sj-docx-2-pps-10.1177_17456916231180580 – Supplemental material for When and Why Do People Accept Public-Policy Interventions? An Integrative Public-Policy-Acceptance Framework

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-pps-10.1177_17456916231180580 for When and Why Do People Accept Public-Policy Interventions? An Integrative Public-Policy-Acceptance Framework by Sonja Grelle and Wilhelm Hofmann in Perspectives on Psychological Science</p

sj-pdf-1-pps-10.1177_17456916231180580 – Supplemental material for When and Why Do People Accept Public-Policy Interventions? An Integrative Public-Policy-Acceptance Framework

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-pps-10.1177_17456916231180580 for When and Why Do People Accept Public-Policy Interventions? An Integrative Public-Policy-Acceptance Framework by Sonja Grelle and Wilhelm Hofmann in Perspectives on Psychological Science</p

Key characteristics of the five implicit measures.

<p><i>Note.</i> fop  =  favorite other person, pos  =  positive, neg  =  negative; ***<i>p</i>  = .001, *<i>p</i>  = .05.</p

Effect sizes and standard errors of explicit and implicit preferences.

<p>All effects significant at <i>p</i><.05.</p

SUPPLEMENTARY_MATERIALS_incl_references – Supplemental material for Moral Punishment in Everyday Life

<p>Supplemental material, SUPPLEMENTARY_MATERIALS_incl_references for Moral Punishment in Everyday Life by Wilhelm Hofmann, Mark J. Brandt, Daniel C. Wisneski, Bettina Rockenbach and Linda J. Skitka in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</p

sj-pdf-1-pss-10.1177_09567976221122765 – Supplemental material for Neural and Cognitive Signatures of Guilt Predict Hypocritical Blame

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-pss-10.1177_09567976221122765 for Neural and Cognitive Signatures of Guilt Predict Hypocritical Blame by Hongbo Yu, Luis Sebastian Contreras-Huerta, Annayah M. B. Prosser, Matthew A. J. Apps, Wilhelm Hofmann, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Molly J. Crockett in Psychological Science</p

Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions’ effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior—several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people’s initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors

Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions' effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior-several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people's initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors.</p

Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions' effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior-several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people's initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors.</p