A Method to Combine Neurofilament Light Measurements From Blood Serum and Plasma in Clinical and Population-Based Studies

Introduction Neurofilament light (NfL) can be detected in blood of healthy individuals and at elevated levels in those with different neurological diseases. We investigated if the choice of biological matrix can affect results when using NfL as biomarker in epidemiological studies. Method We obtained paired serum and EDTA-plasma samples of 299 individuals aged 37–67 years (BiDirect study) and serum samples of 373 individuals aged 65–83 years (MEMO study). In BiDirect, Passing–Bablok analyses were performed to assess proportional and systematic differences between biological matrices. Associations between serum or EDTA-plasma NfL and renal function (serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, glomerular filtration rate, and kidney disease) were investigated using linear or logistic regression, respectively. All regression coefficients were estimated (1) per one ng/L increase and (2) per one standard deviation increase (standardization using z-scores). In MEMO, regression coefficients were estimated (1) per one ng/L increase of serum or calculated EDTA-plasma NfL and (2) per one standard deviation increase providing a comparison to the results from BiDirect. Results We found proportional and systematic differences between paired NfL measurements in BiDirect, i.e., serum NfL [ng/L] = −0.33 [ng/L] + 1.11 × EDTA-plasma NfL [ng/L]. Linear regression coefficients for the associations between NfL and renal function did not vary between the different NfL measurements. In MEMO, one standard deviation increase in serum NfL was associated with greater changes in the outcomes than in BiDirect. Conclusion Although there are differences between serum and EDTA-plasma NfL, results can be used interchangeably if standardized values are used

CSF Neurofilament Light Chain Concentrations Predict Outcome in Bacterial Meningitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a biomarker for neuroaxonal damage and has been found to be elevated proportionally to the degree of neuronal damage in neurologic diseases. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic accuracy of NfL concentrations on unfavorable outcome in adults with community-acquired bacterial meningitis. METHODS: We measured NfL concentration CSF samples from a prospective cohort study of adults with community-acquired bacterial meningitis in The Netherlands and determined associations between NfL CSF concentrations, clinical characteristics, and outcome in multivariate analyses. We identified independent predictors of an unfavorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale scores 1-4) by logistic regression. RESULTS: CSF NfL concentrations were evaluated in 429 episodes of 425 patients with community-acquired bacterial meningitis. The median age of 429 episodes was 62 years (interquartile range, 50-69 years). Of note, 290 of 422 (68%) episodes presented with an altered mental status (Glasgow Coma Scale score < 14). Most common causative pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (73%), Neisseria meningitidis (7%), and Listeria monocytogenes (5%). The overall case fatality rate was 62 of 429 (15%), and unfavorable outcome occurred in 57 (37%) of 429 episodes. In multivariate analysis, predictors of unfavorable outcome were older age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05), cranial nerve palsy (OR 4, 95% CI 1.6-10.3), high serum C-reactive protein concentration (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.01-1.05), and high CSF NfL concentration (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.07-2.00). CSF NfL concentrations were higher in patients presenting with focal cerebral deficits (717 pg/mL [416-1,401] vs 412 pg/mL [278-731]; p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting unfavorable outcome in bacterial meningitis of CSF NfL concentration was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64-0.74). DISCUSSION: CSF NfL concentration is independently associated with unfavorable outcome in adults with community-acquired bacterial meningitis, suggesting that CSF NfL concentration may be a useful biomarker for prognostic assessment in bacterial meningitis. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: Can the level of NfL in CSF (the index test) predict unfavorable outcome in patients with bacterial meningitis, in a cohort of bacterial meningitis patients with a favorable and unfavorable outcome? This study provides Class II evidence that NfL level in CSF is a moderate predictor, with the AUC for predicting unfavorable outcome in bacterial meningitis being 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64-0.74)

A cystatin C cleavage ELISA assay as a quality control tool for determining sub-optimal storage conditions of cerebrospinal fluid samples in alzheimer's disease research

