Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background: Observational cohort studies have suggested that minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is associated with better short-term outcomes compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP), such as less intraoperative blood loss, lower morbidity, shorter length of hospital stay, and reduced total costs. Confounding by indication has probably influenced these findings, given that case-matched studies failed to confirm the superiority of MIDP. This accentuates the need for multicenter randomized controlled trials, which are currently lacking. We hypothesize that time to functional recovery is shorter after MIDP compared with ODP even in an enhanced recovery setting. Methods: LEOPARD is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, patient-blinded, multicenter, superiority trial in all 17 centers of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. A total of 102 patients with symptomatic benign, premalignant or malignant disease will be randomly allocated to undergo MIDP or ODP in an enhanced recovery setting. The primary outcome is time (days) to functional recovery, defined as all of the following: independently mobile at the preoperative level, sufficient pain control with oral medication alone, ability to maintain sufficient (i.e. >50%) daily required caloric intake, no intravenous fluid administration and no signs of infection. Secondary outcomes are operative and postoperative outcomes, including clinically relevant complications, mortality, quality of life and costs. Discussion: The LEOPARD trial is designed to investigate whether MIDP reduces the time to functional recovery compared with ODP in an enhanced recovery setting. Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register, NTR5188. Registered on 9 April 201

Ergonomics in handheld and robot-assisted camera control: a randomized controlled trial

Background: Laparoscopic surgery potentially increases the physical burden to operating theater personnel and can cause physical discomfort. This study aims to evaluate if a robotic camera holder (AutoLap™ system) can improve ergonomics for the surgeon and the camera assistant during laparoscopic procedures. Methods: A total of thirty cases were included and randomized (15 AutoLap™, 15 control). Five types of surgery were included: right hemicolectomy, fundoplication, sigmoid resection, rectopexy, and low anterior resection. The posture of the surgeon and assistant was photographed during predefined steps of the procedure. MATLAB was used to calculate angles relevant for the RULA score. The RULA score is a validated method to evaluate body posture, force and repetition of the upper extremities. Two investigators assessed the RULA score independently. Three subjective questionnaires (SMEQ, NASA TLX, and LED) were used to assess mental and physical discomfort. Results: No differences in patient characteristics were observed. Sixteen fundoplications, seven right hemicolectomies, five sigmoid resections, one rectopexy, and one low anterior resection were included. The mean RULA score of the surgeon was comparable in both groups, 2.58 (AutoLap™) versus 2.72 (control). The mean RULA score of the assistant was significantly different in both groups, with 2.55 (AutoLap™) versus 3.70 (control) (p = 0.001). The inter-observer variability (ICC) was excellent with 0.93 (surgeon) and 0.97 (assistant). The questionnaires showed a significant difference in physical discomfort for the assistant. The LED and SMEQ score were significantly lower in the robotic group. The NASA TLX demonstrated a significant reduction in scores in all domains when using robotics with the exception of the mental domain. Conclusion: Use of the AutoLap™ system shows improvement in ergonomics and posture of the first assistant, and ergonomics of the surgeon are not affected. Furthermore, the subjective work load is significantly reduced by using a robotic camera holder. Trial registration number: NCT0339960, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT03339960?term=autolap&rank=5

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T is associated with cognitive decline in older adults at high cardiovascular risk

Aims Cardiac troponin T (cTnT), measured with a high-sensitivity (hs) assay, is associated with cognitive decline, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. We investigated the association of hs-cTnT with cognitive function and decline, and studied whether this association was independent of cardiovascular diseases or risk factors, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Methods and results We studied 5407 participants (mean age 75.31 years) from the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER), who all had cardiovascular diseases or risk factors thereof. Participants with pre-existent advanced clinical heart failure were excluded. Hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP obtained after 6 months of follow-up were related with cognitive function, tested repeatedly during a mean follow-up of 3.2 years. Participants with higher hs-cTnT performed worse at baseline on Stroop test (mean baseline score (standard error (SE)) lowest vs highest third 65.91 (1.16) vs 69.40 (1.10) seconds, p < 0.001), Letter-Digit Coding test (23.35 (0.32) vs 22.40 (0.31) digits coded, p < 0.001), immediate Picture-Word Learning test (9.45 (0.09) vs 9.31 (0.08) pictures remembered, p = 0.002) and delayed Picture-Word Learning test (10.33 (0.12) vs 10.10 (0.12) pictures remembered, p = 0.013). Furthermore, participants with higher hs-cTnT had steeper decline on Stroop test (mean annual change (SE) lowest vs highest third 0.34 (0.12) vs 1.06 (0.12) seconds, p = 0.013), Letter-Digit Coding test (-0.29 (0.03) vs -0.46 (0.03) digits coded, p < 0.001), immediate Picture-Word Learning test (0.01 (0.01) vs -0.06 (0.01) pictures remembered, p < 0.001) and delayed Picture-Word Learning test (-0.03 (0.01) vs -0.12 (0.02) pictures remembered, p = 0.001). Associations were independent of cardiovascular diseases risk factors or Apolipoprotein E genotype. Further adjusting for NT-proBNP levels revealed the same results. Conclusions Higher levels of hs-cTnT associate with worse cognitive function and steeper cognitive decline in older adults independent of cardiovascular diseases, risk factors and NT-proBNP