42 research outputs found

    Development and Pilot of a Checklist for Management of Acute Liver Failure in the Intensive Care Unit

    Get PDF
    Introduction Acute liver failure (ALF) is an ideal condition for use of a checklist. Our aims were to develop a checklist for the management of ALF in the intensive care unit (ICU) and assess the usability of the checklist among multiple providers. Methods The initial checklist was developed from published guidelines and expert opinion. The checklist underwent pilot testing at 11 academic liver transplant centers in the US and Canada. An anonymous, written survey was used to assess the usability and quality of the checklist. Written comments were used to improve the checklist following the pilot testing period. Results We received 81 surveys involving the management of 116 patients during the pilot testing period. The overall quality of the checklist was judged to be above average to excellent by 94% of users. On a 5-point Likert scale, the majority of survey respondents agreed or agreed strongly with the following checklist characteristics: the checklist was easy to read (99% agreed/agreed strongly), easy to use (97%), items are categorized logically (98%), time to complete the checklist did not interfere with delivery of appropriate and safe patient care (94%) and was not excessively burdensome (92%), the checklist allowed the user the freedom to use his or her clinical judgment (80%), it is a useful tool in the management of acute liver failure (98%). Web-based and mobile apps were developed for use of the checklist at the point of care. Conclusion The checklist for the management of ALF in the ICU was shown in this pilot study to be easy to use, helpful and accepted by a wide variety of practitioners at multiple sites in the US and Canada

    Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of l‐ornithine phenylacetate in patients with acute liver injury/failure and hyperammonemia

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142428/1/hep29621.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142428/2/hep29621-sup-0001-suppinfo1.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142428/3/hep29621_am.pd

    This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST '14). Open access to the Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST '14) is sponsored by Toward Strong, Us

    No full text
    Abstract As non-expert users produce increasing amounts of personal digital data, usable access control becomes critical. Current approaches often fail, because they insufficiently protect data or confuse users about policy specification. This paper presents Penumbra, a distributed file system with access control designed to match users' mental models while providing principled security. Penumbra's design combines semantic, tag-based policy specification with logic-based access control, flexibly supporting intuitive policies while providing high assurance of correctness. It supports private tags, tag disagreement between users, decentralized policy enforcement, and unforgeable audit records. Penumbra's logic can express a variety of policies that map well to real users' needs. To evaluate Penumbra's design, we develop a set of detailed, realistic case studies drawn from prior research into users' access-control preferences. Using microbenchmarks and traces generated from the case studies, we demonstrate that Penumbra can enforce users' policies with overhead less than 5% for most system calls
    corecore