25 research outputs found
How Many Individuals Consider Themselves to Be Cell Biologists but Are Informed by the Journal That Their Work Is Not Cell Biology
Fussing About Fission: Defining Variety Among Mainstream and Exotic Apicomplexan Cell Division Modes
Cellular reproduction defines life, yet our textbook-level understanding of cell division is limited to a small number of model organisms centered around humans. The horizon on cell division variants is expanded here by advancing insights on the fascinating cell division modes found in the Apicomplexa, a key group of protozoan parasites. The Apicomplexa display remarkable variation in offspring number, whether karyokinesis follows each S/M-phase or not, and whether daughter cells bud in the cytoplasm or bud from the cortex. We find that the terminology used to describe the various manifestations of asexual apicomplexan cell division emphasizes either the number of offspring or site of budding, which are not directly comparable features and has led to confusion in the literature. Division modes have been primarily studied in two human pathogenic Apicomplexa, malaria-causing Plasmodium spp. and Toxoplasma gondii, a major cause of opportunistic infections. Plasmodium spp. divide asexually by schizogony, producing multiple daughters per division round through a cortical budding process, though at several life-cycle nuclear amplifications stages, are not followed by karyokinesis. T. gondii divides by endodyogeny producing two internally budding daughters per division round. Here we add to this diversity in replication mechanisms by considering the cattle parasite Babesia bigemina and the pig parasite Cystoisospora suis. B. bigemina produces two daughters per division round by a âbinary fissionâ mechanism whereas C. suis produces daughters through both endodyogeny and multiple internal budding known as endopolygeny. In addition, we provide new data from the causative agent of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM), Sarcocystis neurona, which also undergoes endopolygeny but differs from C. suis by maintaining a single multiploid nucleus. Overall, we operationally define two principally different division modes: internal budding found in cyst-forming Coccidia (comprising endodyogeny and two forms of endopolygeny) and external budding found in the other parasites studied (comprising the two forms of schizogony, binary fission and multiple fission). Progressive insights into the principles defining the molecular and cellular requirements for internal vs. external budding, as well as variations encountered in sexual stages are discussed. The evolutionary pressures and mechanisms underlying apicomplexan cell division diversification carries relevance across Eukaryota
Necessary conditions for variational regularization schemes
We study variational regularization methods in a general framework, more
precisely those methods that use a discrepancy and a regularization functional.
While several sets of sufficient conditions are known to obtain a
regularization method, we start with an investigation of the converse question:
How could necessary conditions for a variational method to provide a
regularization method look like? To this end, we formalize the notion of a
variational scheme and start with comparison of three different instances of
variational methods. Then we focus on the data space model and investigate the
role and interplay of the topological structure, the convergence notion and the
discrepancy functional. Especially, we deduce necessary conditions for the
discrepancy functional to fulfill usual continuity assumptions. The results are
applied to discrepancy functionals given by Bregman distances and especially to
the Kullback-Leibler divergence.Comment: To appear in Inverse Problem
Pacific island regional preparedness for El Niño
The El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycle is often blamed for disasters in Pacific island communities. From a disaster risk reduction (DRR) perspective, the challenges with the El Niño part of the ENSO cycle, in particular, are more related to inadequate vulnerability reduction within development than to ENSO-induced hazard influences. This paper analyses this situation, filling in a conceptual and geographic gap in El Niño-related research, by reviewing El Niño-related preparedness (the conceptual gap) for Pacific islands (the geographic gap). Through exploring El Niño impacts on Pacific island communities alongside their vulnerabilities, resiliences, and preparedness with respect to El Niño, El Niño is seen as a constructed discourse rather than as a damaging phenomenon, leading to suggestions for El Niño preparedness as DRR as part of development. Yet the attention which El Niño garners might bring resources to the Pacific region and its development needs, albeit in the short term while El Niño lasts. Conversely, the attention given to El Niño could shift blame from underlying causes of vulnerability to a hazard-centric viewpoint. Instead of focusing on one hazard-influencing phenomenon, opportunities should be created for the Pacific region to tackle wider DRR and development concerns
Review of: Lyons, Sherrie L.: From Cells to Organisms: Re-envisioning Cell Theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press 2020
Molecularizing microscopic imaging : a history of immunofluorescence microscopy as a visual epistemic tool of modern cell biology (1959-1980)
