16 research outputs found

    The Role of Releasing Incisions in Emergency Inguinal Hernia Repair

    Get PDF
    The majority of inguinal hernia repairs worldwide are performed on an outpatient basis. However, incarceration and concern for strangulation of abdominal contents necessitates emergent repair in order to address visceral ischemia. In the setting of salvageable ischemia, this necessitates release of strangulation of blood supply by the hernia defect and reduction of visceral contents into the abdominal cavity. In certain cases, this cannot be achieved with simple manual reduction, and requires enlargement of the aperture of the hernia defect with releasing incisions in order to allow reduction. We aim to describe strategies for releasing incisions via open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches in emergency inguinal hernia repair

    Comparison of Diabetic Remission Rates following Roux en-Y Gastric Bypass and Longitudinal Sleeve Gastrectomy

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Bariatric surgery is being increasingly investigated as treatment for Type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). As Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) surpasses Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) as the new standard in bariatric surgery, it is still unknown if its efficacy in achieving remission is comparable to RYGB. This study compared diabetic remission rates between SG and RYGB in order to identify the predictive factors for remission and the mechanisms of achieving remission. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing all diabetic patients undergoing RYGB and SG at an academic medical center from 1/1/11-7/1/15. Patients were followed preoperatively and at 6 week, 6 month, and 1, 2, and 3 year intervals. We defined diabetic remission as HbA1c under 7 without insulin or hypoglycemic use and excess body weight (EBW) as percent over ideal body weight. Data were analyzed using Cox analysis, Fisher’s Exact Tests, and Student T Tests. Results: During the study, 96 patients underwent RYGB and 89 underwent SG. Preoperatively, patients from both groups had similar age, weight, gender, preoperative weight loss, HbA1c at onset and at surgery, oral hypoglycemic use, insulin use, and HOMA2 parameters. At one year postoperatively, patients who underwent RYGB showed a statistically greater postoperative EBW loss (62% vs. 36% p \u3c 0.0001). Kaplan Meier analysis showed a significantly higher rate of remission, (83% vs. 66%) in patients who underwent SG (p=0.02). After using Cox analysis to account for differences in delta BMI (p=0.04), EBW loss (p=0.04), preoperative HOMA2 parameters (p=0.008-0.011), and preoperative factors such as HbA1c and insulin use (p=0.001 for both), there was no change in RYGB’s impact on diabetic remission compared to SG. Conclusion: Our results confirm that RYGB achieves a significantly greater rate of diabetic remission and a significantly higher weight loss than SG. Additionally, the difference in rate of diabetic remission is not explained by weight loss or preoperative predictors of less reversible diabetes (HOMA2 parameters, use of insulin). Identification of the factor(s) responsible for this differential effect on diabetes may afford opportunity for therapeutic intervention

    Differences in Complication Rates Between Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Longitudinal Sleeve Gastrectomy

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) has surpassed Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) as the most commonly performed bariatric operation. Though the beneficial effect of SG on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is less than that of RYGB, it is perceived to have a lower complication rate. The purpose of this study was to quantify the complication rates between of SG and RYGB in a severely obese diabetic population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that included all diabetic patients undergoing RYGB and SG at an academic medical center from January 1, 2011 to July 1, 2015. Patients were followed at 6 week, 6 month, 1 year, 2 year, and 3 year postoperatively. Outpatient and emergency visits were identified in the EMR system. Continuous data was analyzed using Student T tests and discrete data was analyzed using Fisher’s Exact Test. We defined early complications as those occurring within 30 days postoperatively, and late complications as those after 30 days. Results: A total of 96 patients underwent RYGB and 89 underwent SG. The groups were concurrent and similar with regards to preoperative demographic factors such as age, gender, Hgb-A1c, HOMA2 parameters, excess body weight, BMI, and diabetic medication use. In terms of early complications, the rate of hemorrhage requiring transfusion was higher in the SG group compared to RYGB (10.1% vs. 3.1%, p=0.073). Postoperative length of stay was lower in the SG group (m=1.7 d vs. m=2 d, p=0.02), but the early readmission rate was also higher in the SG group (7.9% vs. 2.1%, p=0.09). For late postoperative complications, there were 4 anastomotic ulcer perforations and one case of internal hernia in the RYGB group. There were 6 late postoperative reoperations in the RYGB group (6% vs. 0%, p=0.03). In addition, 13 patients underwent 16 total upper endoscopies in the RYGB group (13.5% vs. 0%, p=0.0002). The cumulative rate of early and late interventions was higher in the RYGB group (20% vs. 3.4%, p=0.0005). Conclusions: While the rate of early postoperative complication is similar between SG and RYGB, the need for late intervention is higher after RYGB. The cumulative need for reintervention (early and late) is higher after RYGB. This may explain the shift from Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass to Sleeve Gastrectomy as the most commonly performed bariatric intervention

