Fluorescent probes of membrane surface properties

AbstractWe have studied the properties of two new fluorescent probes, 7-dimethylaminocoumarin derivatives, 4-[N,N-dimethyl-N-(n-tetradecyl)ammoniummethyl]-7-(N,N-dimethylamino)coumarin chloride (TAMAC) and 4-(n-dodecylthiomethyl)-7-(N,N-dimethylamino)coumarin (DTMAC) in model membrane systems. Both probes are sensitive to solvent polarity. The TAMAC probe has a quaternary ammonium function to position it at a fixed location with respect to the membrane interface. In membranes of dipalmitoleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DiPoPE), both probes detect marked increases in surface hydrophobicity as the bilayer to hexagonal phase transition temperature is approached. This does not occur when the probes are embedded in dipalmitoleoylphosphatidylcholine (DiPoPC) in which case the fluorescence emission is found to be largely independent of temperature. A nitroxide quencher covalently linked to the 5 position of the sn-2 acyl chain of phosphatidy1choline quenches the fluorescence of DTMAC in DiPoPC more than in DiPoPE, indicating the deeper insertion of this probe in DiPoPC. As the temperature is increased the DTMAC fluorophore moves even further out of the membrane. These findings indicate that DTMAC, which does not contain a group to fix its location along the bilayer normal, adjusts its position to small changes in environment polarity, so as to maintain an environment of a fixed dielectric constant. However, with greater changes in membrane interfacial polarity the environment of the probe will be altered. Thus, in addition to the sensitivity of these probes to solvent polarity, the ability of a fixed nitroxide to quench DTMAC becomes another parameter with which to characterize membrane properties with these probes

Interactions of histatin 5 and histatin 5-derived peptides with liposome membranes: surface effects, translocation and permeabilization.

A number of cationic antimicrobial peptides, among which are histatin 5 and the derived peptides dhvar4 and dhvar5, enter their target cells and interact with internal organelles. There still are questions about the mechanisms by which antimicrobial peptides translocate across the membrane. We used a liposome model to study membrane binding, translocation and membrane-perturbing capacities of histatin 5, dhvar4 and dhvar5. Despite the differences in amphipathic characters of these peptides, they bound equally well to liposomes, whereas their membrane activities differed remarkably: dhvar4 translocated at the fastest rate, followed by dhvar5, whereas the histatin 5 translocation rate was much lower. The same pattern was seen for the extent of calcein release: highest with dhvar4, less with dhvar5 and almost none with histatin 5. The translocation and disruptive actions of dhvar5 did not seem to be coupled, because translocation occurred on a much longer timescale than calcein release, which ended within a few minutes. We conclude that peptide translocation can occur through peptide-phospholipid interactions, and that this is a possible mechanism by which antimicrobial peptides enter cells. However, the translocation rate was much lower in this model membrane system than that seen in yeast cells. Thus it is likely that, at least for some peptides, additional features promoting the translocation across biological membranes are involved as well