Review of \u3ci\u3eGentle Eminence: A Life of Cardinal Flahiff\u3c/i\u3e By P. Wallace Platt

This is a very odd book. It is also very interesting- remarkably so. What I cannot determine is whether it is interesting merely because it is odd. Certainly its main subject, George Bernard Flahiff, once Cardinal and Archbishop of Winnipeg, does not appear to have been a very interesting man. What is interesting, however, is the relationship of the biographer to his subject, a man whom P. Wallace Platt obviously admires. Flahiff was Platt\u27s Basilian confrere and spiritual director. It should be no surprise, then, that Platt has much to say about the essential goodness of the man. Indeed, he has written part encomium, part hagiography, and part historical biography. Slightly puzzling, nonetheless, are Platt\u27s repeated allusions to Flahiff\u27s good looks and attractiveness to women. The puzzle, moreover, is wrapped in the enigma of the Church. Here, in particular, Platt falls short of the mark as historical biographer. As an outstanding participant in the Second Vatican Council and as a Cardinal during the elections of both John Paul I and John Paul II, Flahiff doubtlessly mattered. But Platt does not take the opportunity to seek or to offer insight into these momentous events. Instead, we are told that during the conclaves the Cardinals were supplied neither with towels nor soap. (During the second conclave, however, they were permitted alcohol.) Likewise, the accounts of Flahiff\u27s life in the Basilian community of St. Michael\u27s (Toronto), both before and after his time in Winnipeg, offer no insight-at least not for outsiders “into the cast and dynamics of a complex and influential religious community. At the height of his career, when Flahiff was not in Rome, he was in Manitoba. Although he chose eventually to return to Toronto, Platt intones that [i]n his new life Flahiff developed an attitude of belonging and even of ownership to the place [Manitoba] and its people. And yet Flahiff\u27s nearly twenty years as the head of the secular clergy here appear as little more than an interlude in Platt\u27s Basilian and Ontarian story, a defect for which former Manitoba premier Duff Roblin\u27s foreword hardly compensates. Indeed, the small-town Ontarian context of Flahiff\u27s youth receives considerably more attention than the place where he exercised his greatest public influence as a religious leader. Yet even here Platt\u27s particular perspective only raises troubling questions. For example, how is one to reconcile its bourgeois Edwardianism (which Platt portrays with evident relish) with the claim that the atmosphere in Paris, Ontario, of tolerance and mutual respect determined the future Cardinal\u27s ecumenism? Indeed, one could note that it was such tolerance (among other things, admittedly), which had stimulated mass migration from south-western Ontario to the prairies. Ultimately this book is interesting, it seems to me, because of what it tells us about the contradictions of the now infamous insider versus outsider debate. At least it caused me to consider how the debate affects different disciplines differently. Oddly, this book strikes me as both significantly incomprehensible and uncomprehending precisely because it presents an insider\u27s view of religion and an outsider\u27s view of the history of a place or region. Thus, I have no idea why McGill Queen\u27s University Press chose to publish it in their series Studies in the History of Religion ; but I am grateful that they did