    Short-term perioperative outcomes among patients with concurrent asymptomatic and mild SARS-CoV-2 infection: A retrospective, multicenter study

    No full text
    BackgroundPrevious studies report high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality among patients with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). With routine preoperative screening, we are identifying an increasing number of patients with asymptomatic and mild COVID-19. Based on these prior studies, we hypothesized that patients with asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 infections have low perioperative morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with operations performed on patients diagnosed with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19.MethodsA multicenter, retrospective study of patients with asymptomatic/mild SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection diagnosed within 8 days of surgery from March 2020 to February 2021. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and secondary outcomes included pulmonary complications and perioperative morbidity. The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention criteria of COVID severity was used for categorization.ResultsThe initial cohort included 53 patients. COVID-19 infection was detected preoperatively in 86.8%. At admission, 90.5% of patients were asymptomatic, 7.5% had mild COVID-19 symptoms, and 1.9% were unknown due to obtundation and later determined to be asymptomatic. Of the 53 cases, 35.8% were general surgical and 18.9% orthopedic; the remaining 54.7% were other surgical subspecialties. Overall mortality was 0%. New COVID-19 symptoms developed in 13.2% of patients postoperatively, with only 11.3% developing postoperative pulmonary complications.ConclusionPostoperative morbidity and mortality rates were low among patients with asymptomatic and mild COVID-19. The risks of nonoperative management should be weighed against these operative risks in such patients with surgical indications

    The effect of mycophenolate mofetil on disease development in the gld.apoE (-/-) mouse model of accelerated atherosclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus.

    Get PDF
    Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease that is characterized by autoantibody production and inflammatory disease involving multiple organs. Premature atherosclerosis is a common complication of SLE and results in substantial morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD). The reasons for the premature atherosclerosis in SLE are incompletely understood, although chronic inflammation is thought to play an important role. There is currently no known preventative treatment of premature atherosclerosis in SLE. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive agent that is commonly used for treatment of patients with SLE. In order to study the impact of this drug on murine lupus disease including premature atherosclerosis development, we treated gld.apoE(-/-) mice, a model of SLE and accelerated atherosclerosis, with MMF. We maintained seven-week old gld.apoE(-/-) mice on a high cholesterol Western diet with or without MMF. After 12 weeks on diet, mice receiving MMF showed decreased atherosclerotic lesion area compared to the control group. MMF treatment also improved the lupus phenotype, indicated by a significant decrease circulating autoantibody levels and ameliorating lupus nephritis associated with this model. This data suggests that the effects of MMF on the immune system may not only be beneficial for lupus, but also for inflammation driving lupus-associated atherosclerosis

    Decreased atherosclerosis in <i>gld.apoE−/−</i> mice treated with MMF.

    No full text
    <p>Aortic root atherosclerotic lesion area in MMF-treated or control mice. <i>A,</i> Representative photographs of aortic root stained with Oil Red O from mice maintained on Western diet for 12 wk and treated with 200 mg/kg/day MMF or untreated. <i>B,</i> Atherosclerotic lesion area of Oil Red O-stained aortae was quantified in both groups (*, <i>p = </i>0.02). <i>C</i>, Total serum cholesterol was quantified in control mice and mice treated with 200 mg/kg/day MMF.</p

    Renal disease is ameliorated in <i>gld.apoE−/−</i> mice after MMF treatment.

    No full text
    <p>The mice were treated with MMF or control for 12 wk. <i>A,</i> Representative H&E-stained sections of kidney in both groups. Glomerular tuft size (<i>B</i>) (*, <i>p = </i>0.002) and cell count (<i>C</i>) (**, <i>p = </i>0.004) were measured by computer-assisted pixel counting. Values shown are the mean ± SEM.</p

    Total food intake and average body weights.

    No full text
    <p><i>A</i>, Food was weighed weekly and total amount ingested was recorded for each group (control, n = 8; MMF, n = 9). <i>B,</i> Evolution of body weight as weighed weekly during the course of the experiment.</p
    corecore