12 research outputs found

    Prevalence and course of mood and anxiety disorders, and correlates of symptom severity in adolescents with type 1 diabetes:Results from diabetes LEAP

    Get PDF
    Objectives We aim to determine the prevalence and the course of anxiety and mood disorders in Dutch adolescents (12-18 years old) with type 1 diabetes, and to examine correlates of symptom severity, including parental emotional distress. Methods Participants were 171 adolescents and 149 parents. The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-IV was used to assess current, past year and lifetime anxiety and mood disorders in adolescents. Symptom severity and diabetes distress were measured with validated questionnaires. Correlates of these symptoms were examined using hierarchical regression analyses and included demographics (adolescent sex and age), clinical factors (diabetes duration, treatment modality, most recent glycated hemoglobin A1c ; all extracted from medical charts), adolescent diabetes distress, and parent emotional distress. Results Twenty-four (14%) adolescents met the criteria for ≥1 disorder(s) in the previous 12 months. Anxiety disorders were more prevalent than mood disorders (13% vs. 4%). Lifetime prevalence of anxiety and mood disorders was 29% (n = 49). The presence of any of these disorders earlier in life (from 5 years old up to 12 months prior to assessment) was associated with disorders in the past 12 months (OR = 4.88, p = 0.001). Higher adolescent diabetes distress was related to higher symptoms of anxiety (b = 0.07, p = 0.001) and depression (b = 0.13, p = 0.001), while demographics, clinical characteristics, and parental emotional distress were not related. Conclusions Anxiety and mood disorders are common among adolescents and related to earlier disorders. Higher diabetes distress was related to higher symptom severity. Clinicians are advised to address past psychological problems and remain vigilant of these problems

    [Two newborns with both small-bowel atresia and cystic fibrosis]

    No full text
    Contains fulltext : 58873.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Two newborn girls presented with congenital small-bowel atresia; in one case a high intestinal obstruction had been demonstrated by prenatal echography, while in the other case there were feeding problems and a failure to produce meconium. In both infants, the postoperative period was complicated by feeding problems, malabsorption and insufficient growth. Cystic fibrosis (CF) was then diagnosed in both patients. After modification of the diet, both showed rapid growth to a normal weight. The prevalence of CF in children with congenital small-bowel atresia is 6-13%, which is considerably higher than in a normal population. There is still no good explanation for this finding, but it is likely that CF contributes to the development of small-bowel atresia. In view of the high prevalence of CF in children with small-bowel atresia, children with congenital small-bowel atresia should be examined for CF

    [Two newborns with both small-bowel atresia and cystic fibrosis]

    No full text
    Two newborn girls presented with congenital small-bowel atresia; in one case a high intestinal obstruction had been demonstrated by prenatal echography, while in the other case there were feeding problems and a failure to produce meconium. In both infants, the postoperative period was complicated by feeding problems, malabsorption and insufficient growth. Cystic fibrosis (CF) was then diagnosed in both patients. After modification of the diet, both showed rapid growth to a normal weight. The prevalence of CF in children with congenital small-bowel atresia is 6-13%, which is considerably higher than in a normal population. There is still no good explanation for this finding, but it is likely that CF contributes to the development of small-bowel atresia. In view of the high prevalence of CF in children with small-bowel atresia, children with congenital small-bowel atresia should be examined for CF

    Neonatale hemochromatose als oorzaak van leverfalen.

    No full text
    Contains fulltext : 70962.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access

    A Systematic Review of Instruments Measuring the Division of Care Responsibilities between Children with Type 1 Diabetes and their Parents.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: The division of care responsibilities between parents and children with type 1 diabetes, and an optimal transfer of responsibilities from parent to child over time are assumed to be key for optimal diabetes outcomes during childhood and adolescence. However, an overview of instruments assessing this division as well as their psychometric qualities is currently lacking. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to 1) identify all existing instruments, 2) evaluate their psychometric properties, and 3) provide an overview of scoring methods. METHODS: Pubmed and PsycINFO were searched using a priori-defined search string. Peerreviewed studies in English using an instrument assessing the division of diabetes care responsibilities between children (6-18 years) and parents were included. In total, 84 of 725 articles qualified, covering 62 unique samples. RESULTS: Thirteen questionnaires were identified. The Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (DFRQ) was most frequently used across studies. Instructions, content and number of tasks, response options, and scoring methods varied across questionnaires. Recent studies often adapted questionnaires, contributing to the heterogeneity across measures. Overall, reporting and quality of psychometric properties was suboptimal. CONCLUSION: The division of diabetes care responsibilities can be operationalized with various instruments, each having its strengths and weaknesses but all with limited psychometric support. To measure the division of diabetes care responsibilities more adequately, an updated version of the popular DFRQ or a new scale needs to be developed and evaluated

    The division and transfer of care responsibilities in paediatric type 1 diabetes: A qualitative study on parental perspectives

    Get PDF
    Contains fulltext : 231017.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)Aim: To determine which factors other than child age play a role in the division and transfer of diabetes care responsibilities between parents and children with type 1 diabetes. Design: Qualitative focus group study. Methods: Across four sites in the Netherlands, 18 parents (13 mothers) of children (9–14 years) with type 1 diabetes participated in four focus groups in 2015–2016, as part of the research project 'Whose diabetes is it anyway?'. Qualitative content analysis and the constant comparison method were used to analyse the data. Results: According to parents, the transfer process included both direct and indirect tasks, had different levels (remembering, deciding, performing), was at times a difficult and stressful process, and showed large variation between families. A large number of child, parent and context factors were identified that affected the division and transfer of diabetes care responsibilities according to parents. Both positive and negative consequences of the transfer process were described for parental and child health, behaviour and well‐being. Parental final evaluations of the division and transfer of diabetes care responsibilities appeared to be dependent on parenting values. Conclusion: How families divide and transfer diabetes care tasks appeared to be affected by a complex interplay of child, parent and context characteristics, which had an impact on several parent and child domains. Impact Parents struggle with the right timing of transfer, which calls for more support from diabetes nurses. The identified factors can be used as input for integrating a more family‐based approach into current age‐based guidelines, to improve regular care.12 p
    corecore