Molecular analysis of Mycobacterium isolates from extrapulmonary specimens obtained from patients in Mexico

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Little information is available on the molecular epidemiology in Mexico of <it>Mycobacterium </it>species infecting extrapulmonary sites in humans. This study used molecular methods to determine the <it>Mycobacterium </it>species present in tissues and body fluids in specimens obtained from patients in Mexico with extrapulmonary disease.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Bacterial or tissue specimens from patients with clinical or histological diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis were studied. DNA extracts from 30 bacterial cultures grown in Löwenstein Jensen medium and 42 paraffin-embedded tissues were prepared. Bacteria were cultured from urine, cerebrospinal fluid, pericardial fluid, gastric aspirate, or synovial fluid samples. Tissues samples were from lymph nodes, skin, brain, vagina, and peritoneum. The DNA extracts were analyzed by PCR and by line probe assay (INNO-LiPA MYCOBACTERIA v2. Innogenetics NV, Gent, Belgium) in order to identify the <it>Mycobacterium </it>species present. DNA samples positive for <it>M. tuberculosis </it>complex were further analyzed by PCR and line probe assay (INNO-LiPA Rif.TB, Innogenetics NV, Gent, Belgium) to detect mutations in the <it>rpo</it>B gene associated with rifampicin resistance.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of the 72 DNA extracts, 26 (36.1%) and 23 (31.9%) tested positive for <it>Mycobacterium species </it>by PCR or line probe assay, respectively. In tissues, <it>M. tuberculosis </it>complex and <it>M. genus </it>were found in lymph nodes, and <it>M. genus </it>was found in brain and vagina specimens. In body fluids, <it>M. tuberculosis </it>complex was found in synovial fluid. <it>M. gordonae</it>, <it>M. smegmatis</it>, <it>M. kansasii</it>, <it>M. genus</it>, <it>M. fortuitum/M. peregrinum </it>complex and <it>M. tuberculosis </it>complex were found in urine. <it>M. chelonae/M. abscessus </it>was found in pericardial fluid and <it>M. kansasii </it>was found in gastric aspirate. Two of <it>M. tuberculosis </it>complex isolates were also PCR and LiPA positive for the <it>rpo</it>B gene. These two isolates were from lymph nodes and were sensitive to rifampicin.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>1) We describe the <it>Mycobacterium </it>species diversity in specimens derived from extrapulmonary sites in symptomatic patients in Mexico; 2) Nontuberculous mycobacteria were found in a considerable number of patients; 3) Genotypic rifampicin resistance in <it>M. tuberculosis </it>complex infections in lymph nodes was not found.</p

Evaluation of amplified rDNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) for the identification of cultured mycobacteria in a diagnostic laboratory

Background: The development of DNA amplification for the direct detection of M. tuberculosis from clinical samples has been a major goal of clinical microbiology during the last ten years. However, the limited sensitivity of most DNA amplification techniques restricts their use to smear positive samples. On the other hand, the development of automated liquid culture has increased the speed and sensitivity of cultivation of mycobacteria. We have opted to combine automated culture with rapid genotypic identification (ARDRA: amplified rDNA restriction analysis) for the detection resp. identification of all mycobacterial species at once, instead of attempting direct PCR based detection from clinical samples of M. tuberculosis only. Results: During 1998-2000 a total of approx. 3500 clinical samples was screened for the presence of M. tuberculosis. Of the 151 culture positive samples, 61 were M. tuberculosis culture positive. Of the 30 smear positive samples, 26 were M. tuberculosis positive. All but three of these 151 mycobacterial isolates could be identified with ARDRA within on average 36 hours. The three isolates that could not be identified belonged to rare species not yet included in our ARDRA fingerprint library or were isolates with an aberrant pattern. Conclusions: In our hands, automated culture in combination with ARDRA provides with accurate, practically applicable, wide range identification of mycobacterial species. The existing identification library covers most species, and can be easily updated when new species are studied or described. The drawback is that ARDRA is culture-dependent, since automated culture of M. tuberculosis takes on average 16.7 days (range 6 to 29 days). However, culture is needed after all to assess the antibiotic susceptibility of the strains