, p = 0,104). Conclusions : La plupart des Ă©tudiants de la cohorte Ă©tudiĂ©e Ă©taient rĂ©ceptifs aux technologies. En raison de la taille limitĂ©e de l’échantillon de l’étude, on ne peut pas conclure que les Ă©tudiants qui sont rĂ©ceptifs aux technologies sont plus susceptibles de s’intĂ©resser aux spĂ©cialitĂ©s axĂ©es sur la technologie. Des recherches fondĂ©es sur un Ă©chantillon Ă©largi nous aideraient Ă  mieux comprendre la rĂ©ceptivitĂ© aux technologies et son impact potentiel sur les intĂ©rĂȘts des Ă©tudiants envers les diverses spĂ©cialitĂ©s. De surcroĂźt, ces connaissances peuvent contribuer Ă  l’élaboration de programmes d’enseignement axĂ©s sur la technologie et de mesures d’aide au profit des Ă©tudiants qui sont moins Ă  l’aise avec les nouvelles technologies
    • 

    corecore