Background: An N-terminal octapeptide cleavage of the cystatin C protein was discovered by mass spectrometry when cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was stored at -20°C for 3 months, which did not occur when CSF was stored at -80°C. Objective: The aim was to develop an immunoassay as quality assessment tool to detect this -20°C cleavage of cystatin C in CSF and support Alzheimer's disease research. Methods: A specific monoclonal antibody and a double indirect sandwich ELISA were developed: one assay quantifies the octapeptide uncleaved protein specifically and the other quantifies the total cystatin C present in the biological fluid (both cleaved and uncleaved forms). The ratio of these concentrations was calculated to assess the extent of cleavage of cystatin C. The novel ELISA was validated and applied in a short-term (up to 4 weeks) and mid-term (up to one year) stability study of CSF stored at 4°C, -20°C, -80°C, and liquid nitrogen. Impact of freeze-thaw cycles, adsorption, and protease inhibitors were tested. Results: The ratio of truncated protein was modified following -20°C storage and seemed to reach a plateau after 6 months. The ratio was impacted neither by freeze-thaw cycles nor adsorption. The -20°C specific cleavage was found to be protease related. Conclusion: Using this novel double indirect sandwich ELISA, absolute levels of the total and uncleaved cystatin C and the ratio of truncated cystatin C can be measured. This assay is an easily applicable tool which can be used to confirm that CSF biospecimen are fit-for-purpose for Alzheimer's disease research

Assessing the Pre-Analytical Stability of Small-Molecule Metabolites in Cerebrospinal Fluid Using Direct-Infusion Metabolomics

Metabolomics studies aiming to find biomarkers frequently make use of historical or multicenter cohorts. These samples often have different pre-analytical conditions that potentially affect metabolite concentrations. We studied the effect of different storage conditions on the stability of small-molecule metabolites in cerebrospinal fluid to aid a reliable interpretation of metabolomics data. Three cerebrospinal fluid pools were prepared from surplus samples from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort biobank. Aliquoted pools were exposed to different storage conditions to assess the temperature and freeze/thaw stability before final storage at -80 °C: storage up to four months at -20 °C and up to one week at either 5-8 °C or 18-22 °C and exposure to up to seven freeze/thaw cycles. Direct-infusion high-resolution mass spectrometry was performed, resulting in the identification of 1852 m/z peaks. To test the storage stability, principal component analyses, repeated measures analysis of variance, Kruskal‒Wallis tests, and fold change analyses were performed, all demonstrating that small-molecule metabolites in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are relatively unaffected by 1‒3 freeze/thaw cycles, by storage at -20 °C up to two months, by storage at 5-8 °C for up to 72 h, or by storage at 18-22 °C for up to 8 h. This suggests that these differences do not affect the interpretation of potential small-molecule biomarkers in multicenter or historical cohorts and implies that these cohorts are suitable for biomarker studies

Additional file 1 of Bioinformatics tools and data resources for assay development of fluid protein biomarkers

Additional file 1: Use cases for dementia protein biomarkers. PDF document of extended use cases for three biomarker candidates of Alzheimer's Disease: neurogranin, tau and TREM2. For each biomarker a suitability survey was performed and then compared to the current knowledge of these proteins. The document contains figures and results of the used bioinformatics tools and data resources as well as our interpretation of these results

Preanalytical Stability of CSF Total and Oligomeric Alpha-Synuclein

Background: The role of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) alpha-synuclein as a potential biomarker has been challenged mainly due to variable preanalytical measures between laboratories. To evaluate the impact of the preanalytical factors contributing to such variability, the different subforms of alpha-synuclein need to be studied individually. Method: We investigated the effect of exposing CSF samples to several preanalytical sources of variability: (1) different polypropylene (PP) storage tubes; (2) use of non-ionic detergents; (3) multiple tube transfers; (4) multiple freeze-thaw cycles; and (5) delayed storage. CSF oligomeric- and total-alpha-synuclein levels were estimated using our in-house sandwich-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results: Siliconized tubes provided the optimal preservation of CSF alpha-synuclein proteins among other tested polypropylene tubes. The use of tween-20 detergent significantly improved the recovery of oligomeric-alpha-synuclein, while multiple freeze-thaw cycles significantly lowered oligomeric-alpha-synuclein in CSF. Interestingly, oligomeric-alpha-synuclein levels remained relatively stable over multiple tube transfers and upon delayed storage. Conclusion: Our study showed for the first-time distinct impact of preanalytical factors on the different forms of CSF alpha-synuclein. These findings highlight the need for special considerations for the different forms of alpha-synuclein during CSF samples' collection and processing

Comparing csf amyloid-beta biomarker ratios for two automated immunoassays, elecsys and lumipulse, with amyloid pet status

