7 research outputs found

    Galectin-9 and CXCL10 as biomarkers for disease activity in juvenile dermatomyositis: a longitudinal cohort study and multi-cohort validation

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: Objective evaluation of disease activity is challenging in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) due to lack of biomarkers, but crucial to avoid both under- and overtreatment. Recently, we identified two proteins that highly correlate with JDM disease activity: galectin-9 and CXCL10. Here, we validate galectin-9 and CXCL10 as biomarkers for disease activity, assess disease-specificity and investigate their potency to predict flares. METHODS: Galectin-9 and CXCL10 were measured in serum samples of 125 unique JDM patients in three international cross-sectional cohorts and a local longitudinal cohort, by multiplex immunoassay. Disease-specificity was examined in 50 adults with (dermato)myositis and 61 patients with other systemic autoimmune diseases. RESULTS: Galectin-9 and CXCL10 outperformed the currently used marker creatine kinase (CK) to distinguish between JDM patients with active disease and remission, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally (area ROC curve: 0.86-0.90 for galectin-9 and CXCL10, 0.66-0.68 for CK). The sensitivity and specificity were 0.84 and 0.92 for galectin-9, and 0.87 and 1.00 for CXCL10. In 10 prospectively followed patients with a flare, continuously elevated or rising biomarker levels suggested an imminent flare up to several months before symptoms, even in absence of elevated CK. Galectin-9 and CXCL10 distinguished between active disease and remission in adults with (dermato)myositis and were suited for measurement in minimally-invasive dried blood spots. CONCLUSIONS: Galectin-9 and CXCL10 were validated as sensitive and reliable biomarkers for disease activity in (J)DM. Implementation of these biomarkers into clinical practice, as tools to monitor disease activity and guide treatment, might facilitate personalized treatment strategies

    Parents’ perspectives on nusinersen treatment for children with spinal muscular atrophy

    No full text
    Aim: To gain insight into parents’ perspectives about their decision-making process concerning nusinersen treatment for their child, including perceived needs and concerns, and to explore factors that influence this process. Method: This was an exploratory qualitative interview study among parents of children with spinal muscular atrophy types 1 to 3. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Nineteen parents of 16 children representing 13 families participated. A wide variety of perspectives was reported ranging from a biomedical approach, which focused on battling the disease, to a holistic approach, which aimed for a good quality of life for their child. The most important factors that helped parents to decide were honest and neutral communication with their physician and access to available information. Interpretation: It is important physicians understand that there are different perspectives influencing the decision-making process. Physicians should create an environment that allows parents to accept or reject treatment by communicating honestly and openly with them and by discussing both options extensively. Clear information about pros and cons, recent developments in research, and the experiences of other parents should be made available to enable parents to make an informed decision. What this paper adds Parents perceived different needs and concerns about nusinersen treatment, which emphasized individual differences. Parents’ perspectives varied from battling the disease to preserving quality of life. Life expectancy, stopping deterioration, and improving quality of life were the perceived benefits of nusinersen treatment. Open communication about the pros and cons of treatment with clinicians facilitated decision-making. Clear and honest information facilitated the alignment of values and goals
    corecore