Heutige Zellbiologinnen und Zellbiologen schreiben der Immunfluoreszenzmikroskopie (IFM) einen besonderen historischen Wert zu: das grundlegende Wissen ĂŒber Form und molekulare Zusammensetzung des Cytoskeletts sei ĂŒberwiegend der Anwendung dieses bildgebenden Verfahrens geschuldet. Trotzdem stellt die Geschichte der IFM in der Zellbiologie eine wissenschaftshistorische LĂŒcke dar, die mit der vorliegenden Dissertation bearbeitet wird. Unter BerĂŒcksichtigung der maĂgeblichen biologiehistorischen Kontexte untersuche ich die IFM in ihrer Bedeutung fĂŒr die zellbiologische visuelle Kultur und frage nach den Prozessen, die zu ihrer Adoption und Stabilisierung als visuelle DomĂ€ne gefĂŒhrt haben. Dabei wird auch danach gefragt, wie die IFM von Zellbiolog_innen kritisch verhandelt wurde, inwiefern ihre Adoption die zellbiologische Erkenntnispraxis beeinflusste, und welche SchnittflĂ€chen mit anderen Disziplinen zum Tragen kamen. Ausgehend von einer kritischen Bearbeitung relevanter wissenschaftshistorischer Literatur wird zunĂ€chst die Molekularisierung der Zellbiologie als zentraler Kontext herausgearbeitet. Dabei gewann ab den spĂ€ten 1950er-Jahren eine Forderung zunehmend an Bedeutung: zellulĂ€re Strukturen seien in ihrer molekularen IdentitĂ€t sichtbar zu machen. An dieser Forderung war die Elektronenmikroskopie als dominante visuelle DomĂ€ne gescheitert. Erst die Aneignung der IFM als visuelles Erkenntnisinstrument sollte Zellbiolog_innen eine allgemein anwendbare molekularisierte Bildgebung erlauben. Mittels einer Mikrogeschichte zur ersten Publikation, in der die molekulare Architektur des Cytoskeletts 1974 erstmals ĂŒberzeugend visualisiert worden war, untersuche ich die zellbiologische Aneignung der IFM am Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Diese Institution war von der Molekularbiologie und ihrer Finanzierung durch öffentliche Mittel aus Richard Nixons 1971 ausgerufenen âWar on Cancerâ geprĂ€gt. Die zentralen Akteur_innen dieser Aneignung verfĂŒgten zwar ĂŒber eine fundierte molekularbiologische Expertise, verstanden sich selbst aber (noch) nicht als Angehörige der Zellbiologie; damit waren sie frei von visuellen wie epistemischen ZwĂ€ngen dieser Disziplin und offen fĂŒr unkonventionelle ForschungszugĂ€nge. Parallel zur Stabilisierung der IFM als visuelle DomĂ€ne begannen sie, die âbiochemische Anatomieâ des Cytoskeletts mittels IFM zu entschlĂŒsseln. Die dazu eingesetzte epistemische Praxis bezeichne ich als âmolekularisierte Morphologie der Zelleâ: die Visualisierung und Beschreibung der molekularen Architektur subzellulĂ€rer Strukturen. Diese Praxis wird abschlieĂend untersucht, um zu verstehen, wie es fĂŒr Forscher_innen möglich wurde, einen breit rezipierten Wissensbestand hervorzubringen, der vor allem molekular-morphologische Beschreibungen, aber keine mechanistischen ErklĂ€rungen zellulĂ€rer Funktionen bereitstellte â und damit dem epistemischen Ideal der Zellbiologie zuwiderlief.Todayâs cell biologists ascribe a significant historical value to immunofluorescence microscopy (IFM): almost all fundamental knowledge on form and molecular composition of the cytoskeleton is owed to the application of this imaging technique. Despite its relevance, the history of IFM in cell biology represents a historiographical lacuna that is addressed in this thesis. Drawing from Klaus Hentschelâs concept of visual cultures of science and technology, I ask how IFM was adopted and stabilized as a visual domain of cell biology. I investigate the context of this adoption in the history of biology, how the visual culture and the epistemic practices of cell biology were influenced by it, and how IFM was received by representatives of already established visual domains. Moreover, I address intersections with other disciplines in these dynamics. The first part of this thesis scrutinizes the relevant historiographic literature to carve out the central context: the molecularization of cell biology. Between the late 1950s and the mid-1960s this process brought about demands for visualizing the molecular identity of cellular structures. Electron microscopy as the dominant visual domain of cell biology failed to fulfill these demands. Only the adoption of IFM as a visual epistemic tool made it possible for cell biologists to implement a generally applicable mode of molecularized imaging. The second part of the thesis represents a microhistory of the first scientific paper that convincingly fulfilled these demands in 1974 by using IFM to visualize the molecular composition of the cytoskeleton. I unfold the context of its effective adoption by investigating a development from first attempts to utilize IFM in cell biology in the late 1950s until its successful application in the mid-1970s at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. This institution was epistemically and socially shaped by molecular biology and by its public funding from the âWar on Cancerâ, announced in 1971 by Richard Nixon. The major scientific actors who adopted IFM for cell biology had a substantial expertise in molecular biology but did not understand themselves (yet) as members of the cell biological scientific community. They retrospectively described themselves as exempt from epistemic and visual constraints of this discipline and consequently as free to apply unconventional research strategies. In parallel to the stabilization of IFM as a visual domain of cell biology, the protagonists of its initial adoption started to map the âbiochemical anatomyâ of the cytoskeleton by using this imaging technique. I conceptualize their epistemic practice as âmolecularized morphology of the cellâ: visualizing and describing the molecular architecture of subcellular structures. This practice is analyzed in the last part of this thesis to understand how researchers succeeded in publishing an essential body of knowledge that was nevertheless at odds with the epistemic ideal of cell biology. Practitioners of âmolecularized morphologyâ provided detailed molecular-morphological descriptions but not mechanistic explanations of cellular functions, with the latter becoming a designator for research worth publishing in major cell biology journals during the 1970s