Implant augmentation: Adding bone cement to improve the treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures:A biomechanical study using human cadaver bones

The increasing problems in the field of osteoporotic fracture fixation results in specialized implants as well as new operation methods, for example, implant augmentation with bone cement. The aim of this study was to determine the biomechanical impact of augmentation in the treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures. Seven pairs of osteoporotic fresh frozen distal femora were randomly assigned to either an augmented or nonaugmented group. In both groups, an Orthopaedic Trauma Association 33 A3 fractures was fixed using the locking compression plate distal femur and cannulated and perforated screws. In the augmented group, additionally, 1 mL of polymethylmethacrylate cement was injected through the screw. Prior to mechanical testing, bone mineral density (BMD) and local bone strength were determined. Mechanical testing was performed by cyclic axial loading (100 N to 750 N + 0.05N/cycle) using a servo-hydraulic testing machine. As a result, the BMD as well as the axial stiffness did not significantly differ between the groups. The number of cycles to failure was significantly higher in the augmented group with the BMD as a significant covariate. In conclusion, cement augmentation can significantly improve implant anchorage in plating of osteoporotic distal femur fractures

Treatment of distal humeral fractures using conventional implants. Biomechanical evaluation of a new implant configuration

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In the face of costly fixation hardware with varying performance for treatment of distal humeral fractures, a novel technique (U-Frame) is proposed using conventional implants in a 180° plate arrangement. In this in-vitro study the biomechanical stability of this method was compared with the established technique which utilizes angular stable locking compression plates (LCP) in a 90° configuration.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>An unstable distal 3-part fracture (AO 13-C2.3) was created in eight pairs of human cadaveric humeri. All bone pairs were operated with either the "Frame" technique, where two parallel plates are distally interconnected, or with the LCP technique. The specimens were cyclically loaded in simulated flexion and extension of the arm until failure of the construct occurred. Motion of all fragments was tracked by means of optical motion capturing. Construct stiffness and cycles to failure were identified for all specimens.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Compared to the LCP constructs, the "Frame" technique revealed significant higher construct stiffness in extension of the arm (P = 0.01). The stiffness in flexion was not significantly different (P = 0.16). Number of cycles to failure was found significantly larger for the "Frame" technique (P = 0.01).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In an in-vitro context the proposed method offers enhanced biomechanical stability and at the same time significantly reduces implant costs.</p

Bone cement allocation analysis in artificial cancellous bone structures.

Background One of the most serious adverse events potentially occurring during vertebroplasty is cement leakage. Associated risks for the patient could be reduced if cement filling is preoperatively planned. This requires a better understanding of cement flow behaviour. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate bone cement distribution in artificial inhomogeneous cancellous bone structures during a simulated stepwise injection procedure. Methods Four differently coloured 1-mL cement portions were injected stepwise into six open-porous aluminum foam models with simulated leakage paths. Each model was subsequently cross-sectioned and high-resolution pictures were taken, followed by anatomical site allocation based on the assumption about a posterior insertion of the cannula. A radial grid consisting of 36 equidistant beams (0°-350°) was applied to evaluate the cement flow along each beam by measuring the radial length of each cement portion (total length) and of all four portions together (distance to border). Independently from the injection measurements, the viscosity of 20 cement portions was measured at time points corresponding to the start of the first and the end of the last injection. Results Despite some diffuse colour transitions at the borderlines, no interfusion between the differently coloured cement portions was observed. The two highest values for total length of each of the first three injected cement portions and for distance to border were indicated in directions anterior bilateral to the cannula along the 120°, 240° and 250° beams and posterolateral along the 60° beam. The two highest total lengths for the fourth cement portion were registered in the direction of the cannula along the 170° and 180° beams. Standard deviations of total length for each of the last three injected portions and for distance to border were with two highest values in directions anterior bilateral to the cannula along the 120°, 150°, 240° and 250° beams and opposite to the direction of the cannula along the 10° beam. The two highest values for the first cement portion were registered posterior bilateral to the cannula along the 70° and 350° beams. The values for averaged standard deviations of the total length of the fourth cement portion and the distance to border were significantly higher in comparison to the first cement portion (p ≤ 0.020). Dynamic viscosity at the start of the first injection was 343 ± 108 Pa∙s and increased to 659 ± 208 Pa∙s at the end of the fourth injection. Conclusion The simulated leakage path seemed to be the most important adverse injection factor influencing the uniformity of cement distribution. Another adverse factor causing dispersion of this distribution was represented by the simulated bone marrow. However, the rather uniform distribution of the totally injected cement amount, considered as one unit, could be ascribed to the medium viscosity of the used cement. Finally, with its short waiting time of 45 s, the stepwise injection procedure was shown to be ineffective in preventing cement leakage

Comparison of migration behavior between single and dual lag screw implants for intertrochanteric fracture fixation

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Lag screw cut-out failure following fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in osteoporotic bone remains an unsolved challenge. This study tested if resistance to cut-out failure can be improved by using a dual lag screw implant in place of a single lag screw implant. Migration behavior and cut-out resistance of a single and a dual lag screw implant were comparatively evaluated in surrogate specimens using an established laboratory model of hip screw cut-out failure.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Five dual lag screw implants (Endovis, Citieffe) and five single lag screw implants (DHS, Synthes) were tested in the Hip Implant Performance Simulator (HIPS) of the Legacy Biomechanics Laboratory. This model simulated osteoporotic bone, an unstable fracture, and biaxial rocking motion representative of hip loading during normal gait. All constructs were loaded up to 20,000 cycles of 1.45 kN peak magnitude under biaxial rocking motion. The migration kinematics was continuously monitored with 6-degrees of freedom motion tracking system and the number of cycles to implant cut-out was recorded.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The dual lag screw implant exhibited significantly less migration and sustained more loading cycles in comparison to the DHS single lag screw. All DHS constructs failed before 20,000 cycles, on average at 6,638 ± 2,837 cycles either by cut-out or permanent screw bending. At failure, DHS constructs exhibited 10.8 ± 2.3° varus collapse and 15.5 ± 9.5° rotation around the lag screw axis. Four out of five dual screws constructs sustained 20,000 loading cycles. One dual screw specimens sustained cut-out by medial migration of the distal screw after 10,054 cycles. At test end, varus collapse and neck rotation in dual screws implants advanced to 3.7 ± 1.7° and 1.6 ± 1.0°, respectively.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The single and double lag screw implants demonstrated a significantly different migration resistance in surrogate specimens under gait loading simulation with the HIPS model. In this model, the double screw construct provided significantly greater resistance against varus collapse and neck rotation in comparison to a standard DHS lag screw implant.</p