Study of a Swiss dopa-responsive dystonia family with a deletion in GCH1: redefining DYT14 as DYT5.

OBJECTIVE: To report the study of a multigenerational Swiss family with dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD). METHODS: Clinical investigation was made of available family members, including historical and chart reviews. Subject examinations were video recorded. Genetic analysis included a genome-wide linkage study with microsatellite markers (STR), GTP cyclohydrolase I (GCH1) gene sequencing, and dosage analysis. RESULTS: We evaluated 32 individuals, of whom 6 were clinically diagnosed with DRD, with childhood-onset progressive foot dystonia, later generalizing, followed by parkinsonism in the two older patients. The response to levodopa was very good. Two additional patients had late onset dopa-responsive parkinsonism. Three other subjects had DRD symptoms on historical grounds. We found suggestive linkage to the previously reported DYT14 locus, which excluded GCH1. However, further study with more stringent criteria for disease status attribution showed linkage to a larger region, which included GCH1. No mutation was found in GCH1 by gene sequencing but dosage methods identified a novel heterozygous deletion of exons 3 to 6 of GCH1. The mutation was found in seven subjects. One of the patients with dystonia represented a phenocopy. CONCLUSIONS: This study rules out the previously reported DYT14 locus as a cause of disease, as a novel multiexonic deletion was identified in GCH1. This work highlights the necessity of an accurate clinical diagnosis in linkage studies as well as the need for appropriate allele frequencies, penetrance, and phenocopy estimates. Comprehensive sequencing and dosage analysis of known genes is recommended prior to genome-wide linkage analysis

Age at symptom onset and death and disease duration in genetic frontotemporal dementia : an international retrospective cohort study

Background: Frontotemporal dementia is a heterogenous neurodegenerative disorder, with about a third of cases being genetic. Most of this genetic component is accounted for by mutations in GRN, MAPT, and C9orf72. In this study, we aimed to complement previous phenotypic studies by doing an international study of age at symptom onset, age at death, and disease duration in individuals with mutations in GRN, MAPT, and C9orf72. Methods: In this international, retrospective cohort study, we collected data on age at symptom onset, age at death, and disease duration for patients with pathogenic mutations in the GRN and MAPT genes and pathological expansions in the C9orf72 gene through the Frontotemporal Dementia Prevention Initiative and from published papers. We used mixed effects models to explore differences in age at onset, age at death, and disease duration between genetic groups and individual mutations. We also assessed correlations between the age at onset and at death of each individual and the age at onset and at death of their parents and the mean age at onset and at death of their family members. Lastly, we used mixed effects models to investigate the extent to which variability in age at onset and at death could be accounted for by family membership and the specific mutation carried. Findings: Data were available from 3403 individuals from 1492 families: 1433 with C9orf72 expansions (755 families), 1179 with GRN mutations (483 families, 130 different mutations), and 791 with MAPT mutations (254 families, 67 different mutations). Mean age at symptom onset and at death was 49\ub75 years (SD 10\ub70; onset) and 58\ub75 years (11\ub73; death) in the MAPT group, 58\ub72 years (9\ub78; onset) and 65\ub73 years (10\ub79; death) in the C9orf72 group, and 61\ub73 years (8\ub78; onset) and 68\ub78 years (9\ub77; death) in the GRN group. Mean disease duration was 6\ub74 years (SD 4\ub79) in the C9orf72 group, 7\ub71 years (3\ub79) in the GRN group, and 9\ub73 years (6\ub74) in the MAPT group. Individual age at onset and at death was significantly correlated with both parental age at onset and at death and with mean family age at onset and at death in all three groups, with a stronger correlation observed in the MAPT group (r=0\ub745 between individual and parental age at onset, r=0\ub763 between individual and mean family age at onset, r=0\ub758 between individual and parental age at death, and r=0\ub769 between individual and mean family age at death) than in either the C9orf72 group (r=0\ub732 individual and parental age at onset, r=0\ub736 individual and mean family age at onset, r=0\ub738 individual and parental age at death, and r=0\ub740 individual and mean family age at death) or the GRN group (r=0\ub722 individual and parental age at onset, r=0\ub718 individual and mean family age at onset, r=0\ub722 individual and parental age at death, and r=0\ub732 individual and mean family age at death). Modelling showed that the variability in age at onset and at death in the MAPT group was explained partly by the specific mutation (48%, 95% CI 35\u201362, for age at onset; 61%, 47\u201373, for age at death), and even more by family membership (66%, 56\u201375, for age at onset; 74%, 65\u201382, for age at death). In the GRN group, only 2% (0\u201310) of the variability of age at onset and 9% (3\u201321) of that of age of death was explained by the specific mutation, whereas 14% (9\u201322) of the variability of age at onset and 20% (12\u201330) of that of age at death was explained by family membership. In the C9orf72 group, family membership explained 17% (11\u201326) of the variability of age at onset and 19% (12\u201329) of that of age at death. Interpretation: Our study showed that age at symptom onset and at death of people with genetic frontotemporal dementia is influenced by genetic group and, particularly for MAPT mutations, by the specific mutation carried and by family membership. Although estimation of age at onset will be an important factor in future pre-symptomatic therapeutic trials for all three genetic groups, our study suggests that data from other members of the family will be particularly helpful only for individuals with MAPT mutations. Further work in identifying both genetic and environmental factors that modify phenotype in all groups will be important to improve such estimates. Funding: UK Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, and Alzheimer's Society

