Implementing nudges for suicide prevention in real-world environments: project INSPIRE study protocol

Background: Suicide is a global health issue. There are a number of evidence-based practices for suicide screening, assessment, and intervention that are not routinely deployed in usual care settings. The goal of this study is to develop and test implementation strategies to facilitate evidence-based suicide screening, assessment, and intervention in two settings where individuals at risk for suicide are especially likely to present: primary care and specialty mental health care. We will leverage methods from behavioral economics, which involves understanding the many factors that influence human decision making, to inform strategy development. Methods: We will identify key mechanisms that limit implementation of evidence-based suicide screening, assessment, and intervention practices in primary care and specialty mental health through contextual inquiry involving behavioral health and primary care clinicians. Second, we will use contextual inquiry results to systematically design a menu of behavioral economics-informed implementation strategies that cut across settings, in collaboration with an advisory board composed of key stakeholders (i.e., behavioral economists, clinicians, implementation scientists, and suicide prevention experts). Finally, we will conduct rapid-cycle trials to test and refine the menu of implementation strategies. Primary outcomes include clinician-reported feasibility and acceptability of the implementation strategies. Discussion: Findings will elucidate ways to address common and unique barriers to evidence-based suicide screening, assessment, and intervention practices in primary care and specialty mental health care. Results will yield refined, pragmatically tested strategies that can inform larger confirmatory trials to combat the growing public health crisis of suicide

Assessing the Existence of Trauma-Related Diagnostic Overshadowing in Adult Populations

Previous research with youth has shown that clinicians tend to diagnose and treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in trauma-exposed clients, even when clinical presentations indicate that PTSD is not the primary diagnosis. The current study sought to examine this trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing bias in adult cases across different types of trauma exposure. Mental health professionals (N = 232) reviewed two vignettes describing an adult seeking treatment for either obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms or substance use disorder (SUD) symptoms (target disorders). Each participant was randomly assigned to one vignette in which one client endorsed exposure to trauma (i.e., sexual trauma or physical trauma) and one vignette in which the client reported no trauma exposure. Following each vignette, participants responded to questions related to the diagnosis and treatment of the client. In both cases, participants were significantly less likely to choose the target diagnosis and treatment and more likely to choose a PTSD diagnosis and trauma treatment when trauma exposure was present in the vignettes. Evidence for the bias was strongest for vignettes that contained sexual trauma compared to vignettes that contained physical trauma. Evidence for the bias was also more consistent in the OCD case compared to the SUD case. Results indicate evidence for the existence of trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing in adult populations, though the strength of this bias may be dependent on aspects of the trauma and overall clinical presentation. More work is needed to understand factors that may impact the presence of this bias

Youth Trauma Histories are Associated with Under-diagnosis and Under-treatment of Co-occurring Youth Psychiatric Symptoms

Objective: We examined whether in the presence of trauma exposure, non-traumatic stress-related symptoms are interpreted by mental health clinicians as less salient than the trauma exposure and are de-emphasized as a treatment target, consistent with a diagnostic overshadowing bias. Methods: Using an adapted version of a diagnostic overshadowing bias experimental paradigm, mental health clinicians (N = 266, M age = 34.4 years, 82% female) were randomly assigned to receive two of six clinical vignette variations. Vignette 1 described an adolescent with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Vignette 2 described a pre-adolescent with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). Vignettes were identical except for whether the youth reported exposure to a potentially traumatic event (PTE; no PTE, sexual PTE, or physical PTE). Clinicians received one vignette with a PTE and one without, counterbalancing order. Clinicians rated the likelihood the youth met criteria for various diagnoses and the appropriateness of various treatments on 7-point scales. Results: Across both vignettes, clinicians rated the target diagnosis (OCD in Vignette 1, ODD in Vignette 2) as less likely for vignettes with a PTE than for the same vignettes without a PTE. Clinicians also rated evidence-based treatment modalities for target diagnoses as less appropriate in the presence of a PTE than when a PTE was present. Conclusions: Consistent with possible bias, clinicians may under-recognize and under-treat non-traumatic stress-related mental health symptoms in youth with a co-occurring trauma history. Future work to validate this bias in real-world practice is indicated

Freely Available Training Videos for Suicide Prevention: Scoping Review

BackgroundFreely available and asynchronous implementation supports can reduce the resource burden of evidence-based practice training to facilitate uptake. Freely available web-based training videos have proliferated, yet there have been no efforts to quantify their breadth, depth, and content for suicide prevention. ObjectiveThis study presents results from a scoping review of freely available training videos for suicide prevention and describes a methodological framework for reviewing such videos. MethodsA scoping review of freely available training videos (≥2 minutes) for suicide prevention practices was conducted using 4 large video-sharing platforms: YouTube, Vimeo, Bing Video, and Google Video. Identified suicide prevention training videos (N=506) were reviewed and coded. ResultsMost content was targeted toward gatekeepers or other lay providers (n=370) versus clinical providers (n=136). Videos most commonly provided content related to suicidal thoughts or behaviors (n=420). Many videos (n=274, 54.2%) included content designed for certain communities or organizations. Less than half (n=232, 45.8%) of training videos included formal clinical content pertaining to assessment or intervention for suicide prevention. ConclusionsResults suggested an abundance of videos providing broad informational content (eg, “signs and symptoms of someone at risk for suicide”) and a limited portion of videos with instructional content aimed at clinical providers delivering formal evidence-based assessments or interventions for suicide prevention. Development of resources to address identified gaps may be needed. Future work may leverage machine learning techniques to expedite the review process