Introduction: We evaluated for two novel automated biomarker assays how cere-brospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid beta (Aβ)1– 42-ratios improved the concordance with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) positivity compared to Aβ1– 42 alone. Methods: We selected 288 individuals from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort across the Alzheimer’s disease clinical spectrum when they had both CSF and amyloid PET visual read available, regardless of diagnosis. CSF Aβ1– 42, phosphorylated tau (p-tau), and total tau (t-tau) were measured with Elecsys and Lumipulse assays, and Aβ1–40 with Lumipulse. CSF cut-points were defined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for amyloid PET positivity. Results: For both Elecsys and Lumipulse the p-tau/Aβ1– 42,Aβ1– 42/Aβ1– 40,andt-tau/Aβ1– 42 ratios showed similarly good concordance with amyloid PET (Elecsys: 93,90,90%; Lumipulse: 94,92,90%) and were higher than Aβ1– 42 alone (Elecsys 85%; Lumipulse 84%). Discussion: Biomarker ratios p-tau/Aβ1– 42,Aβ1– 42/Aβ1– 40,t-tau/Aβ1– 42 on two automated platforms show similar optimal concordance with amyloid PET in a memory clinic cohort

Urine as matrix for analysis of neurofilament light chain is not suitable to distinguish frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric diseases

The clinical overlap of frontotemporal dementia and primary psychiatric diseases hampers diagnostic distinction, leading to frequent misdiagnosis and diagnostic delay. Neurofilament light chain has shown great potential in CSF and blood for the distinction of frontotemporal dementia from primary psychiatric diseases. Measurement of neurofilament light chain in urine would be even more patient-friendly. We aimed to test the performance of neurofilament light chain urine measurements for diagnostics in frontotemporal dementia and to assess their correlation with serum levels. Fifty-five subjects (n = 19 frontotemporal dementia, n = 19 primary psychiatric diseases and n = 17 controls) were included with available paired urine and serum samples. All subjects underwent standardized extensive diagnostic assessment. Samples were analysed with the ultrasensitive single molecule array neurofilament light chain assay. Neurofilament light chain group comparisons were performed adjusted for age, sex and geriatric depression scale. In the majority of the cohort, neurofilament light chain concentrations were not detectable in urine (n = 6 samples above lower limit of detection (0.038 pg/ml): n = 5 frontotemporal dementia, n = 1 primary psychiatric disease). The frequency of a detectable neurofilament light chain level in urine in the frontotemporal dementia group did not differ from psychiatric disorders (Fisher Exact-test P = 0.180). In the individuals with detectable urine neurofilament light chain values, there was no correlation between the urine and serum neurofilament light chain levels. As expected, serum neurofilament light chain levels were higher in frontotemporal dementia compared to primary psychiatric diseases and controls (P < 0.001), adjusted for age, sex and geriatric depression scale. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of serum neurofilament light chain of frontotemporal dementia versus primary psychiatric diseases showed an area under the curve of 0.978 95% confidence interval 0.941–1.000, P < 0.001. Urine is not suitable as a matrix for neurofilament light chain analysis and serum neurofilament light chain is still the most patient-friendly matrix for differentiation between frontotemporal dementia and primary psychiatric diseases

A Combination of Neurofilament Light, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, and Neuronal Pentraxin-2 Discriminates Between Frontotemporal Dementia and Other Dementias

BACKGROUND: The differential diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is still a challenging task due to its symptomatic overlap with other neurological diseases and the lack of biofluid-based biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic potential of a combination of novel biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood. METHODS: We included 135 patients from the Center for Memory Disturbances, University of Perugia, with the diagnoses FTD (n = 37), mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (MCI-AD, n = 47), Lewy body dementia (PDD/DLB, n = 22), and cognitively unimpaired patients as controls (OND, n = 29). Biomarker levels of neuronal pentraxin-2 (NPTX2), neuronal pentraxin receptor, neurofilament light (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were measured in CSF, as well as NfL and GFAP in serum. We assessed biomarker differences by analysis of covariance and generalized linear models (GLM). We performed receiver operating characteristics analyses and Spearman correlation to determine biomarker associations. RESULTS: CSF NPTX2 and serum GFAP levels varied most between diagnostic groups. The combination of CSF NPTX2, serum NfL and serum GFAP differentiated FTD from the other groups with good accuracy (FTD versus MCI-AD: area under the curve (AUC) [95% CI] = 0.89 [0.81-0.96]; FTD versus PDD/DLB: AUC = 0.82 [0.71-0.93]; FTD versus OND: AUC = 0.80 [0.70-0.91]). CSF NPTX2 and serum GFAP correlated positively only in PDD/DLB (ρ= 0.56, p < 0.05). NPTX2 and serum NfL did not correlate in any of the diagnostic groups. Serum GFAP and serum NfL correlated positively in all groups (ρ= 0.47-0.74, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We show the combined potential of CSF NPTX2, serum NfL, and serum GFAP to differentiate FTD from other neurodegenerative disorders