The Neuropathology of Chromosome 17-linked Autosomal Dominant Parkinsonism-Dementia (Pallo-ponto-nigral Degeneration)

A group of similar autosomal dominant hereditary neurodegenerative disorders have been linked to chromosome 17 in thirteen kindreds. One of these disorders, known as pallido-ponto-nigral degeneration (PPND), is characterized by extensive degeneration of the globus pallidus and substantia nigra as well as accumulation of abnormally phosphorylated tau proteins. The authors now present comprehensive data on the cellular and molecular pathology of PPND, allowing its classification among chromosome 17-linked neurodegenerative disorders as well as its classification among sporadic and other familial tauopathics. First, we showed that PPND is characterized by abundant ballooned neurons in neocortical and subcortical regions as well as by tau-rich inclusions in the cytoplasm of neurons and oligodendroglia morphologically similar to those seen in corticobasal degeneration (CBD), but in a distribution pattern resembling progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Second, we demonstrated that antibodies to phosphorylation-independent (Alz50, 133, 304, Tau-2, T-46) as well as phosphorylation-dependent (AT8, PHF-6, 12E8, PHF-1, T3P, pS422) epitopes in human tau proteins stain these glial and neuronal inclusions as intensely as they stain CBD or PSP inclusions. Third, we probed PPND brain by Western blots using some of the same anti-tau antibodies to reveal 2 tau immunobands with molecular weights of 69 kD and 64 kD in gray and white matter extracts, as reported for both PSP and CBD. Finally, electron microscopy showed that these abnormal tau proteins formed flat twisted ribbons with a maximum diameter of 20 nanometers (nm) and a periodicity of about 200 nm, resembling those reported in CBD. Based on this, we conclude that PPND is a hereditary neurodegenerative disorder characterized by neuronal and glial tau-rich inclusions formed from aggregated filaments and hyperphosphorylated tau proteins and, hence, can be subcategorized into the tauopathy group of chromosome 17-linked neurodegenerative disorders. Further, since the morphologic and biochemical lesions of PPND overlap with those seen in sporadic CBD and PSP, we speculate that these disorders share common pathogonetic mechanisms

Genomic analyses of a large Swedish multi-incident kindred with autosomal dominant Parkinson’s disease with dementia

Background:The known genetic causes for Parkinson’s disease (PD) onlyexplain a small proportion of the familial aggregation of PD. Despiteintensive efforts by researchers internationally, identifying and confirmingadditional monogenic causes for PD has been difficult.Methods:We examined 16 members of a large family with multi-incidentPD and dementia. Eight members were examined by whole exome (WES)or whole genome sequencing. Rare variants co-segregating with the disease were evaluated based on their distribution in additional familymembers and known gene functions. WES data from 843 PD cases and 885controls were screened for the two most highly ranked candidate variantsand used for gene burden analysis.Results:Clinically, all affected family members had typical PD withcognitive decline. Two affected individuals showed typical PD neuropathology. Out of nine genetic variants identified, we highlighted two as goodcandidates for causing this family’s PD. However, co-segregation with PDwas imperfect and this study was complicated by the fact that somegenotyped family members showed mild motor symptoms of uncertaincause, or cognitive decline without apparent motor dysfunction. Geneburden analysis showed no difference between cases and controls in thefrequency of potentially deleterious variants in the top-candidate genes.Nonetheless, factors that could indicate an impact of either of the two topcandidate genetic variants were found as one of the variants was identifiedin one additional familial PD proband from the case series and geneticvariants in the other top-candidate gene had previously been associatedwith an increased risk for PD in humans.Conclusions: Our study was not able to determine a single high-impactvariant as the cause of PD with cognitive decline in the family despitedetailed clinical and genetic assessments, but we nominate two potentialcandidate variants. Reduced penetrance and phenocopies may complicategenomic studies of families with PD